We know what they believed. The point is what they believed was wrong. That really should condemn the whole enterprise. But religion is like Trump, believers will always make an excuse for it.Notice he said believed, not "knew".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We know what they believed. The point is what they believed was wrong. That really should condemn the whole enterprise. But religion is like Trump, believers will always make an excuse for it.Notice he said believed, not "knew".
We know what they believed. The point is what they believed was wrong. That really should condemn the whole enterprise. But religion is like Trump, believers will always make an excuse for it.
Obvious? Violations? Lol.Obvious violations of the 2nd, 6th, 7th, 9th, 10th and 12th commandments...
You have no idea if Paul got anything right. That’s just your hope.Paul got a lot more right than he ever did wrong. There's a reason Jesus spoke in parables. Greater truth must be ascertained through diligence and perhaps some trial and error. It's part of the sanctification process. That's the beauty of Christianity.
Regardless, none of it is a compelling repudiation of the whole enterprise. You are blinded by your hatred of religion. If you applied those same standards of infallibility to science or liberalism, both would have been deep-sixed a long time ago.
Cool thing about all this is with respect to religion you can say, “I’m right because my faith tells me so. The others? Little different.Paul got a lot more right than he ever did wrong. There's a reason Jesus spoke in parables. Greater truth must be ascertained through diligence and perhaps some trial and error. It's part of the sanctification process. That's the beauty of Christianity.
Regardless, none of it is a compelling repudiation of the whole enterprise. You are blinded by your hatred of religion. If you applied those same standards of infallibility to science or liberalism, both would have been deep-sixed a long time ago.
Cool thing about all this is with respect to religion you can say, “I’m right because my faith tells me so. The others? Little different.
Ok.Not exactly. Faith is not fantasy, nor is it interchangeable with common sense or sound reasoning.
I believe, for example, there is compelling evidence for the resurrection of Jesus. Frankly, when you look at historical evidence for people and events accepted as true throughout antiquity, it takes a lot of faith to believe the eye witness testimony of five-hundred people and the numerous people who wouldn't recant to avoid torture and death were all a scam.
You must believe all religions are true, because they all have the same evidence.Not exactly. Faith is not fantasy, nor is it interchangeable with common sense or sound reasoning.
I believe, for example, there is compelling evidence for the resurrection of Jesus. Frankly, when you look at historical evidence for people and events accepted as true throughout antiquity, it takes a lot of faith to believe the eye witness testimony of five-hundred people and the numerous people who wouldn't recant to avoid torture and death were all a scam.
Actually, the authors of the new testament were right about a lot of things. Luke's work, for instance, would be considered one of the most reliable historical accounts if it were secular.You have no idea if Paul got anything right. That’s just your hope.
There are actually surprising historical errors in the New Testament which points to them not being written by eye witnesses. But history accuracy isn’t the issue. It’s the supernatural accuracy that is in question.Actually, the authors of the new testament were right about a lot of things. Luke's work, for instance, would be considered one of the most reliable historical accounts if it were secular.
Minor differences from Judaism or Islam. It’s really more of a hero cult than a separate religion.All religions are NOT the same. Only Christianity
proclaims that God created the universe and still
sustains it. Only Christianity proclaims that death
has been defeated by the resurrection of Jesus
Christ. and that He shares that victory with all who
believe in Him.
There are actually surprising historical errors in the New Testament which points to them not being written by eye witnesses.
But history accuracy isn’t the issue. It’s the supernatural accuracy that is in question.
There are actually surprising historical errors in the New Testament which points to them not being written by eye witnesses. But history accuracy isn’t the issue. It’s the supernatural accuracy that is in question.
Like what?
https://christiananswers.net/q-aiia/census-luke2.htmlThe Census of Quirinius occurred 9 years after Herod’s death. Luke uses the census as the basis for Joseph and Mary return to Judea
I think that’s basically true. If you just made Jesus a human prophet or philosopher, the story is more useful. Thomas Jefferson wrote a version of the Bible that did this essentially. The magic screws up the message.Much wasn't written by first-hand eye witnesses, but through interviews of witnesses. What many folks don't understand is the tradition of oral conveyance. Stories were told over and over again throughout history with great detail and accuracy. Sure, there can be errors, but this was how History was often documented; through oral tradition.
Yes, that will always be the issue and man's hi-jacking via "religious procedure" will continue to thwart any positives from Jesus' message. It's been my experience folks don't take issue with Jesus, they take issue with religion and man's weaponization of the Bible.
I think that’s basically true. If you just made Jesus a human prophet or philosopher, the story is more useful. Thomas Jefferson wrote a version of the Bible that did this essentially. The magic screws up the message.
So if I end up in the sky with a bunch of goddamn zombies, it’s the Second Coming?“
For the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a cry of command, with the voice of an archangel, and with the sound of the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we will always be with the Lord.
”
Pretty hard to explain this away.
No one will "end up in the sky". If you're sincerely curious, I recommend reading Heaven by Randy Alcorn. I used to dread the afterlife--imagined singing boring hymns while playing a harp floating on a cloud. After reading that book (more like an encyclopedia), I'm actually pretty excited.So if I end up in the sky with a bunch of goddamn zombies, it’s the Second Coming?
No thanks, I’ll pass.
I was mostly joking. I’m pretty agnostic. I believe the universe was created intentionally and intelligently, but I do not believe any human beings have the capacity to actually understand how and that all religions are basically attempts to fill in that gap in knowledge with stories that make us feel better collectively.No one will "end up in the sky". If you're sincerely curious, I recommend reading Heaven by Randy Alcorn. I used to dread the afterlife--imagined singing boring hymns while playing a harp floating on a cloud. After reading that book (more like an encyclopedia), I'm actually pretty excited.
Again, it shouldn't be hard to believe in an unimaginable afterlife from the same God who spoke us into existence. Existing outside the confines of time with unfathomable resources is pretty exciting to say the least.
Countless rituals and even doctrines aren't actually IN Scripture.The rapture isn’t biblical. John Darby came up with the idea in the 1830s. Apologies to Kirk Cameron.
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were illiterate, and didn't actually author the "books" that use their names. Those collections of stories were written by multiple people and sources, and they were given those "names" much later.Thomas Jefferson cut out some of the verses in
the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.
He removed all the miracles of Jesus and focused
on the teachings of Jesus. He was impressed with
the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew.
Bottom Line: Thomas Jefferson did not believe that
Jesus was the Son of God. However, Jefferson often
referred to himself as a Christian because he tried
to follow the teachings of Christ..
So if I end up in the sky with a bunch of goddamn zombies, it’s the Second Coming?
No thanks, I’ll pass.
Minor differences from Judaism or Islam. It’s really more of a hero cult than a separate religion.