So, McCollum also has a couple of basketball-playing teenage sons. Are we going to have another nepotism situation the next couple of years? I don’t think his oldest son is a very highly rated prospect.
God I hope not, but if so I hope it's a McDermott situation and not a McCaffery one.So, McCollum also has a couple of basketball-playing teenage sons. Are we going to have another nepotism situation the next couple of years? I don’t think his oldest son is a very highly rated prospect.
FifyCant be worse than cmac or lil lick
In Mccafferys defense, all of his sons were legitimate D1 prospects. For all the noise, Connor had a solid career and was a great glue guy despite his lack of production. Patrick, on the other hand, probably didn’t belong in Power 5 but probably would have fared better if he wasn’t playing for his dad, and his youngest is literally the #1 prospect in Iowa right now.Like BMac himself, I don't think his boys will be cut-out for B1G basketball. However, if he actually does bring one of his boys on board, my trust in BMac's handling of the situation is light-years ahead of my trust in his predecessors.
Maybe for the football & basketball coaches. But not the lower level non revenue coaches. My brother was a high level D1 coach of a non revenue sport & had his son on his team for a couple of years. Would have needed massive loans if he wouldn't have received a partial scholly. He made much less than $100K per year at a school where tuition was over $50K per year. Wasn't a nepotism situation so much because his kid had to beat our teammates with a better score/time in his events to compete.I'm sure the BF and CM & PM situations are coloring my thoughts on this subject, but ........
The NCAA should have an anti-nepotism rule that prevents children being able to play or coach on/for their parent's team.
Being an NCAA-level coach, the parent can afford to put the kid through college if they aren't talented enough to earn a scholarship at the school of their choice. And let them earn their coaching chops somewhere else besides being pampered and coddled by daddy or mommy.
In Mccafferys defense, all of his sons were legitimate D1 prospects. For all the noise, Connor had a solid career and was a great glue guy despite his lack of production. Patrick, on the other hand, probably didn’t belong in Power 5 but probably would have fared better if he wasn’t playing for his dad, and his youngest is literally the #1 prospect in Iowa right now.
BM strikes me as the kind of guy that would only put his actual kids in positions they could achieve in. Either by not playing for him or in playing minutes they actually earn or deserve. Could be wrong of course but his press conference today really showed me he's all business when it comes to basketball and he's been uber successful as a result.CMAC was about the same level of talent as Kingsbury. Only difference was he had Fran's complete trust. CMAC Basketball career ended as soon as he got out of Iowa---anyone with talent plays overseas, CMAC went directly into coaching.
NO CMAC wouldn't have played the minutes he did if his father wasn't coach. CMAC started over Keegan every game of Keegan's Freshman year. , . There were many,many minutes of both CMAC and PMAC playing together. Fran had a rule regarding his two boys, Always one playing, sometimes both playing together, almost never both on bench---that only occurred in a blowout
Keegan and Kris being on the court together only happended a few minutes total in there careers. When Fran recruited them, he said Keegan would play the 4, and Kris the 3.....that never happened because PMAC was playing the 3. Kris sat on bench Freshman year because if he'd played, he'd of taken PT away from PMAC and CMAC.
Anyway the way to prevent Nepotism is don't put your boys on the team and give them preferential treatment. Fran got fired and partly because he spent a few years maximizing McCaffery Family time instead of doing his job and recruiting/playing the best lineups possible. He had a chance to recruit over CMAC and PMAC and he didn't.
I agree with all of your points except saying CMAC was same talent as Kingsbury. That seems unfair. He did not live up to his hs ranking but was tough as nails, an outstanding passer and turned into an adequate 3 point shooter. I will concede that Kingsbury was never going to get the same opportunity.CMAC was about the same level of talent as Kingsbury. Only difference was he had Fran's complete trust. CMAC Basketball career ended as soon as he got out of Iowa---anyone with talent plays overseas, CMAC went directly into coaching.
NO CMAC wouldn't have played the minutes he did if his father wasn't coach. CMAC started over Keegan every game of Keegan's Freshman year. , . There were many,many minutes of both CMAC and PMAC playing together. Fran had a rule regarding his two boys, Always one playing, sometimes both playing together, almost never both on bench---that only occurred in a blowout
Keegan and Kris being on the court together only happended a few minutes total in there careers. When Fran recruited them, he said Keegan would play the 4, and Kris the 3.....that never happened because PMAC was playing the 3. Kris sat on bench Freshman year because if he'd played, he'd of taken PT away from PMAC and CMAC.
Anyway the way to prevent Nepotism is don't put your boys on the team and give them preferential treatment. Fran got fired and partly because he spent a few years maximizing McCaffery Family time instead of doing his job and recruiting/playing the best lineups possible. He had a chance to recruit over CMAC and PMAC and he didn't.
Ahhh. Opinions masquerading as facts. Heck even Kenyon said otherwise.CMAC was about the same level of talent as Kingsbury. Only difference was he had Fran's complete trust. CMAC Basketball career ended as soon as he got out of Iowa---anyone with talent plays overseas, CMAC went directly into coaching.
NO CMAC wouldn't have played the minutes he did if his father wasn't coach. CMAC started over Keegan every game of Keegan's Freshman year. , . There were many,many minutes of both CMAC and PMAC playing together. Fran had a rule regarding his two boys, Always one playing, sometimes both playing together, almost never both on bench---that only occurred in a blowout
Keegan and Kris being on the court together only happended a few minutes total in there careers. When Fran recruited them, he said Keegan would play the 4, and Kris the 3.....that never happened because PMAC was playing the 3. Kris sat on bench Freshman year because if he'd played, he'd of taken PT away from PMAC and CMAC.
Anyway the way to prevent Nepotism is don't put your boys on the team and give them preferential treatment. Fran got fired and partly because he spent a few years maximizing McCaffery Family time instead of doing his job and recruiting/playing the best lineups possible. He had a chance to recruit over CMAC and PMAC and he didn't.
NFL playersBrian and James ferrntz were very solid players for Iowa.
Mason Woods is a good recruit for Iowa.
This would be #168 on list of issues for NCAA.
Not #169? 😉Brian and James ferrntz were very solid players for Iowa.
Mason Woods is a good recruit for Iowa.
This would be #168 on list of issues for NCAA.
Not sure how Lil Lick was nepotism in the slightestCant be worse than lick jr
Never, Never happen. As I posted one time there were 65 such "nepotism" cases just in P5 football, ad its probably triple that in basketball. It works out fine for some, and not others. frankly Kirks sons were good players, just never should have made Brian OC....I'm sure the BF and CM & PM situations are coloring my thoughts on this subject, but ........
The NCAA should have an anti-nepotism rule that prevents children being able to play or coach on/for their parent's team.
Being an NCAA-level coach, the parent can afford to put the kid through college if they aren't talented enough to earn a scholarship at the school of their choice. And let them earn their coaching chops somewhere else besides being pampered and coddled by daddy or mommy.
What complete garbage!CMAC was about the same level of talent as Kingsbury. Only difference was he had Fran's complete trust. CMAC Basketball career ended as soon as he got out of Iowa---anyone with talent plays overseas, CMAC went directly into coaching.
NO CMAC wouldn't have played the minutes he did if his father wasn't coach. CMAC started over Keegan every game of Keegan's Freshman year. , . There were many,many minutes of both CMAC and PMAC playing together. Fran had a rule regarding his two boys, Always one playing, sometimes both playing together, almost never both on bench---that only occurred in a blowout
Keegan and Kris being on the court together only happended a few minutes total in there careers. When Fran recruited them, he said Keegan would play the 4, and Kris the 3.....that never happened because PMAC was playing the 3. Kris sat on bench Freshman year because if he'd played, he'd of taken PT away from PMAC and CMAC.
Anyway the way to prevent Nepotism is don't put your boys on the team and give them preferential treatment. Fran got fired and partly because he spent a few years maximizing McCaffery Family time instead of doing his job and recruiting/playing the best lineups possible. He had a chance to recruit over CMAC and PMAC and he didn't.
Connor's career was so solid, he played ahead of Kris and Keegan.In Mccafferys defense, all of his sons were legitimate D1 prospects. For all the noise, Connor had a solid career and was a great glue guy despite his lack of production. Patrick, on the other hand, probably didn’t belong in Power 5 but probably would have fared better if he wasn’t playing for his dad, and his youngest is literally the #1 prospect in Iowa right now.
I wouldn’t put CMac in that category. He gave his heart to the Hawkeyes and played hard. So wrong to put him in lil Lick category.Fify
You mean are fans going to be as unhinged over kids playing for their parent?So, McCollum also has a couple of basketball-playing teenage sons. Are we going to have another nepotism situation the next couple of years? I don’t think his oldest son is a very highly rated prospect.
Like BMac himself, I don't think his boys will be cut-out for B1G basketball. However, if he actually does bring one of his boys on board, my trust in BMac's handling of the situation is light-years ahead of my trust in his predecessors.
Lil Lick only played due to injuries iirc. Cmac not only played over better players, he also affected recruiting b/c fran wouldn't recruit his position. He should've been a back of the bench sub at most. There's a reason he didn't have any options to play for pay after college.I wouldn’t put CMac in that category. He gave his heart to the Hawkeyes and played hard. So wrong to put him in lil Lick category.
Anyway the way to prevent Nepotism is don't put your boys on the team and give them preferential treatment.
Yea. But Brian Ferentz was a middle school football level offensive coordinator. Flag football, not tackle.NFL players
Saying CMac turned into an adequate 3 point shooter is like saying saying Brian Ferentz was an adequate offensive coordinator. The guy shot 27%, 33% and 33% from three his last three seasons.I agree with all of your points except saying CMAC was same talent as Kingsbury. That seems unfair. He did not live up to his hs ranking but was tough as nails, an outstanding passer and turned into an adequate 3 point shooter. I will concede that Kingsbury was never going to get the same opportunity.
No one does less thinking than people who use the word “clone” on a regular basis, as in every skinny white forward with some size is an “Aaron White clone” or every Black wing with some shooting ability is a “Peter Jok clone.”comparisons are a short cut to thinking
Conner v Murray x 2 and lack of pt guard. It was huge.In Mccafferys defense, all of his sons were legitimate D1 prospects. For all the noise, Connor had a solid career and was a great glue guy despite his lack of production. Patrick, on the other hand, probably didn’t belong in Power 5 but probably would have fared better if he wasn’t playing for his dad, and his youngest is literally the #1 prospect in Iowa right now.
And he was unguarded.Saying CMac turned into an adequate 3 point shooter is like saying saying Brian Ferentz was an adequate offensive coordinator. The guy shot 27%, 33% and 33% from three his last three seasons.
Some of you guys are unhinged when it comes to the nepotism accusations. It's not as big of an issue as people make it out to be. There are plenty of examples where fanbases benefit from a coach who has an extremely talented son. Even the "bad" examples are very much up for debate.I'm sure the BF and CM & PM situations are coloring my thoughts on this subject, but ........
The NCAA should have an anti-nepotism rule that prevents children being able to play or coach on/for their parent's team.
Being an NCAA-level coach, the parent can afford to put the kid through college if they aren't talented enough to earn a scholarship at the school of their choice. And let them earn their coaching chops somewhere else besides being pampered and coddled by daddy or mommy.
That’s a good point and there a couple people on here that doesn’t register with. They point to Brock Harding and compare his numbers to Bohannon. I’ll just say Harding (and CMac) get a lot more wide open threes than a guy high on the scouting report like Bohannon or Payton Sandfort.And he was unguarded.