thefederalist.com
How do you think it will end up?Trump Is Right About Birthright Citizenship
Trump isn’t rewriting the 14th Amendment; he’s applying the law as it is, based on its plain language and existing Supreme Court precedent.
Seems some legal scholars gave a different take.
And I was lead to believe that anyone that didn't see this issue as city and dried was stupid.
Smh.
Here’s what I’ve read on this that contradicts this article. The 14th amendment deals solely and absolutely with the child. Not the parents. Arguments about the parents are irrelevant because there is nothing about the parents in the 14th amendment. A child born to diplomats in the US has at birth a diplomatic passport, falling under the 14th. At the time of passage, native Americans were citizens of their tribe and fell under the 14th.Trump Is Right About Birthright Citizenship
Trump isn’t rewriting the 14th Amendment; he’s applying the law as it is, based on its plain language and existing Supreme Court precedent.
Seems some legal scholars gave a different take.
And I was lead to believe that anyone that didn't see this issue as city and dried was stupid.
Smh.
Constitution and legal process of making changes to it be damned eh Harvard? Surprised you admit to that. Go het them libs!!!
The only legal issue is dems abusing the law and manipulating obvious language to fit their political desires. For some reason those desires are very centered around having a serf class to pick crops for them.
"And subject to the jurisdiction thereof"
I hope. Birth right citizenship needs to go away. If not here legally then your kids should not become citizens simply because they were born here while here illegally.
Oh great, somebody wrote an article. Yeah boy sure, that obviously throws out the plain text of the amendment and all the jurisprudence regarding it since it became a part of the constitution. See what your Reagan judge said about Trump's Executive Order this week in an actual court of law.Trump Is Right About Birthright Citizenship
Trump isn’t rewriting the 14th Amendment; he’s applying the law as it is, based on its plain language and existing Supreme Court precedent.
Seems some legal scholars gave a different take.
And I was lead to believe that anyone that didn't see this issue as city and dried was stupid.
Smh.
Trump Is Right About Birthright Citizenship
Trump isn’t rewriting the 14th Amendment; he’s applying the law as it is, based on its plain language and existing Supreme Court precedent.
Seems some legal scholars gave a different take.
And I was lead to believe that anyone that didn't see this issue as city and dried was stupid.
Smh.
But, when this gay couple is deported, who will tend their little anchor babies in America? >
Nice troll job Scruddy. Even you are smart enough to know the judge who just threw out the EO was appointed by Reagan and not a dem. By all means troll away, just remember people who throw shit at the wall usually get it all over them as well.
People like you are beyond hope. Anyone who doesn’t agree with your thinking is a fascist.
Are you saying he's senile, because that would be my guess looking the ruling he made?
Here they come with that F word again when they don't get their way! 🤡
Trump Is Right About Birthright Citizenship
Trump isn’t rewriting the 14th Amendment; he’s applying the law as it is, based on its plain language and existing Supreme Court precedent.
Seems some legal scholars gave a different take.
And I was lead to believe that anyone that didn't see this issue as city and dried was stupid.
Smh.
Well considering the many decades of precedence on this matter I would assume he thinks it was laughable as he indicated in the text of his ruling.
Oh FFS, there isn't any argument on this issue. It's an amendment to the constitution and you can't overturn it by an Executive order or creating arguments out of thin air that have never ever been taken seriously when it comes to this amendment. Only lawless fascists would try to make these types of arguments.
All that precedent is set in a timeframe when America needed/wanted unlimited bodies and was never meant to be a bonus for criminal invaders.
That's not what he said. The xenophobic language and motivations behind the birthright EO is fascist. You saying "No it's not" doesn't change the fact that it is. Maybe instead of just deciding all criticism claiming you are fascist is wrong, you should start looking at why people keep calling you fascist.
Babies born in America are criminal invaders? What crime did the fetus commit to be labeled a criminal? What agency did they have when they committed that crime?
Didn't say the unborn human beings committed any crime. I said they shouldn't receive the bonus of US citizenship due to their criminal parents being criminals. If daddy robs a bank and gets caught but has already given the money to little Johnny, does little Johnny have to give the money back to the bank or does he get to keep it because he didn't commit the crime??
We have an X president who belongs on Gitmo! Why should any heir of any of these people benefit one scintilla from all of this wrongdoing >
Makes so much sense you read the federalist. You really check all the boxes.Trump Is Right About Birthright Citizenship
Trump isn’t rewriting the 14th Amendment; he’s applying the law as it is, based on its plain language and existing Supreme Court precedent.
Seems some legal scholars gave a different take.
And I was lead to believe that anyone that didn't see this issue as city and dried was stupid.
Smh.
Why stop there? Let’s pass all the sins of the parents onto their children. If your dad committed a murder make the kid pay restitution to the victim. If your parent is caught drunk driving make the kids clean up trash on the side of the road.
That makes zero sense and does not parallel my point in anyway. You're just another psycho, paranoid, axe grinding hater of America.
You and PJ are both wrong, as usual. You have no idea of what the motivations are. That is nothing more than your opinion, as wrong and dumb as it is, it’s an opinion. Instead of claiming everyone who doesn’t agree with you is a fascist start looking at why people calling you stupid and a big part of the lefts problem.
You seem to be saying that the constitution has inherent flexibility assumed within the document. That times change and allow for a different interpretation than what was originally intended. Maybe you should school Clarence Thomas as it pertains to the 2nd.
Yup, times change! Dems have allowed crime to run so rampant, the 2A should DEMAND all citizens own a weapon!
You said babies born on US soil to illegals “shouldn't receive the bonus of US citizenship due to their criminal parents being criminals”. You are taking away the constitutionally protected right of citizenship from someone whose parent committed a crime. I then extended that - if we are allowed to take away birthrights given by the constitution simply because of what parents do then by obvious extension we can take away other rights and apply other penalties based on what parents have done.
Somebody Ilhan? That somebody is, from the article, "Matthew Raymer is a former chief counsel at the Republican National Committee and a recent resident fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School’s Institute of Politics."
I love the Federalist you bet. Guilty as charged.
Ok.
www.allsides.com
www.allsides.com
