ADVERTISEMENT

Musk Offers $100 to Wisconsin Voters, Bringing Back a Controversial Tactic

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,937
63,652
113
Elon Musk is bringing back his most controversial gambit from the 2024 presidential election: paying voters as part of a plan to identify and turn out conservative-leaning ones.
The super PAC that Mr. Musk founded to funnel his fortune into Republican causes, America PAC, said on Thursday that it was offering $100 to registered voters in Wisconsin who sign a petition “in opposition to activist judges” or refer others to sign it. Mr. Musk has been using the group to spend millions of dollars to elect a conservative candidate for the Wisconsin Supreme Court in an April 1 election.
The petition reads: “Judges should interpret laws as written, not rewrite them to fit their personal or political agendas. By signing below, I’m rejecting the actions of activist judges who impose their own views and demanding a judiciary that respects its role — interpreting, not legislating.”
The purpose of the petition is multifaceted: Drive attention from the news media, increase awareness and voter registration among conservative voters, and help America PAC collect data on the most energized Wisconsinites who are likely to turn out for the conservative candidate, Brad Schimel.
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


Mr. Musk carried out a nearly identical maneuver in battleground states before the November election, generating significant legal and political debate.
The Philadelphia district attorney sued to stop the distribution of those lottery-style payouts, which went up to $1 million to voters who signed a document in support of the First Amendment. But the day before Election Day, a Pennsylvania judge declined to halt the sweepstakes.
America PAC’s revival of the use of petitions, and the wording of its new document in Wisconsin, reveal two of Mr. Musk’s priorities as he wields wide power in Washington.
The first is his focus on the court election in Wisconsin, which could swing control of the state’s top judicial body back to conservatives after liberals won a major victory there in 2023. Mr. Musk’s super PAC and an allied nonprofit group have spent over $11 million to try to elect Judge Schimel, which would again push the battleground state rightward on issues like redistricting and abortion rights.
Mr. Musk’s electric car company, Tesla, has also sued Wisconsin to challenge a state law prohibiting manufacturers from owning dealerships. In January, eight days after Tesla filed the suit, Mr. Musk wrote on X, “Very important to vote Republican for the Wisconsin Supreme Court to prevent voting fraud.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/20/us/politics/elon-musk-wisconsin-petition.html
 
When a Dem takes in 2029* the first thing they should do is issue an arrest warrant for Musk and seize his assets**.

*Assuming we still have free and fair elections
**Also assuming Musk doesn't flee the country or try to eat a bullet like his idol Adolph did.
Also need to ship him out of country immediately and any judge that tries to stop it just say 'sorry, plane is already out of US territory, can't turn around now'
 
Also, saving those astronauts that the government and Boeing failed. Constantly offering his cars and satellites to people in need. Pssssssh what a self centered, rich dick. His companies literally help no one. Straight to south africa when Dems are back in!

SpaceX wouldn't even exist if it wasn't for a little corporate welfare and technology. The satellites he offered up are paid for via government contracts, and he wanted to pull them and potentially leave Ukraine hanging so a French satellite company stepped in to cut off that eventually. If you think that most of what Elon does in terms of public relations isn't just to suit his goals then I have a bridge to sell you.

I wouldn't send him back to South Africa. He paid a quarter of a billion dollars to get himself his own government agency that seems to really want to kill social safety net programs to feed his greed even more. Sending him to South Africa would be much too nice.
 
SpaceX wouldn't even exist if it wasn't for a little corporate welfare and technology. The satellites he offered up are paid for via government contracts, and he wanted to pull them and potentially leave Ukraine hanging so a French satellite company stepped in to cut off that eventually. If you think that most of what Elon does in terms of public relations isn't just to suit his goals then I have a bridge to sell you.

I wouldn't send him back to South Africa. He paid a quarter of a billion dollars to get himself his own government agency that seems to really want to kill social safety net programs to feed his greed even more. Sending him to South Africa would be much too nice.
Right. Starting up a space station, an internet company, cars that may or may not be solving the biggest issue of all, the boring company, and solutions to people with neurological disorders is so easy... I can't believe I haven't got in on this yet. What he's done, already, to advance human civilization is so awesome a lot of simpletons don't even realize it yet.
 
Last edited:
It's not the participating part. It's paying them to choose a specific side.

Is he doing that though? The article is behind a paywall.

From what I gather, Reps & Dems eligible to sign the petition. No confirmation of voting either for or against is required.

What is stopping Dem billionaires from giving campaign contributions to Dem politicians or pay celebrity spokespeople to be in favor of the proposal?

Don’t they pretty much all do this in one form or another?
 
Hey Bozo. Why do precisely none of the authorities at any level of government agree with you?

18 U.S. Code § 597 - Expenditures to influence voting​

Whoever makes or offers to make an expenditure to any person, either to vote or withhold his vote, or to vote for or against any candidate; and
Whoever solicits, accepts, or receives any such expenditure in consideration of his vote or the withholding of his vote—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if the violation was willful, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 721; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, § 601(a)(12), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3498.)
 

18 U.S. Code § 597 - Expenditures to influence voting​

Whoever makes or offers to make an expenditure to any person, either to vote or withhold his vote, or to vote for or against any candidate; and
Whoever solicits, accepts, or receives any such expenditure in consideration of his vote or the withholding of his vote—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if the violation was willful, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 721; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, § 601(a)(12), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3498.)

So authorities will be issuing charges any minute now right?

Keep us updated!
 
So you're cool with them breaking the law and getting away with it? I expected about as much.
They’re being paid to sign a petition, not to vote a certain way, or not vote.

That’s why you’re not seeing any charges being brought.

If you lived there you could sign the petition and collect his hundred bucks too, regardless of how or if you vote.
 
They’re being paid to sign a petition, not to vote a certain way, or not vote.

That’s why you’re not seeing any charges being brought.

If you lived there you could sign the petition and collect his hundred bucks too, regardless of how or if you vote.
Fair point, but it still is influencing votes through the normal electoral process. It's dirty pool, it shouldn't be allowed.
 
Fair point, but it still is influencing votes through the normal electoral process. It's dirty pool, it shouldn't be allowed.

Raising political awareness isn’t ’dirty pool’, it’s democracy in action.
Most people sit out elections in non-presidential ballots.
If this increases participation, why is that a bad thing?
 
Fair point, but it still is influencing votes through the normal electoral process. It's dirty pool, it shouldn't be allowed.

If a politician speaks out in favor or opposition to a particular candidate, are they influencing votes?

Politicians can do this, but citizens cannot?

I don’t follow your logic here.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BelemNole
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT