ADVERTISEMENT

Jason Whitlock Nails It!

22*43*51

HB Legend
Nov 23, 2008
16,430
4,299
113
Crying Wolfe Exposes Real Problem

tumblr_inline_nxnvmxdAhg1teghlh_540.jpg



Chicago buried nine-year-old Tyshawn Lee on Tuesday. Police allege gang members lured the boy into an alley and executed him in a revenge killing aimed at his father.

Father Michael Pfleger, a white minister in a predominantly black Chicago community, eulogized Lee and castigated our society, blaming the boy’s death on our “lost conscience.”

How can we argue?

The execution of an innocent black boy draws the attention of a handful of local dignitaries while the death of a black teenager foolish enough to wrestle a cop for control of a gun helps foment unrest on a nearby college campus seven months after then-attorney general Eric Holder destroyed the fallacy of “Hands Up Don’t Shoot.”

Lies stacked on top of lies create the bullshit we’re witnessing in Columbia, Missouri. Clever faculty members, in my opinion, baited a small group of misguided black students into stirring a racial shitstorm strong enough to attract Twitter-addicted journalists looking for their next relevancy hit off the Black Lives Matter crack pipe.

The absurdity of the past week at Mizzou couldn’t be duplicated on South Park.

A 25-year-old, “Fresh Prince” black grad student threatened to starve himself to death under the pretense that the school president hadn’t done enough to stop unidentified white men from uttering the N-word when passing by in trucks and carving swastikas with poop.



The white liberal, Ta-Nehisi Coates-quoting mafia declared Mizzou an unsafe space and a hostile killing field for blacks and opened their media platforms to any person willing to share a story about hearing the N-word while in Columbia the past 50 years.

“Cry Wolfe!” is how this entire episode should be remembered. Liberal academics talked black kids into crying wolf over racially tinged rude behavior so an unpopular president would be unseated.

Adult professors who should be educating kids on the continuing damage of institutional racism, instead built a human shield around a tent city set up to host the starvation of an N-word fighter disguised as a freedom fighter.

A redneck showing his ass with verbal garbage while driving a truck isn’t racism. It’s a redneck showing his ass. Racism is a system of exploitation rooted in race. The NCAA amateurism charade is a solid example. Walter Byers, the white conservative modern architect of the NCAA, described the system he created this way in his 1997 memoir:

“Today the NCAA Presidents Commission is preoccupied with tightening a few loose bolts in a worn machine, firmly committed to the neo-plantation belief that the enormous proceeds from the college games belong to the overseers (administrators) and supervisors (coaches). The plantation workers performing in the arena may only receive those benefits authorized by the overseers.”

You’d think if the Missouri football players were going to strike, they’d choose NCAA amateurism as their cause, not the homecoming king’s hurt feelings. And you’d think if the son of a millionaire was going to threaten to end his life over an injustice, he’d choose an inspiration more heart-wrenching than a poop-stained Nazi symbol.

Why not choose Tyshawn Lee?

Ask one of those liberal academics to explain the connection between mass incarceration and gang violence. They go together like peanut butter and jelly. The ruthless, gang-related execution of a black child is a direct outgrowth of mass incarceration and its corrosive impact on morality, decency and humanity.

Concerned Student 1950 needs to ask Mizzou’s liberal academics to carry them to Tyshawn Lee’s neighborhood and create a safe space there. Seriously. Assimilated, spoiled black kids showing up on modern college campuses and pretending they’re standing on the Edmund Pettus Bridge in 1965 is f—ing embarrassing. What’s worse is assimilated, spoiled black journalists selling the righteousness of their cause.

Columbia ain’t our problem. Chicago is.

tumblr_inline_nxnvglXCJL1teghlh_540.jpg

This quad is not the place in most need of a safe space.

That’s not a statement vouching for the purity of Columbia. It’s rational, mature acknowledgment that there are not, never have been and never will be any safe spaces on earth free of rude, uncomfortable behavior by humans. We’re flawed. We do dumb shit.

The appropriate questions for the kids, the journalists and their white, liberal enablers/manipulators are: 1) Which area is more in need of a safe space, Mizzou’s campus or Lee’s neighborhood? 2) Why are liberals pouring the most energy and passion into policing the safest space? 3) Why have those same liberals declared war on the very people and profession (police) they call at the first sign of trouble in the most unsafe space?

It’s all enough to make you think they don’t really have the best interest of black folk in mind. Let me remind you again: In general, African-Americans are the most religious people in America. We are traditionally conservative, which does not mean Republican. The black church, where Father Pfleger serves, has always looked first to create safe spaces where black people live.

I’m not evangelizing. I’m trying to show you who’s on your Day 1 team and who’s driving a limousine offering rides to tokens willing to be used as pawns.

I’m also trying to avoid ridiculing millennials. Whatever their shortcomings are, they’re a reflection of previous generations’ failures. We turned the education of our best and brightest kids over to predominantly white schools. We allowed them to abandon the black church. It’s not difficult to understand why they can’t distinguish between rude behavior and racism.

Liberal elites define racism as “code words” and “dog whistles” and the utterance of the N-word by white people. They reduced racism to a language. Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks, Thurgood Marshall and our Greatest Generation defined racism as laws and policy.

Teach that in your home, at your church and at school and there won’t be another smokescreen, racial circus the next time faculty decide to overthrow a high-ranking administrator. I’d suggest the media teach it, too, but I can’t reduce the message to a 140-character tweet.

http://j.school/post/133025099640/crying-wolfe-exposes-real-problem
 
  • Like
Reactions: diehardhawk82
"Seriously. Assimilated, spoiled black kids showing up on modern college campuses and pretending they’re standing on the Edmund Pettus Bridge in 1965 is f—ing embarrassing."

Boom...
 
That's an excellent article.

The one flaw is attaching the conservative/liberal label to various people or groups. By resorting to generic labels he commits the same "crime" that others do when they use a word like ******. People see the label and tune out what he says. It does not add to the point he is making and leads the very people he is trying to influence to discount his opinion.
 
8 uses of the word liberal.

Not to say I don't like some of the lines in there.

Liberal elites define racism as “code words” and “dog whistles” and the utterance of the N-word by white people. They reduced racism to a language. Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks, Thurgood Marshall and our Greatest Generation defined racism as laws and policy.

Maybe SJW in place of liberals? Although that is a bit of a charged term, but applies less to me so eff it. I would think there is cultural racism and systemic racism?

PS I don't know anything about the poop story in Missouri, but I wonder how much bigger of a deal this would be if the swastika was made in links instead of smeared. Step it up edgy college kids.

soluble-fiber.png
 
That's an excellent article.

The one flaw is attaching the conservative/liberal label to various people or groups. By resorting to generic labels he commits the same "crime" that others do when they use a word like ******. People see the label and tune out what he says. It does not add to the point he is making and leads the very people he is trying to influence to discount his opinion.

You beat me to it, and said it better.
 
That's an excellent article.

The one flaw is attaching the conservative/liberal label to various people or groups. By resorting to generic labels he commits the same "crime" that others do when they use a word like ******. People see the label and tune out what he says. It does not add to the point he is making and leads the very people he is trying to influence to discount his opinion.

He does tend to push all of his topics a touch too far.

"Controversial" is a lucrative writing style, I would imagine.
 
8 uses of the word liberal.

Not to say I don't like some of the lines in there.



Maybe SJW in place of liberals? Although that is a bit of a charged term, but applies less to me so eff it. I would think there is cultural racism and systemic racism?

PS I don't know anything about the poop story in Missouri, but I wonder how much bigger of a deal this would be if the swastika was made in links instead of smeared. Step it up edgy college kids.

soluble-fiber.png

I would totally agree that SJW is a better term. All SJW's are liberal but not all liberals are SJW's.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moral_victory
I don't get the point here. Are we not supposed to be cheering for a systemically oppressed minority leader's ability to (hopefully) fundamentally change an institution with which they are directly involved and affected and which countless others may have been marginalized in the future? As said in many other threads, there is no argument that Columbia is a pretty darn racist place- are we supposed to just allow the state's flagship of education and progressive thought to sit idly by and watch as its own students (by their own accounts) struggle because of an unchangeable part of their identity?

What is happening in Chicago is terrible-I can't begin to comprehend all the dynamics that contribute to such a quagmire, let alone the path out-but I don't see the link to Columbia. Is the point to have the Mizzou activists (so-appointed as they ATTEND Mizzou) uproot and go and fight the incarceration-gang complex in Chicago? Or have the media covering them to ignore Mizzou for Chicago?

Someone just splain what you guys are patting each other on the back for concerning this article, please!
 
When I saw Jason Whitlock nailed it I thought I was going to read a column about how awesome the Iowa Hawkeyes are this season. Great article that most people with a pulse and half a brain already know, and those that don't won't read it or will instantly dismiss it.
 
I don't get the point here. Are we not supposed to be cheering for a systemically oppressed minority leader's ability to (hopefully) fundamentally change an institution with which they are directly involved and affected and which countless others may have been marginalized in the future? As said in many other threads, there is no argument that Columbia is a pretty darn racist place- are we supposed to just allow the state's flagship of education and progressive thought to sit idly by and watch as its own students (by their own accounts) struggle because of an unchangeable part of their identity?

What is happening in Chicago is terrible-I can't begin to comprehend all the dynamics that contribute to such a quagmire, let alone the path out-but I don't see the link to Columbia. Is the point to have the Mizzou activists (so-appointed as they ATTEND Mizzou) uproot and go and fight the incarceration-gang complex in Chicago? Or have the media covering them to ignore Mizzou for Chicago?

Someone just splain what you guys are patting each other on the back for concerning this article, please!

Whitlock thinks your description of the goings on in Columbia are dramatically overstated; As do many.

He cites the tragedy in Chicago as being a cause worthy of taking up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: belezabro
I don't get the point here. Are we not supposed to be cheering for a systemically oppressed minority leader's ability to (hopefully) fundamentally change an institution with which they are directly involved and affected and which countless others may have been marginalized in the future? As said in many other threads, there is no argument that Columbia is a pretty darn racist place- are we supposed to just allow the state's flagship of education and progressive thought to sit idly by and watch as its own students (by their own accounts) struggle because of an unchangeable part of their identity?

What is happening in Chicago is terrible-I can't begin to comprehend all the dynamics that contribute to such a quagmire, let alone the path out-but I don't see the link to Columbia. Is the point to have the Mizzou activists (so-appointed as they ATTEND Mizzou) uproot and go and fight the incarceration-gang complex in Chicago? Or have the media covering them to ignore Mizzou for Chicago?

Someone just splain what you guys are patting each other on the back for concerning this article, please!

Those students chose to attend a college with a long history of racism in a state that isn't exactly forward thinking. They could have chose to go to a great institution 5 hours north with a long history of being inclusive and progressive, but they didn't. Life is all about choices and what those kids dealt with at Mizzu is nothing compared to what kids deal with in Chicago on a daily basis.
 
Those students chose to attend a college with a long history of racism in a state that isn't exactly forward thinking. They could have chose to go to a great institution 5 hours north with a long history of being inclusive and progressive, but they didn't. Life is all about choices and what those kids dealt with at Mizzu is nothing compared to what kids deal with in Chicago on a daily basis.

Ok, so they should've left their home state to attend a different, pricier college so they wouldn't have to deal with racism. And let Mizzou continue on with its "tradition," that was clearly working for so many people.

Got it. How dare they try and make things better where they are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Whitlock thinks your description of the goings on in Columbia are dramatically overstated; As do many.

He cites the tragedy in Chicago as being a cause worthy of taking up.

Again I don't see the connection. Folks in Columbia are changing the environment in which they exist. Many are commending them from afar.
I think those same many would cheer for any folks in Chicago or elsewhere that would beneficially change the environment there as well.

Is it the media coverage you guys have a problem with?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Is it the media coverage you guys have a problem with?

I think Jason Whitlock's "media coverage" is much more accurate than anything else I've seen up to this point.

He points out false narratives like "Hands Up! Don't Shoot!" as fueling spectacles like what happened in Columbia.
 
I don't get the point here. Are we not supposed to be cheering for a systemically oppressed minority leader's ability to (hopefully) fundamentally change an institution with which they are directly involved and affected and which countless others may have been marginalized in the future? As said in many other threads, there is no argument that Columbia is a pretty darn racist place- are we supposed to just allow the state's flagship of education and progressive thought to sit idly by and watch as its own students (by their own accounts) struggle because of an unchangeable part of their identity?

What is happening in Chicago is terrible-I can't begin to comprehend all the dynamics that contribute to such a quagmire, let alone the path out-but I don't see the link to Columbia. Is the point to have the Mizzou activists (so-appointed as they ATTEND Mizzou) uproot and go and fight the incarceration-gang complex in Chicago? Or have the media covering them to ignore Mizzou for Chicago?

Someone just splain what you guys are patting each other on the back for concerning this article, please!

How has this minority leader you speak of been 'systematically oppressed'?

How is he going to fundamentally change it? Did you see the list of his demands?
 
How has this minority leader you speak of been 'systematically oppressed'?

How is he going to fundamentally change it? Did you see the list of his demands?

It's the minority that has been systematically oppressed. If you want an explanation of that, I will require several hours of your time

I saw the demands- most are quite modest and address progress that should have been made years ago. Many schools already offer "concessions" like student input into leadership hiring, integrated counseling services, and comprehensive plans to address shortcomings. And, it's a widespread academic issue of many schools not having enough black faculty, so there's a chance to beat the curve in that regard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Ok, so they should've left their home state to attend a different, pricier college so they wouldn't have to deal with racism. And let Mizzou continue on with its "tradition," that was clearly working for so many people.

Got it. How dare they try and make things better where they are.
The question is though, is it as bad as they say? I mean in all seriousness, I've seen some instances of racial problems on campuses before.

But do you know what I noticed? It was the black kids starting most of the ish.

True story, we are having a party at our apartment in college. This one black dude came over with some other friends. He was fine, and his blackness was not an issue. He was simply one of us and everyone was cool. For whatever reason as the night went and he kept drinking, he started ranting and raving about him being black and racism, and blah, blah, blah.

The problem with this, is that HE was the one who kept making a big deal of it. It got to the point that it was annoying and someone said something to him, to cool him down. He then got all riled up and started causing a scene. Immediately another drunk dude got in his face, and basically told him that he needs to quit causing problems where there aren't any. The black guy pushed him, and the other guy immediately grabbed one of my roommates bongs and BAAM!! Whacked him over the head with a bong(my roommates) and the dude pretty much ran out bleeding and mumbling nonsense. The guy who hit him was blasted drunk too, and barely remembered the incident the next day, as he simply reacted to the push. We tried to follow the guy out that got hit, but he was so nonsensical and basically telling us that "he knew we were racist". What a bunch of BS.

I guarantee you that he thought of that incident as injustice, racism, or as white on black crime. When in fact, he was the one that started the entire thing. Had he just kept partying with us and hanging out, as he was NOT the only non-white there, everything would have been fine. Of course though he had been raised to believe that white people are all the devil, and for some reason, he put himself into a situation where he was able to prove that(IN HIS OWN MIND), by being a dumbass. The reality though is that he victimized himself, alienated himself, and ultimately got what he wanted.

BOTTOMLINE: Black America is being steered by some in their own communities, the race-baiters, and sections of the Liberal establishment to believe they are victims and that they are constantly under threat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Tradition
It's the minority that has been systematically oppressed. If you want an explanation of that, I will require several hours of your time

I saw the demands- most are quite modest and address progress that should have been made years ago. Many schools already offer "concessions" like student input into leadership hiring, integrated counseling services, and comprehensive plans to address shortcomings. And, it's a widespread academic issue of many schools not having enough black faculty, so there's a chance to beat the curve in that regard.
The minority has been systematically put into place to where they can succeed. If you want me to explain that it will require less than several hours. Anything that needs to be explained for several hours in a moral capacity is more and likely not the truth. The truth is very easy to explain.

What's going on here, is that you hear all the complaints about 'racism', and unfairness, yet black people kill themselves more than white people ever could. It's absolutely ridiculous to hear how 'injustice' happens, when they are the number one threat to themselves.

If they want to actually be taken seriously, then they better fix their problems first.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: INXS83
Is it the media coverage you guys have a problem with?[/QUOTE]

Absolutely. I have little concern that someone in Missouri insulted someone else, black or white. It deserves little attention. I am concerned about the issues that the underprivileged in our society face, black and white. That deserves attention.

I think that is the point the author was making.
 
So, to summarize HawktimusPrime's positions:

1) It's black people to blame for racial tension; I knew a black guy who was mean to me once.
2) We have propped minorities up for years- it's their fault they're not succeeding.
3) "Those people" should stop hurting and killing each other if they want to be taken seriously.

Lol I guess this is my fault for attempting to talk race on an Iowa message board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarolinaHawkeye
Absolutely. I have little concern that someone in Missouri insulted someone else, black or white. It deserves little attention. I am concerned about the issues that the underprivileged in our society face, black and white. That deserves attention.

I think that is the point the author was making.

This is a very reasonable perspective and does aid my understanding of what may have been the author's purpose.
However, if you find a way to direct media attention from issues of lesser to greater consequence, I would be excited to hear it.
 
So, to summarize HawktimusPrime's positions:

1) It's black people to blame for racial tension; I knew a black guy who was mean to me once.
2) We have propped minorities up for years- it's their fault they're not succeeding.
3) "Those people" should stop hurting and killing each other if they want to be taken seriously.

Lol I guess this is my fault for attempting to talk race on an Iowa message board.

The author is African American and you are discounting his feelings on race and Columbia pretty easily.
 
So, to summarize HawktimusPrime's positions:

1) It's black people to blame for racial tension; I knew a black guy who was mean to me once.
2) We have propped minorities up for years- it's their fault they're not succeeding.
3) "Those people" should stop hurting and killing each other if they want to be taken seriously.

Lol I guess this is my fault for attempting to talk race on an Iowa message board.
You have no experience with black communities do you? You probably live in a white suburb and you're only experience is with co-workers and fellow students correct? It is always your types that talk like this.

1. It is mostly black people causing it. They are the ones playing the 'knockout game', they are the ones who riot after criminals get shot, they are the ones that are constantly blaming white america for all their problems.

2. We have propped them up for years, affirmative action, social engineering, allowing for instances of blatant racism and simply laughing them off. BET anyone? ALL black schools? It IS their fault they aren't succeeding, how can you possibly argue against that? Are you that thick in the head? Who's fault is it then? The KKK's?

3. Also, your third point is delicious to me, because it is exactly what I've been talking about. YOU COMPLETELY ignore that VERY real fact. I mean are you stating that as if I'm wrong about that?

How about you try to actually counter my points? How about you try to actually not used your ridiculous naive and biased approach first and then we can have a real conversation. All you did, was repeat what I said in an attempt to undermine what I've said. You would get somewhere if you actually spoke against what you clearly do not agree with and explain.
 
The author is African American and you are discounting his feelings on race and Columbia pretty easily.
He also showed his true motivations, as life and death to him are less important than the words that may be 'hurtful' to someone.

He's mad that there have been instances of 'unfairness', or 'racism', yet he has nothing to offer to the violence that takes lives.

He's a true product of the system, as he can't recognize anything that the system hasn't forced into his head.
 
This is a very reasonable perspective and does aid my understanding of what may have been the author's purpose.
However, if you find a way to direct media attention from issues of lesser to greater consequence, I would be excited to hear it.
It's not the perspective that you are offering though. You are offering the perspective that black communities are right to cause a stir, that ultimately pushes against white society, when in fact they are the biggest threats to themselves. If you are going to go after such a broad topic such as racism, the first thing you need to do is address the racism that the group you are preaching for is not doing the same thing.
 


A lot of you would do a lot of good for yourselves to listen to this young man, as he's dead on correct about what he says here.
 
It's sad that the black leadership is seduced into believing that all of their obstacles and all of the solutions to their problems are external. That's what I'd call disempowerment. The Civil Rights movement is regressing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clickhere 01
It's sad that the black leadership is seduced into believing that all of their obstacles and all of the solutions to their problems are external. That's what I'd call disempowerment. The Civil Rights movement is regressing.
Not all of them are. That is the narrative that you would think is true though. Many of them are very well aware of the real problems. The media though never focuses on them and instead gives men like Al Sharpton face time. The Civil Rights movement is regressing at this point in history.

Their external problems are the main causing point of many of these issues and the facts back that up. Anytime you try to convince someone who has the 'white guilt' over their head, they will simply ignore it. I've shut down so many of these conversations and done it easily because all I've done is use the truth. The Liberals have been zombified when it comes to this.
 
Lots to dig into here, and, as I alluded, I don't have a ton of time to discuss this with the length it deserves.

But it seems your primary focus is on blaming black communities for racism, crime, and not achieving success. Have you thought about why crime exists in black communities? Could it be because the low-income areas in which they've been traditionally "kept" (South Chicago, West Baltimore, East St Louis) have underfunded schools, unresponsive (or arbitrarily deadly) policing, underpaid public defenders, poverty taxes, rampant incarceration on non-violent charges, disproportionate non-access to higher education, disproportionate non-access to consistent high-wage employment, etc. etc. etc. "Black-on-black" crime occurs in poor, desperate neighborhoods because it is primarily black people living in these poor desperate neighborhoods. Generations of institutional racism and traditionally white governance (through traditionally white-led campaign contributions) have made it so these areas are well-defined, hard-to-escape (don't want all that black crime touching our constituency!), and bound to continue the cycle that envelops them today.

And that's not even touching on the fact that, even when educated at a similar level, minorities have a harder time winning jobs and being paid the same as white counterparts. Even having a "black-sounding name" is proven to be enough to keep candidates from interviews.

So, if you're a minority, what's the GD point? No one wants you to succeed- the system is designed that way. And even if you fight for the right to simply exist without having hatred and vitriol spewed at you, you get labeled a thug and race-baiter and "part of the problem."
 
You know what is funny is that the death of Malcolm X was a premonition of what was to come.
Lots to dig into here, and, as I alluded, I don't have a ton of time to discuss this with the length it deserves.

But it seems your primary focus is on blaming black communities for racism, crime, and not achieving success. Have you thought about why crime exists in black communities? Could it be because the low-income areas in which they've been traditionally "kept" (South Chicago, West Baltimore, East St Louis) have underfunded schools, unresponsive (or arbitrarily deadly) policing, underpaid public defenders, poverty taxes, rampant incarceration on non-violent charges, disproportionate non-access to higher education, disproportionate non-access to consistent high-wage employment, etc. etc. etc. "Black-on-black" crime occurs in poor, desperate neighborhoods because it is primarily black people living in these poor desperate neighborhoods. Generations of institutional racism and traditionally white governance (through traditionally white-led campaign contributions) have made it so these areas are well-defined, hard-to-escape (don't want all that black crime touching our constituency!), and bound to continue the cycle that envelops them today.

And that's not even touching on the fact that, even when educated at a similar level, minorities have a harder time winning jobs and being paid the same as white counterparts. Even having a "black-sounding name" is proven to be enough to keep candidates from interviews.

So, if you're a minority, what's the GD point? No one wants you to succeed- the system is designed that way. And even if you fight for the right to simply exist without having hatred and vitriol spewed at you, you get labeled a thug and race-baiter and "part of the problem."
Who is mostly in control of those areas? Republicans or Democrats? What about 69% of black youth being without their fathers? What about the self promotion of gangster pride, shooting, degrading women, and focusing ONLY on money in their chosen preference music, that is guess what? Promoted, created, and sold by them. Are you also going to claim that 'white governance' is automatically white oppression? The getting paid as well as their counterparts is BS, by the way. Companies can lose lots more money by making practice of that. I've also seen very legit firings, suddenly turned into racial bigotry on multiple occasions. What about Baltimore? New Orleans? Detroit? Memphis? All cities ran by black governance. What do you have to say about that?

So you are in fact one of these white people that claim that black people are still slaves? Ask Barack Obama what he thinks of that. Colin Powell, 70% of the NFL, my black general manager, etc, etc.

Again, you dodged my question. What is your experience with the black community.
 
Last edited:
So, if you're a minority, what's the GD point? No one wants you to succeed- the system is designed that way. And even if you fight for the right to simply exist without having hatred and vitriol spewed at you, you get labeled a thug and race-baiter and "part of the problem."

The Student Body President at Mizzou is a black man. He's the guy who claimed someone yelled a hate word from a pickup truck to justify all this, and he also spread false rumors about the KKK being on campus.

So, here's a guy who somehow succeeded in the system and yet he's protesting the system, and inciting panic. Seems he's his own worst enemy.

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/11...preading-false-rumor-kkk-was-on-campus-272739
 
You beat me to it, and said it better.
Though that may be true, it is highly unlikely the conservatives would have made this into the story that it has become. The liberal media, and I say that knowing there is also a conservative media, was on top of this story right from the get go. The one key paragraph I found in this editorial was this. It has me thinking about this situation in a totally different light now. I do wonder if there is some truth to it.

“Cry Wolfe!” is how this entire episode should be remembered. Liberal academics talked black kids into crying wolf over racially tinged rude behavior so an unpopular president would be unseated."
 
Though that may be true, it is highly unlikely the conservatives would have made this into the story that it has become. The liberal media, and I say that knowing there is also a conservative media, was on top of this story right from the get go. The one key paragraph I found in this editorial was this. It has me thinking about this situation in a totally different light now. I do wonder if there is some truth to it.

“Cry Wolfe!” is how this entire episode should be remembered. Liberal academics talked black kids into crying wolf over racially tinged rude behavior so an unpopular president would be unseated."

Hard saying, and not out of the question, but I am totally out of the loop on this story, and will remain so willingly.
 
Not all of them are. That is the narrative that you would think is true though. Many of them are very well aware of the real problems. The media though never focuses on them and instead gives men like Al Sharpton face time. The Civil Rights movement is regressing at this point in history.

Their external problems are the main causing point of many of these issues and the facts back that up. Anytime you try to convince someone who has the 'white guilt' over their head, they will simply ignore it. I've shut down so many of these conversations and done it easily because all I've done is use the truth. The Liberals have been zombified when it comes to this.
Excellent.

Does anyone else remember a rather influential member of black society named Malcolm X? His real name was Malcolm Little, and he grew up in Omaha Nebraska. He later changed his name to el-Hajj Malik el-Shabazz, when he joined the Nation of Islam.
As what may or may not be popular understanding, he became disenchanted with them. This was mostly due to their overly controlling aspects, and that he didn't agree with their direction, which was led by Elijah Muhammad. He also believed that Elijah was preaching his own version of Islam and not the true version. What he believed to be the true version, and what that actually meant as a whole is hard to decipher.
Louis X, who would later on to be more known for his name Louis Farrakhan has always been a prime suspect in ordering it to happen. Especially after calling for Malcolms head after he left the Nation of Islam. The same blame was also placed on Elijah Muhammad. Though it has never been known to be sure. The only thing known is that it was indeed committed by Nation of Islam members.
The point I'm making is that, for some reason, black America has always been somewhat self destructive. Even one of their most famous and prominent members in their history was killed by their own.
This is a point of their history and their present that needs to be addressed. I also do not agree that external problems, in this day and age mind you, are their main issues.
 
Hard saying, and not out of the question, but I am totally out of the loop on this story, and will remain so willingly.
I can understand that, as it is sometimes better to stay out of the way and not add to the confusion. A situation like this has so many unknown factors that it's hard to know exactly what is going on, and perhaps standing back and letting it resolve itself is best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moral_victory
Excellent.

Does anyone else remember a rather influential member of black society named Malcolm X? His real name was Malcolm Little, and he grew up in Omaha Nebraska. He later changed his name to el-Hajj Malik el-Shabazz, when he joined the Nation of Islam.
As what may or may not be popular understanding, he became disenchanted with them. This mostly due to their overly controlling aspects, and that he didn't agree with their direction, which was led by Elijah Muhammad. He also believed that Elijah was preaching his own version of Islam and not the true version. What he believed to be the true version, and what that actually meant as a whole is hard to decipher.
Louis X, who would later on to be more known for his name Louis Farrakhan has always been a prime suspect in ordering it to happen. especially after calling for Malcolms head after he left the Nation of Islam. The same blame was also placed on Elijah Muhammad. Though it has never been known to be sure. The only thing known is that it was indeed committed by Nation of Islam members.
The point I'm making is that, for some reason, black America has always been somewhat self destructive. Even one of their most famous and prominent members in their history was killed by their own.
This is a point of their history and their present that needs to be addressed. I also do not agree that external problems, in this day and age mind you, are their main issues.

I have to throw the flag.

A lot of influential white dudes have been killed by other white dudes too.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT