They don’t want to be in a conference with dirty cheaters, like you.Michigan turned us is in? Michigan?
Well I have now officially seen it all.
But we are in the Big Ten which is really awesome. It sure would suck to be in some second rate conference like the ACC that nobody cares about.They don’t want to be in a conference with dirty cheaters, like you.
Yes.
Oh no, Br’r Fox. Don’t disparage the ACC. I simply can’t take it.But we are in the Big Ten which is really awesome. It sure would suck to be in some second rate conference like the ACC that nobody cares about.
So Michigan turned us in and we are trying to stay ahead of it? Hilarious...
Michigan... of all teams.
I know we always joke about this stuff but it's like the elite teams do something wrong and nothing happens. The above average team does something wrong... death. Or in this game a suspension with further investigation.
It’s not so much about asking if he belongs, I think he does and I think it’s a pretty easy case….it’s that the HOF has a set criteria requiring a .600 winning percentage.It is.
Dudes are worried about how this will play into his chance at .600% for the HOF. He won't get credit for the win, on guy casually threw out "suspending him" for Ohio state so he doesn't have to take the L.
Ill take a ton of heat for this but if you are 25 years in and you still have to ask if a guy should be in the HOF, the answer is no.
I remember when Jeremy Bloom had to give up his college football career so that he could earn the money he needed to pay for his Olympic skiing training. Good times for sure…..because it was always about the athletes. 🤦♂️Yes.
- a 2005-2008 Athlete.
When we couldn't even make money working camps as "college soccer players" it was straight up indentured servitude. We could make the school money, but God forbid we promote ourselves.
Counter point: dude has showed almost zero offensive evolution over 25 years. A 25 year time frame the game very heavy skewed towars rules to promote offense.It’s not so much about asking if he belongs, I think he does and I think it’s a pretty easy case….it’s that the HOF has a set criteria requiring a .600 winning percentage.
I disagree, but this is a very fair take.Counter point: dude has showed almost zero offensive evolution over 25 years. A 25 year time frame the game very heavy skewed towars rules to promote offense.
Phil Parker is a first ballot guy.
Michigan turned Iowa in. That’s laughable from those cheating aholes. They didn’t want Cade and moved on to JJ yet had to turn in Iowa to take the spotlight off of their massive constant cheating to win the B1G and Championship. F those guys.
Tapping phones now too w/o a warrant!!!How do we know it wasnt Brian Sanger with the Iowa DCI?
WHO?!?!? WHO DOESN'T WANT TO WEAR THE RIBBON?!?!?Ferentz/Budmayr:
Also makes me wonder how Kadyn Proctor knew he had a spot back at Alabama. I'm sure that was also on the up & up.Remember when Kentucky spent basically a whole season talking to CJ Frederick recruiting him to go play there and then he left and then no one batted an eye or questioned anything and nothing happened to them? Yeah, good times.
Michigan did not turn Iowa in, This is a result of Cade doing an interview with N.Y. Times and timeline of Iowa contacting him was discussed.
Absolutely. Only reason why I can think we didn't score as well. Very unfair.Is it safe to assume that they spotted the rule-breaking while they were spying on you guys? 🤔
How has this gone unappreciated for five hours?
Not to sure. If a NIL booster promises X amount of dollars to player for all 4 years and then as seconds thoughts after the first year who picks up the slack?This would solve a ton of problems with the way things are handled right now.