ADVERTISEMENT

Kim Davis is now a registered Republican

Good for her, but sad that democrats are back to zero people that care about family values. Now they will get even worse.
993648.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joes Place
The GOP is the only party that shows they care for family values. Sure, you can call it a monopoly if that is what you are asking. The democrats can't get God out of this country fast enough.
It's not that we want God out of this country its that we understand that it doesn't belong in the government. If you want a theocracy you might want to look towards the Middle East to see how that is working for them.

Which God takes precedence? There are a multitude of religions represented in The USA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
The GOP is the only party that shows they care for family values. Sure, you can call it a monopoly if that is what you are asking. The democrats can't get God out of this country fast enough.
They want to cut food stamps, Social Security, and oppose support for family planning.

They oppose increasing the minimum wage.

They don't support comparable pay for women.

They want to get rid of the Education department, replace science with creationism and prayers in schools, and get rid of the EPA so that we can have more pollution that harms kids.

They think the problem with teenage girls having kids out of wedlock is the out of wedlock part.

And the list goes on.

Oh yeah, definitely the party of family values.
 
LOL...there's no "right" to refuse to follow the law. If she was engaging in civil disobedience, she would still be in jail refusing to issue any licenses.
I thought liberals were for less people going to jail for non-violent crimes.
 
You really don't understand the concept of civil disobedience, do you? Do some research and get back to me. See if a light blinks on.
You to grumpy today to carry on a conversation with I am going to go back and watch some more games.
 
Truth in advertising. She knows which party is the bigot party.
We've been through the definition of bigot before. And it lined up real well with both parties. Some, like you, apparently pick and choose parts of the definition to warm your fuzzies.
 
LOL...there's no "right" to refuse to follow the law. If she was engaging in civil disobedience, she would still be in jail refusing to issue any licenses.
Really? Then why is Obama picking and choosing which laws to enforce?
 
LOL...there's no "right" to refuse to follow the law. If she was engaging in civil disobedience, she would still be in jail refusing to issue any licenses.
just keep in mind IMCC once posted this in a discussion -

IMCC965 said:
I don't want to read legal mumbo jumbo. Explain to me in YOUR own words why marriage is a "right"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT