Take this crap elsewhereAre you serious? 800k dead Americans. They were not all 90 years old, this virus kills people. Get vaccinated.
Nobody outdipshits the Chips.Take this crap elsewhere
You sound like some little twat with a name like MoosemonsterNobody outdipshits the Chips.
And you sound like a guy with many chips on his shoulder. Just leave it alone.You sound like some little twat with a name like Moosemonster
snotknockerhawk said:I am dipshit....
2 of my close friends died from either covid or the shot so GFYS! A$$hole!snotknockerhawk said:
Wtf is happening? I don't understand all this covid shit....half my family has had it with mild symptoms....I also know a half dozen healthy people that has died from it... wtf is happening? Was Mark R not healthy? This sucks!
Remarkable that fewer than ten people have died "from the shot," but here you are as a close friend of one of them! Small world.2 of my close friends died from either covid or the shot so GFYS! A$$hole!
Well this is a flat out lie. How about we be realistic and say Covid is dangerous for people with co-morbidities and this therapeutic has caused the more injuries and deaths than all other vaccinations combined. These are facts. You saying less than 10 people is just flat out moronic, go look at the Vaers report.Remarkable that fewer than ten people have died "from the shot," but here you are as a close friend of one of them! Small world.
You don't understand what VAERS is, nor what are its shortcomings. From the VAERS website itself:Well this is a flat out lie. How about we be realistic and say Covid is dangerous for people with co-morbidities and this therapeutic has caused the more injuries and deaths than all other vaccinations combined. These are facts. You saying less than 10 people is just flat out moronic, go look at the Vaers report.
VAERS is a passive reporting system, meaning it relies on individuals to send in reports of their experiences to CDC and FDA. VAERS is not designed to determine if a vaccine caused a health problem, but is especially useful for detecting unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse event reporting that might indicate a possible safety problem with a vaccine.
Adverse events reported to VAERS are not necessarily side effects caused by vaccination. An adverse event is a health problem that happens after vaccination that may or may not be caused by a vaccine. These events may require further investigation. By definition, a side effect has been shown to be linked to a vaccine by scientific studies.
In interim analyses of surveillance of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, incidence of selected serious outcomes was not significantly higher 1 to 21 days postvaccination compared with 22 to 42 days postvaccination. While CIs were wide for many outcomes, surveillance is ongoing.
I can come up with just as many of those as you. All of this from you is garbage. Stop promoting this crap.You don't understand what VAERS is, nor what are its shortcomings. From the VAERS website itself:
Nobody who actually correctly uses the VAERS data has shown *any* such safety problem. Nobody.
And more from the CDC:
Here's a paper that describes an analysis of the VAERS data:
![]()
Surveillance for Adverse Events After COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination
This study reports an interim analysis of safety surveillance data of 23 serious outcomes following vaccination with 1 of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines based on comprehensive health records from a large US population.jamanetwork.com
and the results:
and a less sciency description: https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/does-vaers-list-deaths-caused-by-covid-19-vaccines
Please take the time to learn about VAERS and actual vaccine safety, and stop spreading misinformation. Then, reconsider your sources of information, because they are misleading you. Finally, don't call people "liars" and "moronic" until you've learned about the subject at hand.
I'm referencing the CDC. I'm referencing published scientific analyses. Are they all "promoting this crap?" I'd like to see your science-based references, and the data behind them, that indicate that any more than a handful of people have died from the COVID vaccinations. Thanks.I can come up with just as many of those as you. All of this from you is garbage. Stop promoting this crap.
Referencing the CDC at this point is your problem. Throw in the WHO as well.I'm referencing the CDC. I'm referencing published scientific analyses. Are they all "promoting this crap?" I'd like to see your science-based references, and the data behind them, that indicate that any more than a handful of people have died from the COVID vaccinations. Thanks.
(I'm guessing you didn't actually read anything I referenced)
So, the original post cites VAERS, which is managed by the CDC, as somehow evidence of the problems with the vaccine, but the CDC is not to be trusted. Do you think about what you write?Referencing the CDC at this point is your problem. Throw in the WHO as well.
This thread is for respecting Mark Reiland.Referencing the CDC at this point is your problem. Throw in the WHO as well.
Did you really just post this? Seriously think about it.So, the original post cites VAERS, which is managed by the CDC, as somehow evidence of the problems with the vaccine, but the CDC is not to be trusted. Do you think about what you write?
Content-free post. Care to explain just what seems to be your issue here? We're not all as smart as you.Did you really just post this? Seriously think about it.
And vice versaRIP to Mark Reiland and condolences to his friends and family.
Out of all of the places to post antivax rhetoric this seems like one of the least appropriate.
Believe what you want and I am just a hick from small town Iowa, but I personally know a 70 year old healthy male who broke down last week, got vaccinated (first shot), and felt like shit the next day. Went to the doctor, who said he reacted to the shot and was in acute liver failure. Sent him to Mayo in Rochester, where they said he needed to go on the transplant list from liver failure. He died before that happened. 1 shot and dead 72 hours later? I find it hard to believe he is the unlucky 1 out of 10 as you say. I am not an anti-vaxing mouth breather either. Believe what you want, but the internet is full of bulls%$t.Remarkable that fewer than ten people have died "from the shot," but here you are as a close friend of one of them! Small world.
2 of my close friends died from either covid or the shot so GFYS! A$$hole!
Well this is a flat out lie. How about we be realistic and say Covid is dangerous for people with co-morbidities and this therapeutic has caused the more injuries and deaths than all other vaccinations combined. These are facts. You saying less than 10 people is just flat out moronic, go look at the Vaers report.
78, and anyone who gave his post a “like”, is getting dog-walked. Anti-vaxxers are such embarrassing mental midgets.You don't understand what VAERS is, nor what are its shortcomings. From the VAERS website itself:
Nobody who actually correctly uses the VAERS data has shown *any* such safety problem. Nobody.
And more from the CDC:
Here's a paper that describes an analysis of the VAERS data:
![]()
Surveillance for Adverse Events After COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination
This study reports an interim analysis of safety surveillance data of 23 serious outcomes following vaccination with 1 of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines based on comprehensive health records from a large US population.jamanetwork.com
and the results:
and a less sciency description: https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/does-vaers-list-deaths-caused-by-covid-19-vaccines
Please take the time to learn about VAERS and actual vaccine safety, and stop spreading misinformation. Then, reconsider your sources of information, because they are misleading you. Finally, don't call people "liars" and "moronic" until you've learned about the subject at hand.