Hold on, I just learned the term "pube blockers" and I'm starting to wonder if this renders the 'courtesy trim' obsolete...What's your answer?
No more shaving, waxing, this could be the breakthrough this country truly needs to come together
.Matt Walsh - What is a Woman Trailer
- Thread starter alaskanseminole
- Start date
No more shaving, waxing, this could be the breakthrough this country truly needs to come together
.
I caught a video of his in the YouTube rabbit hole, a while back, about overtly woke/SJW scenes being interjected into modern children's/toddlers TV programs.
At the very least, it was funny watching his soul slowly leave his body with each passing scene.
It's "pubes," plural.Hold on, I just learned the term "pube blockers" and I'm starting to wonder if this renders the 'courtesy trim' obsolete...
No more shaving, waxing, this could be the breakthrough this country truly needs to come together
Gotta to block 'em all!
It's funny how fuzzy and noncommittal people like the good Dr. Forcier are regarding gender. They say "It's a constellation of things" or "It's whatever that person believes it to be."
Yet with things such as "puberty blockers" they speak with certainty and in absolute terms. "Puberty blockers, which are completely reversible and don't have permanent effects are wonderful," says Dr. Forcier.
Convenient combination, this lack of insight alternating with contrived certainty.
Yet with things such as "puberty blockers" they speak with certainty and in absolute terms. "Puberty blockers, which are completely reversible and don't have permanent effects are wonderful," says Dr. Forcier.
Convenient combination, this lack of insight alternating with contrived certainty.
That's what you got from that?
There's a lot to unpack in that clip (can't tell who is who w/o video, btw). For one I didn't hear anyone advocating anything...just stating the fact women are more fertile when they're young. Secondly, it's a false premise that people stayed married longer "back in the day" is a sign of better times. Divorce was socially taboo, so women stayed in unhealthy (often times unsafe) marriages because they had no other out (most were stay-at-home moms). So just because someone is celebrating their silver anniversary doesn't mean they've had a good marriage.
That said, I honestly don't know anything about Matt Walsh. First time I'd ever heard of him was in connection to my OP. ...and I still haven't watched his film.
He's not entirely wrong although his reasons for why this changed are missing the fact that education has taken on an increased importance AND length.
In the time when teenagers where getting married and having children it wasn't a big deal if you didn't finish high school. You could get a good job to support your family without a high school diploma. Now you not only need a high school diploma but you also likely need some sort of college or professional training after high school.
Add to that education/training costs more now than ever AND important things like home ownership are more expensive to obtain and starting adulthood takes longer.
That said I don't see any reason why people could not marry in their 20's if they meet the right person. Marriage helps your financial situation, not hurts it. So delaying until you have your financial situation totally figured out makes no sense.
i’m not sure what you think my takeaway was but i will say that his entire premise is creepy and groomerish.
walsh is the guy who says society just decided in the past 30 years that getting married at 16 was too young and then he went to imply that was an incorrect assumption. if you agree then that’s fine with me…
getting married in your 20s is fine. suggesting it’s in society’s best interest to promote teenage pregnancy on the other hand is creepy.
Society had higher, earlier expectations of people in the past.
Physiologically, our evolution has put our reproductive peak at an earlier age than we currently accept sociologically.
Our pace of technological evolution has lapped our physical evolution drawing our lifespans out. We’ve consequently drawn out our expectations for maturity and what comes with it.
Bobby married Ann when he was 19 and she was 16. Seemed to work out for them alright.
I'm not sure if he was suggesting that so much as saying that the issue with teenage pregnancy isn't their age so much as they are almost always unmarried and not in a financial position to care for a child.
I think he blames "extended adolescence" which may be true but the entire reason it is true is because of how much longer it takes to get a proper education and how much more resource intensive it is to begin independent life. I think a lot of times conservatives like to paint it as some sort of social/cultural problem with maturity when in reality it stems mostly from the financial/economic issues that are not in the control of the individual.
Obviously you haven’t seen it, he never actually says what a woman is, he goes and asks doctors/medical professionals/professors you know the experts we are all supposed to blindly follow, if they can define what is a woman.
It appears to me Matt Walsh probably should have attended college, there’s a decent chance he wouldn’t appear as such an idiot if he had. Who’s bankrolling this moron?
Similar threads
