Left Wing Media Hosts
- Thread starter TC Nole OX
- Start date
If I "use human shields" but you just kill them to get to me, were they really human shields?
The idea of human shields is that if my opponent is moral and cares about innocent lives, when I use human shields my opponent won't be able to attack me because his morality says he can't disregard those innocent human lives.
How is that working?
In reality, the argument "they use human shields" always seems to be used to justify killing those human shields.
So much for morality and concern for innocent human lives.
Yes, yes, I understand some will be screaming "but those terrorists don't care for innocent human live, either!" And that's true. Does that mean we should be like them?
I don't understand why everyone doesn't agree with this. Seems obvious. And needs to be fixed.
I'd vote for Reich.
Unfortunately, while we could fix this, I have no hope that we will.
Meanwhile, it looks like COP28 will NOT agree to begin phasing out the use of fossil fuels. So that's another total failure in the face of obvious threat.
More and more it looks like it's going to get very ugly. Either it gets ugly because we have no choice but to fight to make things better, or it gets ugly because we fail to fight and let everything go to hell.
Do you see any other option? Do we wait for the 2024 election to decide what to do?
Closet MAGA Bill Maher
Family Guy creator Seth MacFarlane CRUSHES Bill Maher antivax nonsense
Family Guy creator Seth MacFarlane CRUSHES Bill Maher antivax nonsense
Do you think targeting militants who hide among civilians in actually analogous to assaulting a concert full of civilians?
That’s why your argument doesn’t hold much water.
If the Israelis went into Gaza with the same intentions that Hamas went into Israel there wouldn’t be any Palestinians still alive in Gaza.
And you know it.
