Excuse me, liable.He wasn't convicted, you fool!
And I am sure that distinction matters to you so much.
Excuse me, liable.He wasn't convicted, you fool!
Like it or not it is a legal distinction isn’t it?Excuse me, liable.
And I am sure that distinction matters to you so much.
Sorry, but this is just wrong. Polls were showing that Hillary was WAY ahead and Trump had basically a zero chance.
LINK - Hillary with double digit lead
Please link your info.....
I was joking - the only "hellholes" to me really are the boring beige suburban upper middle class suburbs that ring our mid-sized metro areas. They are soulless.What if I told you there are not two houses that look like each other within miles of each other on my county road?
( and the only two I'm thinking of are giant old white farm houses)
I know. That's how I knew you would appreciate the no two alike. I remember our time together ❤️ 😄I was joking - the only "hellholes" to me really are the boring beige suburban upper middle class suburbs that ring our mid-sized metro areas. They are soulless.
I know that, but he has a pretty good reputation and has traditionally been considered one of the more right-leaning pollsters out there.Luntz isn't a Trump supporter, but he's also probably not wrong.
I know. That's how I knew you would appreciate the no two alike. I remember our time together ❤️ 😄
It’s where real live Americans live long and prosper!I was joking - the only "hellholes" to me really are the boring beige suburban upper middle class suburbs that ring our mid-sized metro areas. They are soulless.
He does need better toupees though.I know that, but he has a pretty good reputation and has traditionally been considered one of the more right-leaning pollsters out there.
Reopening the Hillary investigation by Comey, at Trump's urging, is what won the election for Turd.We've been over this a million times. The 2016 polls were very accurate.
They showed Trump had about a 20% chance of winning but only if he squeaked out narrow victories in every swing state while still losing the popular vote.
Guess what happened?
I don’t think it helped but I don’t believe it was the kill shot.Reopening the Hillary investigation by Comey, at Trump's urging, is what won the election for Turd.
Really is that simple. And I believe that late action by Comey is what spurred Democrats to promote early/absentee voting in 2020.
Luntz gained fame and notoriety from his constant appearances on Fox Opinion Network in 2016/2020.I know that, but he has a pretty good reputation and has traditionally been considered one of the more right-leaning pollsters out there.
You started off pretty close.This reminds me of the Obama surge - when the young, minority and women swing in your direction its hard to stop the train.
That was back when the electorate cared about such things.I don’t think it helped but I don’t believe it was the kill shot.
Her campaign not making final pushes in Wisconsin and some other Great Lakes/Midwest really hurt her.
Harris “knocked’’em dead” yesterday in ATL. Trumpf looks like a dottering old fool compared to Ms. Harris. He will not debate her “one on one”…….Vance is a liability at this point, too.Maga land is in full meltdown mode. The panic is something to witness.
I mean Overall, whites2 made up 76.3% of the record 131 million people3 who voted in November’s presidential election, while blacks made up 12.1%, Hispanics 7.4% and Asians 2.5%.4 (Pew Hispanic Center, 2009).You started off pretty close.
Body-ody-ody-ody-ody-ody-ody-ody (ah, ah, ah ah)Harris “knocked’’em dead” yesterday in ATL. Trumpf looks like a dottering old fool compared to Ms. Harris. He will not debate her “one on one”…….Vance is a liability at this point, too.
Checks notes at work... (You know that's a place one has to go to earn an income) ... nope we don't keep voting records for Colorado in Florida here.So no examples. Thanks!
I'm going out on a limb here but I feel most people would say that voting more than once for a person qualifies as support for them, no?I’m also a moderate Republican but aside from not supporting Trump I consider myself a conservative with some moderate views.
I’ve never considered that you might have more than one username.
Harris “knocked’’em dead” yesterday in ATL. Trumpf looks like a dottering old fool compared to Ms. Harris. He will not debate her “one on one”…….Vance is a liability at this point, too.
Absolutely it is.Like it or not it is a legal distinction isn’t it?
He's exhibit A of why it's going to get stupid this fall
It's funny both sides think we're living in Idiocracy, and both sides can make a case that the other is a threat to democracy.Get stupid. . . It's been stupid for a long time now.
Idiocracy has come to life. The only difference is president Camacho was a smarter than Trump.
It's funny both sides think we're living in Idiocracy, and both sides can make a case that the other is a threat to democracy.
Oh boy, making up stupid words to call people…this guyO boy , doofus..... this guy...
I will accept the results as valid either way…if nobody who loses does, why bother? Thank Agent Orange for this…The fact is neither side is going to accept the election results if their candidate loses.
I disagree. Democrats will accept them when the election is over and Trump has more EC votes. What we won’t accept is Kamala winning a state and that stat not certifying her win. Cheating. Republicans have already shown they won’t accept any Trump loss if he cries about it. I think Democrats should get the benefit of the doubt after the last time.The fact is neither side is going to accept the election results if their candidate loses.
The fact is neither side is going to accept the election results if their candidate loses.
I meant as far as the likelihood of social unrest and rioting are considered.That's a lame "both sides" statement. Yes, especially given the aggressive moves by the GOP to limit access to voting in the name of "fraud prevention" the left will demonstrate a much higher protesting of the results than usual. However, given the contrast between the 2016 and 2020 ending - and I hope you are fair minded enough to accept the differences are stark - I can't imagine you won't admit the likely reaction to Harris losing will be significantly different than the reaction to Trump losing.
Here is one thing I guarantee. Should Harris lose, she will give the same kind of gracious concession speech that we typically see, and this will have a softening effect on the nationwide reaction. If Trump loses, he will never concede and this will, just like in 2020, have an incendiary on his supporters.
Either side will be upset. That is where the resemblance will end.
It's still rape. As the judge said.Like it or not it is a legal distinction isn’t it?
So your negative view of ballot box voting isn't rooted in any tangible reality. Thanks!Checks notes at work... (You know that's a place one has to go to earn an income) ... nope we don't keep voting records for Colorado in Florida here.
She had a 71% chance of winning and Trump had a 30% chance. She was WAY ahead according to all who were looking at it.
Hillary had a 3.6% lead and 71% chance of winning, taking all polls on balance.
You are not a moderate Republican. You’re a STAUNCH Republican. If you were moderate you wouldn’t have ripped Biden nonstop as you’re already doing with Kamala. You’re not fooling anyone with that moderate crap. You. Moderate. Holy hell.I’m also a moderate Republican but aside from not supporting Trump I consider myself a conservative with some moderate views.
I’ve never considered that you might have more than one username.
Ragnar is a MODERATE REPUBLICAN, by the way. You are FAR RIGHT of him.Well, now that you say you didn’t start out in the middle?
None. I’ll look at your posts with a clearer understanding from now on. Thanks!