Idaho case regarding whether EMTALA (requirement to treat people presenting in emergency rooms with emergencies, until medical stabilization is achieved) preempts state law precluding abortions. (Idaho should probably lose as to emergent situations).
Soto seems to have abandoned all pretense of actually asking questions of counsel. Lots of focus otherwise on whether the exceptions in the Idaho law are such that an injunction isn't really needed.
Soto seems to have abandoned all pretense of actually asking questions of counsel. Lots of focus otherwise on whether the exceptions in the Idaho law are such that an injunction isn't really needed.