I understand the sentiment but Republicans are the party of vindictive shit stains, let's not sink to their level
That's why Dems lose elections...they won't go as low as it takes.
I understand the sentiment but Republicans are the party of vindictive shit stains, let's not sink to their level
I'm very pleased to see this reaction from people. It was just a few years ago when my mother and this group couldn't get their school district to allow for what they called "Angel accounts" where people in the community could pay past due hot lunch balances so poor kids weren't removed from hot lunch lines and handed sack lunches. They had to get a law passed in Iowa requiring the school district (the alma mater I call mediocre for reasons like this) to allow for this because apparently some school administrators get draconian and vindictive when you make them bill collectors.Don’t see how anyone can argue against this
Agree. I’m against vouchers too.A similar ballot measure passed in my state. I voted against it for the reasons you mentioned. Seems to me the answer is to expand eligibility, not have taxpayers pick up the tab for students of families who can afford meals. Seems the same concept as the voucher programs, which I’m also against.
This has been part of our charity since my son was in 1st grade. We pay for his lunch and we donate the same amount to cover anyone that falls behind.I'm very pleased to see this reaction from people. It was just a few years ago when my mother and this group couldn't get their school district to allow for what they called "Angel accounts" where people in the community could pay past due hot lunch balances so poor kids weren't removed from hot lunch lines and handed sack lunches. They had to get a law passed in Iowa requiring the school district (the alma mater I call mediocre for reasons like this) to allow for this because apparently some school administrators get draconian and vindictive when you make them bill collectors.
The repubs ain't wrong that trying to improve reading and math scores should be a focus. But if some of these these kids aren't coming to school with basic needs met, it's pointless. Bravo Minnesota.
I've been saying this for years. Thousands of children have such crappy home lives and are in a survival mode constantly, what they score on a math test means nothing to them. When I taught BD I would tell the kids I would buy them a 12 pack of pop of their choice if they were proficient on any of the state tests. It would at least get them to try their best. Otherwise they just felt like it was a waste of their time.Agreed the test scores are the end game for both parties. If a child doesn't know where they'll sleep that night or where their next meal comes from, test scores will be of little interest foe the child.
I've been saying this for years. Thousands of children have such crappy home lives and are in a survival mode constantly, what they score on a math test means nothing to them. When I taught BD I would tell the kids I would buy them a 12 pack of pop of their choice if they were proficient on any of the state tests. It would at least get them to try their best. Otherwise they just felt like it was a waste of their time.
Same as trying to judge teachers on test scores when they have different clientele. They were looking at PE when NCLB came out and the way my schedule was set up I could have kids 1st quarter of 7th grade. Then NOT get them again until 4th quarter of 8th grade. But I was supposed to be held accountable for their fitness scores. It's ridiculous in so many places.
Makes sense, but then what is your solution? Simply let the kids get away with not trying and just pass them along to the next grade? Seems like excuses are more prevalent than solutions.I've been saying this for years. Thousands of children have such crappy home lives and are in a survival mode constantly, what they score on a math test means nothing to them. When I taught BD I would tell the kids I would buy them a 12 pack of pop of their choice if they were proficient on any of the state tests. It would at least get them to try their best. Otherwise they just felt like it was a waste of their time.
Same as trying to judge teachers on test scores when they have different clientele. They were looking at PE when NCLB came out and the way my schedule was set up I could have kids 1st quarter of 7th grade. Then NOT get them again until 4th quarter of 8th grade. But I was supposed to be held accountable for their fitness scores. It's ridiculous in so many places.
And the real Northern is back.Maybe if you wouldn't provide kids with "a 12 pack of pop of their choice" they'd do better with their "fitness scores"
It's like you don't read good.Maybe if you wouldn't provide kids with "a 12 pack of pop of their choice" they'd do better with their "fitness scores"
It's like you don't read good.
I agree with you and that's a rarity. There's just so much more to it than people realize. It's a HUGE dilemma. Laws need to be written/changed. As a society, we are failing our young people too often.Makes sense, but then what is your solution? Simply let the kids get away with not trying and just pass them along to the next grade? Seems like excuses are more prevalent than solutions.
Makes sense, but then what is your solution? Simply let the kids get away with not trying and just pass them along to the next grade?
“I have yet to meet a person in Minnesota that is hungry,” he said. “I have yet to meet a person in Minnesota that says they don’t have access to enough food to eat.”
Link
This is bulls!t. Those 6-year old kids need to learn their keep.
No, Iowa is going one better. Just eliminate the public schools and there is no chance of a kid going to public school hungry.No Brainer. Well done. Iowa should do this.
You call it pop? GFYI've been saying this for years. Thousands of children have such crappy home lives and are in a survival mode constantly, what they score on a math test means nothing to them. When I taught BD I would tell the kids I would buy them a 12 pack of pop of their choice if they were proficient on any of the state tests. It would at least get them to try their best. Otherwise they just felt like it was a waste of their time.
Same as trying to judge teachers on test scores when they have different clientele. They were looking at PE when NCLB came out and the way my schedule was set up I could have kids 1st quarter of 7th grade. Then NOT get them again until 4th quarter of 8th grade. But I was supposed to be held accountable for their fitness scores. It's ridiculous in so many places.
Yeah. They ought to be able to buy lunch.In Arkansas, they now can by working the overnight shifts at the slaughterhouses
0/10It’s Bernie Sanders and Nina Turner’s policies that causes bad parents. This is why we have free school lunches. Bad parents want everything for free.
Of course they would.Great platform, Republicans.
Republicans Declare Banning Universal Free School Meals a 2024 Priority
As states across the country move to make sure students are well fed, Republicans have announced their intention to fight back.newrepublic.com
Republicans won't campaign on it, it will just be a policy priority if they're able to win. Democrats of course will make no attempt at all to use this as an issue to bash the Republicans. Need to talk about the prescription drugs and the infrastructure bills.Great platform, Republicans.
Republicans Declare Banning Universal Free School Meals a 2024 Priority
As states across the country move to make sure students are well fed, Republicans have announced their intention to fight back.newrepublic.com
Why? The left on this board trips over themselves everyday whining about corporate welfare and low taxes for the rich, why is giving free food to rich kids paid for by taxes from the poor and middle class a fair idea?No Brainer. Well done. Iowa should do this.
When will you learn that lesson?Yes! Pull themselves up by their bootstraps!
When will you learn that lesson?
Damn, man....How refreshing from this State.
Starting this fall, students at Minnesota schools will get free meals regardless of their ability to pay.
A bill signed into law Friday, March 17, by Gov. Tim Walz provides more than $800 million in funding for school lunches and breakfasts over the next four years. A free meals program was one of the top priorities this session for the governor and Democratic-Farmer-Labor lawmakers, who say they want to craft a state budget that will prioritize education and families.
For the "children loving" Cons who "care" once their born?
Republican opponents of the bill raised concerns about the potential for waste and misappropriations. Others said the state would be better off spending money on improving reading and math scores. Sen. Steve Drazkowski, R-Mazeppa, got national attention for remarking on the Senate floor that he had never met a hungry Minnesotan.
“I have yet to meet a person in Minnesota that is hungry,” he said. “I have yet to meet a person in Minnesota that says they don’t have access to enough food to eat.”
Link
Damn, man....
Some rich MN lawyer isn't gonna be able to upgrade the rims on his 2025 BMW SUV order & get the "undercoating" package because of this crap!!!
SO WRONG!!!!
You obviously have never seen me.When will you stop being fat?
You obviously have never seen me.
Of course they would.
They are almost caroonishly evil at this point.