ADVERTISEMENT

Minnesota becomes fourth state to offer universal free school meals

fredjr82

HB Legend
Nov 13, 2007
26,661
19,639
113
How refreshing from this State.

Starting this fall, students at Minnesota schools will get free meals regardless of their ability to pay.

A bill signed into law Friday, March 17, by Gov. Tim Walz provides more than $800 million in funding for school lunches and breakfasts over the next four years. A free meals program was one of the top priorities this session for the governor and Democratic-Farmer-Labor lawmakers, who say they want to craft a state budget that will prioritize education and families.

For the "children loving" Cons who "care" once their born?

Republican opponents of the bill raised concerns about the potential for waste and misappropriations. Others said the state would be better off spending money on improving reading and math scores. Sen. Steve Drazkowski, R-Mazeppa, got national attention for remarking on the Senate floor that he had never met a hungry Minnesotan.

“I have yet to meet a person in Minnesota that is hungry,” he said. “I have yet to meet a person in Minnesota that says they don’t have access to enough food to eat.”

Link
 
It's not free.

But I have no issues with this. We've come along way from decades past where free meals were one color punch card, reduced meals were another color punch card and full price payer was another color punch card. It still amzes me that the grown ups in charge were ok with a system that openly identified kids of need in an environment already tough enough for the kids to begin with.
 
It's not free.

But I have no issues with this. We've come along way from decades past where free meals were one color punch card, reduced meals were another color punch card and full price payer was another color punch card. It still amzes me that the grown ups in charge were ok with a system that openly identified kids of need in an environment already tough enough for the kids to begin with.
It would be pretty remarkable if we could apply that same logic to other problems and fix them too. What a world!!
 
Dems need to attack. Quit rewarding people that hate you. Rural people hate Dems. Don't vote for money for them.
 
It's not free.

But I have no issues with this. We've come along way from decades past where free meals were one color punch card, reduced meals were another color punch card and full price payer was another color punch card. It still amzes me that the grown ups in charge were ok with a system that openly identified kids of need in an environment already tough enough for the kids to begin with.
Who are you, and what have you done with Northern?
Seems like a far better use of money than private school welfare checks being issued to people.
THIS!
 
It's not free.

But I have no issues with this. We've come along way from decades past where free meals were one color punch card, reduced meals were another color punch card and full price payer was another color punch card. It still amzes me that the grown ups in charge were ok with a system that openly identified kids of need in an environment already tough enough for the kids to begin with.
What color was your punch ticket?
 
  • Like
Reactions: VodkaSam
Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong here, but would‘t this only help those who can afford to pay? The poor already receives free lunch, So now the middle class and wealthy don’t have to pay either. Raise the limit and allow more families closer to whatever economic line is already drawn. Allow those that have the means to pay, continue to pay, redirect those funds to the classrooms.
 
How refreshing from this State.

Starting this fall, students at Minnesota schools will get free meals regardless of their ability to pay.

A bill signed into law Friday, March 17, by Gov. Tim Walz provides more than $800 million in funding for school lunches and breakfasts over the next four years. A free meals program was one of the top priorities this session for the governor and Democratic-Farmer-Labor lawmakers, who say they want to craft a state budget that will prioritize education and families.

For the "children loving" Cons who "care" once their born?

Republican opponents of the bill raised concerns about the potential for waste and misappropriations. Others said the state would be better off spending money on improving reading and math scores. Sen. Steve Drazkowski, R-Mazeppa, got national attention for remarking on the Senate floor that he had never met a hungry Minnesotan.

“I have yet to meet a person in Minnesota that is hungry,” he said. “I have yet to meet a person in Minnesota that says they don’t have access to enough food to eat.”

Link
The repubs ain't wrong that trying to improve reading and math scores should be a focus. But if some of these these kids aren't coming to school with basic needs met, it's pointless. Bravo Minnesota.
 
Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong here, but would‘t this only help those who can afford to pay? The poor already receives free lunch, So now the middle class and wealthy don’t have to pay either. Raise the limit and allow more families closer to whatever economic line is already drawn. Allow those that have the means to pay, continue to pay, redirect those funds to the classrooms.
A similar ballot measure passed in my state. I voted against it for the reasons you mentioned. Seems to me the answer is to expand eligibility, not have taxpayers pick up the tab for students of families who can afford meals. Seems the same concept as the voucher programs, which I’m also against.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HawkeyeShawn
Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong here, but would‘t this only help those who can afford to pay? The poor already receives free lunch, So now the middle class and wealthy don’t have to pay either. Raise the limit and allow more families closer to whatever economic line is already drawn. Allow those that have the means to pay, continue to pay, redirect those funds to the classrooms.
I think the issue is the income level where free lunch kicks in is absurdly low ($17k-ish annual income for one child). Plus this needed proven by completing an application annually by anyone looking for assistance. This takes out any guess work, processing and administration of these applications. Great job by Minnesota.
 
My family was middle class growing up.

We always had a roof over our heads, but sometimes my mom didn’t have money for my lunches.

Nothing more embarrassing for a kid than that, I promise you.


Some kids only meals are school lunches.
 
Meals are free at all DM public schools. It’s been that way for a few years. They were giving away food during the pandemic as well by having people drive up to get breakfast and lunch. I feel bad for kids that don’t have parents that prioritize food for them in the form of breakfast, lunch, and dinner.
 
Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong here, but would‘t this only help those who can afford to pay? The poor already receives free lunch, So now the middle class and wealthy don’t have to pay either. Raise the limit and allow more families closer to whatever economic line is already drawn. Allow those that have the means to pay, continue to pay, redirect those funds to the classrooms.
Yes. But as far as handouts go this seems to be a beneficial one. Could justify it as part of public education expense and eliminate some issues of the kids knowing who is poor and who is not. As an Iowa resident and taxpayer I now get to subsidize private school tuition now which I find objectionable even though I have paid for and sent kids to private schools over the years.
 
Meals are free at all DM public schools. It’s been that way for a few years. They were giving away food during the pandemic as well by having people drive up to get breakfast and lunch. I feel bad for kids that don’t have parents that prioritize food for them in the form of breakfast, lunch, and dinner.
Who knew the solution to food insecurity was better priorities?
 
A similar ballot measure passed in my state. I voted against it for the reasons you mentioned. Seems to me the answer is to expand eligibility, not have taxpayers pick up the tab for students of families who can afford meals. Seems the same concept as the voucher programs, which I’m also against.

I'm thinking wealthier families ultimately pay for their kids meals by paying more income and property taxes than poorer people. The wealthier families also pick up the tab for the poor kid's meals.

Win/win.
 
I'm thinking wealthier families ultimately pay for their kids meals by paying more income and property taxes than poorer people. The wealthier families also pick up the tab for the poor kid's meals.

Win/win.
Yeah, while I voted against it I’m not upset it passed. Was on the fence.
I’d vote against vouchers every time though. That one pisses me off.
 
Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong here, but would‘t this only help those who can afford to pay? The poor already receives free lunch, So now the middle class and wealthy don’t have to pay either. Raise the limit and allow more families closer to whatever economic line is already drawn. Allow those that have the means to pay, continue to pay, redirect those funds to the classrooms.
I believe that it is being paid for by slightly raising taxes on the wealthy.

Now no kids will be stigmatized by proclaiming their poverty to get a free lunch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: General Tso
My family was middle class growing up.

We always had a roof over our heads, but sometimes my mom didn’t have money for my lunches.

Nothing more embarrassing for a kid than that, I promise you.


Some kids only meals are school lunches.
Should have eaten PBJ’s every day like I did instead of buying a lunch.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TarponSpringsNole
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT