ADVERTISEMENT

MN football players accused of sexual assult & more

OnceAhawk

HB MVP
Jan 29, 2015
1,644
637
113
This story just broke tonight and was posted on the Minnepols Star Tribune website:

University of Minnesota football players accused of sexual assault, harassment and retaliation

E-mail obtained by Star Tribune says complaints demonstrate “concerning pattern.”

By Brandon Stahl, Dan Browning and Emma Nelson Star Tribune
OCTOBER 15, 2015 — 6:24PM


University of Minnesota football players have been accused of sexual assault, sexual harassment and retaliation in the past academic year, but those allegations did not result in criminal charges, a university administrator said Thursday.

Kimberly Hewitt, the school’s director of equal opportunity and affirmative action, said in a July 16 e-mail to then-Athletic Director Norwood Teague that her office had concerns regarding complaints about football players, including two reports of sexual assault “committed by individual players,” two reports of sexual harassment involving “groups of football players” and a report of retaliation of involving “a group of football players.”

The e-mail was obtained Wednesday through a records request by the Star Tribune. In an interview Thursday, Hewitt said the concerns were raised over the course of the 2014-15 academic year. She refused to be more specific, saying that doing so could compromise student privacy. She declined to say how many players were involved, the number of alleged victims, where the alleged incidents occurred or to provide any other details. No police reports were filed, a university spokesman said.

The U’s general counsel refused Thursday to provide the numbers of complaints of sexual harassment and sexual assault reported since Sept. 1, 2014, involving allegations against football players, as well as the numbers of alleged victims. The general counsel’s office said that because fewer than five incidents of sexual assault and fewer than five incidents of harassment took place in that time frame, the data could lead to the identification of individuals and violation of their privacy rights.

Head football coach Jerry Kill said Thursday that he was aware of one allegation involving a current player that was referred to administrators and to police.

“I’ve taken care of the report that we received on a young man. We turned it into the administration and it was handled by the administration,” he said.


Asked if the concerns about the football team remain, Hewitt said, “I would say yes.”


Teague himself resigned in August over allegations of sexual harassment that took place at a leadership retreat on July 15 — the day before Hewitt sent her memo.


Some investigated, some not


One of the sexual harassment complaints involving football players was investigated by the university, Hewitt wrote in the e-mail. That investigation “determined that one player had violated the sexual harassment policy.” The retaliation complaint “found concerning behavior by football players, but there was no evidence to substantiate that the players had violated University policy,” she wrote.

The other complaints were not investigated, Hewitt wrote, because the reporting students did not want to go forward with an investigation. She said the U follows federal guidelines on reporting sexual assaults. It’s generally up to the student whether to file a police report. Exceptions may be made with repeat offenders or in cases of imminent threats, she said.


“Title IX requires the school to take reasonable steps to prevent future sexual [violence] and harassment after receiving a complaint, even when the complaining student chooses not to pursue an investigation,” Hewitt noted in her e-mail.


In her interview, she said that if the U determines there was a violation of university policies, then the individual found culpable would be disciplined.

Kill: ‘We take care of it’


In her July e-mail, Hewitt wrote that the number of complaints “demonstrates a concerning pattern of football player conduct that we believe requires responsive action.” She said that Kill was notified about the complaints.


In an interview Thursday, Kill initially said, “There’s nothing since I’ve been here. … If we have anything that I’m aware of that has to do with a lady or anything of that nature, I go through [senior associate athletic director] Dan O’Brien, [interim athletic director] Beth Goetz, and call the police.” He said in a follow-up interview that he knew of one incident he said was reported to police and administrators, and another incident involving a group of freshmen players. He said he didn’t have details about the latter.


“When something happens, we take care of it,” Kill said. “And if it’s a kid that’s guilty, he’s taken care of.”

Goetz said in a prepared statement Thursday that Hewitt “proactively contacted the Athletics Department to initiate discussions on whether reports of sexual assault and harassment constituted a broader pattern. All of these reports were fully investigated to the extent that they could be and the Office of Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action (EOAA) did not substantiate any sexual assault allegations. The EOAA Office substantiated one allegation of sexual harassment.


“A meeting was held between the athletics department and EOAA to determine whether additional educational efforts were needed and these discussions are ongoing. EOAA has independent authority to raise concerns and this is an example of that proactive system.


“One report of sexual assault or harassment is one too many and we took prompt, responsive action to investigate when notified of these reports. Coach Kill has a strong track record of dealing with student-athlete issues as soon as they arise,” she said.


The entire story is here: http://www.startribune.com/universi...assault-harassment-and-retaliation/333075411/
 
“And if it’s a kid that’s guilty, he’s taken care of.”
what does this mean? it's a little ambiguous.
 
I actually like the fact that they are keeping the anonymity of those involved. Once an individual is named as having a sexual assault accusation brought against them, they carry that title with them wherever they go, even if the accusation turns out to be bogus.

What I hope is not happening is that the alleged victims are being pressured to not bring these charges forward. We have seen that (allegedly) happen at many other schools (e.g., Notre Dame, Florida State, and Iowa with the Pierre Pierce fiasco).
 
I will NEVER understand this, not with this case, not with the Iowa/Satterfield/other guy case, not with any of them: Alleged victim: If you think a crime was committed, go to the police! School officials, including coaches: If the victim/family come to you, tell them to go to the police, and say nothing more.

I wish we had a group of people that investigate alleged crimes...oh, that's right, we do! The police!
 
Last edited:
I will NEVER understand this, not with this case, not with the Iowa/Satterfield/other guy case, not with any of them: Alleged victim: If you think a crime was committed, go to the police! School officials, including coaches: If the victim/family come to you, tell them to go to the police, and say nothing more.

I wish we had a group of people that investigate alleged crimes...oh, that's right, we do! The police!

Sometimes the police don't help or don't believe the victim (especially if victim was drunk). And sometimes, it's even worse if you go to the police.
 
I will NEVER understand this, not with this case, not with the Iowa/Satterfield/other guy case, not with any of them: Alleged victim: If you think a crime was committed, go to the police! School officials, including coaches: If the victim/family come to you, tell them to go to the police, and say nothing more.

I wish we had a group of people that investigate alleged crimes...oh, that's right, we do! The police!

It is the same with most people's jobs. There is a code of conduct at your job and if the company thinks you violated it they can punish you. As long as it is a fair system then I don't see a problem with it. Many people don't want to go to the police in that situation because it will be made public.
 
Of course, but most times the police handle things well. And, in any event, is there reason to believe, on average, a university is going to handle things better than the police?

There are many situations in which it is easier to submit a grievance to someone other than the police, even if the behavior rises to the level of criminal.

For example, let's say I am leaving work one night and an angry co-worker approaches me in the parking lot because he is angry because I voiced disagreement about what he said during a meeting and in his rage he punches me in the face and breaks my nose. Beyond the question of whether I retaliate immediately, I have a choice of whether or not I want to press criminal charges and/or whether I want to file a grievance with my employer. Personally I would not really care if the co-worker was charged with a criminal act, but I sure as hell would want him fired or at least suspended from work.

If my employer listened to my report of events and said that they would not do anything and that I needed to go to the police instead, I certainly would not be happy.
 
For example, let's say I am leaving work one night and an angry co-worker approaches me in the parking lot because he is angry because I voiced disagreement about what he said during a meeting and in his rage he punches me in the face and breaks my nose.

The difference of course being that the hypothetical case you described is employer-based, both in the instigation and the perp and the victim. A very employer-involved case.

We do not know (I believe) the relationship between the alleged perps and alleged victim here, but, even if both students, that may or may not be gemaine to the alleged crime.
 
The difference of course being that the hypothetical case you described is employer-based, both in the instigation and the perp and the victim. A very employer-involved case.

We do not know (I believe) the relationship between the alleged perps and alleged victim here, but, even if both students, that may or may not be gemaine to the alleged crime.

You're absolutely right. However, in your first post you said:
  • "I will NEVER understand this, not with this case, not with the Iowa/Satterfield/other guy case, not with any of them: Alleged victim: If you think a crime was committed, go to the police! School officials, including coaches: If the victim/family come to you, tell them to go to the police, and say nothing more."
I assume you simply overstated your argument, because you do seem to recognize that the relationship between the alleged victim and alleged perpetrator could be germane to the grievance and could impact whether the police are involved beyond the school administration.
 
You're absolutely right. However, in your first post you said:
  • "I will NEVER understand this, not with this case, not with the Iowa/Satterfield/other guy case, not with any of them: Alleged victim: If you think a crime was committed, go to the police! School officials, including coaches: If the victim/family come to you, tell them to go to the police, and say nothing more."
I assume you simply overstated your argument, because you do seem to recognize that the relationship between the alleged victim and alleged perpetrator could be germane to the grievance and could impact whether the police are involved beyond the school administration.

I get your point, and, as always, the facts of the particular case matter. It just seems to me that, with the enormous emotions involved in a sexual assault case, and with the "privileged" football players involved, there is no chance that the school/coaches can handle such dynamite to the satisfaction of the alleged victim. I feel it has never once happened.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT