Good for her, but sad that democrats are back to zero people that care about family values. Now they will get even worse.
![993648.gif](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fs3media.247sports.com%2FUploads%2FAssets%2F648%2F993%2F993648.gif&hash=5279bc3270e58340e045eaeb98f0054c)
Good for her, but sad that democrats are back to zero people that care about family values. Now they will get even worse.
Well done. Mea culpa.Oh look a straw man comment and post devoid of any real intellectual contribution.
To avoid this myself, just a reminder the magic number for the New York Mets is 1. At least I adddd something of substance.
It's not that we want God out of this country its that we understand that it doesn't belong in the government. If you want a theocracy you might want to look towards the Middle East to see how that is working for them.The GOP is the only party that shows they care for family values. Sure, you can call it a monopoly if that is what you are asking. The democrats can't get God out of this country fast enough.
They want to cut food stamps, Social Security, and oppose support for family planning.The GOP is the only party that shows they care for family values. Sure, you can call it a monopoly if that is what you are asking. The democrats can't get God out of this country fast enough.
By doing what she did, she exercised her individual rights. You progressives didn't want her to do it.
I thought liberals were for less people going to jail for non-violent crimes.LOL...there's no "right" to refuse to follow the law. If she was engaging in civil disobedience, she would still be in jail refusing to issue any licenses.
I thought liberals were for less people going to jail for non-violent crimes.
You to grumpy today to carry on a conversation with I am going to go back and watch some more games.You really don't understand the concept of civil disobedience, do you? Do some research and get back to me. See if a light blinks on.
You to grumpy today to carry on a conversation with I am going to go back and watch some more games.
We've been through the definition of bigot before. And it lined up real well with both parties. Some, like you, apparently pick and choose parts of the definition to warm your fuzzies.Truth in advertising. She knows which party is the bigot party.
Really? Then why is Obama picking and choosing which laws to enforce?LOL...there's no "right" to refuse to follow the law. If she was engaging in civil disobedience, she would still be in jail refusing to issue any licenses.
just keep in mind IMCC once posted this in a discussion -LOL...there's no "right" to refuse to follow the law. If she was engaging in civil disobedience, she would still be in jail refusing to issue any licenses.
Usually.I thought liberals were for less people going to jail for non-violent crimes.
Bigotry isn't a family value.Good for her, but sad that democrats are back to zero people that care about family values. Now they will get even worse.
Bigotry isn't a family value.
(not worth the effort)Hey Red, does the definition of bigotry stick to anyone on the left?
"intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself."
No, we're fine with her exercising her rights to go to the party she is more comfortable with, we just happen to think she doesn't get to limit other people's constitutional rights while being paid as a government employee.