Plenty of accusations of my being being a troll, plenty of chatter of the aforementioned superlatives, which hate to tell you, mean nothing. A few mentions of James' young age, which sounds more like an excuse as opposed to a rebuttal of my critique. And I was aware of his age btw but it wouldn't come as a surprise because he played like an 18/19 yr old in the B1G last year. He played like a lineman who lived off of being bigger/stronger than everybody in HS and is now matched against people who are up to the challenge. Someone asked about my credentials and what qualifies me to judge this player but let's be honest, if I told you would that make you agree with me? Probably not. Besides, the worlds biggest fool can say that the sun isn't shining but that doesn't make it dark out. My personal favorite was someone posting a single play from a highlight segment where Jame's looked good and used that to conclude that I'm wrong. To that I'll say, there's a reason scouts watch game film and not highlight reels, ya know? I never said the guy never had any good plays. Lastly, I fully acknowledge that coming in to IC and playing OL as a true freshmen is an unbelievable achievement. Very very few are able to even get an attempt at pulling it off. However that in and of itself could just as easily be seen as an indictment of the depth at the position than it could be a credit to James. In in of itself, that means very little.
That said, great, the Hawkeye OL won an award for best in the country last year. Congratulations. It's a great honor and it pleases me that Iowa received this recognition. But let's be real here, there is no flippin way they were the best OL in the country. Hell, even B. Ferentz himself said that the OL "struggled" at pass pro last year. Which you know, is a point I raised in the OP. The best OL in the country doesn't struggle at pass protection. The best OL in the country doesn't struggle at anything.
I noticed in another thread talking about where the Hawks ranked in rushing and after learning that Iowa was 49th-67th in the nation (depending on how you calculate it) everyone seemed to be in disbelief. But you're not in disbelief, you're in denial. And when you really start peeling back the layers it gets even worse...Iowa offense ranked 72 in total yards, 89th in passing, 54th in scoring, 67th in sacks allowed- 30 SACKS last year, for a team that rarely throws it. And 81 TFL!! Oh and btw, part of the reason the rushing ranking is sub par is BECAUSE of the TFL. Somebody please explain to me how the best OL in the country gives up 6 TFL per game.
Somehow the vaunted Iowa OL managed to achieve these abysmal results all the while having what appears to be an NFL capable QB,TE, 2 RB's and maybe a WR too. I've always said, when you have great skill players and you're mysteriously horrible on offense it's almost always due to poor OL play. Something is amiss here, and it doesn't take a troll to point it out.