ADVERTISEMENT

Legit/real or not, WH tweet leaks are fantastic entertainment...

And another leader in the "Family Values" party is divorced (for over a year!)

How long before we find out he was doing something he shouldn't have?

 
More from SMA Grinston.

I hope people understand how incredible it is for military leaders to speak on things that contradict the stances of the WH. Also keep in mind, SMA's 1st priority is his soldiers (that's literally the SMA's job) and the Army has around 40% minority in our ranks. He needs to have this stand officially, for the betterment of the force. If he doesn't, that sends a very loud and clear message to his troops. The same applies to the comments I posted earlier from the USAF SMS.

 
  • Like
Reactions: mthawkeyes
In the least surprising turn of events ever...



And he already updated it...

 
How can any Christian support this man?

"I've done so much for religion"? Seriously? Anyone heard the term blasphemy?

 
  • Like
Reactions: Joes Place

Two new impeachable offenses:

  • Ordering an assault on peaceful demonstrators, exercising their 1A rights - for a photo op; no safety/security issue whatsoever. That's shitting on the Bill of Rights.
  • Arming unknown "officers" who are not police, national guard, or identified at all, but are being used simply to intimidate. No one knows who they report to, their training, etc. That's straight out of the Putin playbook. Barr and anyone else involved should be asked if they did this in front of Congress; if Barr refuses to answer, toss him in the Congressional jail and bring him back out in 2 days and ask again. Lather, Rinse, Repeat until you find out who ordered it. Because rogue militias being run by the WH or DOJ is not a legal/legitimate use of force. Natl Guard troops are for proper crowd control.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JupiterHawk
And CJCS...

I'm wondering if they all got together and decided "He can't fire all of us, right?"

And BTW, the language used is very deliberate and 100% on the money. Make no mistake, this is a jab. It looks like not that big of a deal, but I've read Field Grade/GO memos like this before. This is about as subversive as the Chief will ever get.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Joes Place
And CJCS...

I'm wondering if they all got together and decided "He can't fire all of us, right?"

And BTW, the language used is very deliberate and 100% on the money. Make no mistake, this is a jab. It looks like not that big of a deal, but I've read Field Grade/GO memos like this before. This is about as subversive as the Chief will ever get.


Is the 25th/Article 4 gonna get used here? We might be getting close....
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT