He doesn't, but it's what the market will bear.Seriously what am I missing here? Why does Jason Heyward deserve a $300 million contract over 10 years? What has he ever done to deserve that? That is Mike Trout kind of money. I understand he's 26, but it just seems like to much of a price tag for an injury prone CF/RF/LF.
Seriously what am I missing here? Why does Jason Heyward deserve a $300 million contract over 10 years? What has he ever done to deserve that? That is Mike Trout kind of money. I understand he's 26, but it just seems like to much of a price tag for an injury prone CF/RF/LF.
As a Cubs fa I hope we don't land him. I've seen him play enough to know he's not an elite player.
It's called the free marketSeriously what am I missing here? Why does Jason Heyward deserve a $300 million contract over 10 years? What has he ever done to deserve that? That is Mike Trout kind of money. I understand he's 26, but it just seems like to much of a price tag for an injury prone CF/RF/LF.
Cardinals Rotation next year is
Wainwright
Martinez
Wacha
J Garcia
Gonzalas/Berhle
I totally expect Berhle to sign with the Cardinals
It's called the free market
Seriously what am I missing here? Why does Jason Heyward deserve a $300 million contract over 10 years? What has he ever done to deserve that? That is Mike Trout kind of money. I understand he's 26, but it just seems like to much of a price tag for an injury prone CF/RF/LF.
Where was it reported about $300 mill? All I had been seeing for the past several weeks is they were predicting it may be a 10 year $200 mill contract.
Where are you seeing or hearing $300 million?I am hearing $200 million over 10 years.Seriously what am I missing here? Why does Jason Heyward deserve a $300 million contract over 10 years? What has he ever done to deserve that? That is Mike Trout kind of money. I understand he's 26, but it just seems like to much of a price tag for an injury prone CF/RF/LF.
You need to find a different show to listen to that is awful.I heard last night on the APC (Brommelkamp's show) that they were saying $250, $275, or $300 million over 10 years. Maybe they were wrong, but Brommelkamp is pretty knowledgeable about baseball so I usually don't question what he says.
You need to find a different show to listen to that is awful.
One of the top 5 defensive players in baseball.As a Cubs fa I hope we don't land him. I've seen him play enough to know he's not an elite player.
One of the top 5 defensive players in baseball.
7th highest WAR in baseball the last 2 years, .1 ahead of Anthony Rizzo. I'm down with $25 mil per year, I'd just be happier with 6-8 years instead of 10. But, I'd be happy with 10 if he helps get the Cubs a WS ring. Even a single ring would be worth it.
That is the only way I like it if the Cubs sign Heyward. At his age he'll probably want to opt out for another shot at a huge contract in 4-5 years. I'm like SSGT, I am willing to spend a lot of the Rickett's family money, but when you get 7+ years on a deal that's just too much. But, for a ring?Sounds like he wants an opt out after 4 or 5 years. That could end up being a good deal for all parties.
7th highest WAR in baseball the last 2 years, .1 ahead of Anthony Rizzo. I'm down with $25 mil per year, I'd just be happier with 6-8 years instead of 10. But, I'd be happy with 10 if he helps get the Cubs a WS ring. Even a single ring would be worth it.
The WAR. Is nice...But $25 million for a guy who hit .290 with 13HR and 60RBI? He's a career .268 hitter who hasn't hit more than 14HR in any of his last 3 years. No thanks.
That is the only way I like it if the Cubs sign Heyward. At his age he'll probably want to opt out for another shot at a huge contract in 4-5 years. I'm like SSGT, I am willing to spend a lot of the Rickett's family money, but when you get 7+ years on a deal that's just too much. But, for a ring?
Maybe they were wrong, but Brommelkamp is pretty knowledgeable about baseball so I usually don't question what he says.
If it's five years then the Cubs have the money coming off the books needed to pay Bryant, or Russell, or Schwarber.Yep, I'd be happier with a 5/150 than a 10/200. More per year, but on the hook for fewer years and less overall money.
Gah, if it's Spann, just go with Baez. He may strike out 200 times (I'd doubt it would be that much) but he'd give you some freaking incredible plays and HRS too.If it's five years then the Cubs have the money coming off the books needed to pay Bryant, or Russell, or Schwarber.
I heard on the Score today that Denard Spahn is the back up plan. I'd rather they just skipped plan B and go with a one year guy, or a patch work solution until the trade deadline and see what's out there. Spahn is crappy and injured.