Yeah, it would be weird if your foreign neighbor, of unknown height and weight, had too much caffeine and protein, and forgot the rule.They did put you in a situation of not knowing how i before e works
Cut him some slack.
Yeah, it would be weird if your foreign neighbor, of unknown height and weight, had too much caffeine and protein, and forgot the rule.They did put you in a situation of not knowing how i before e works
In terms of the potential for the fans who suffer amputations to sue and be successful, yes, I think anything is possible.I inferred from your post that you believed the lawsuit was frivolous, from your “anything is is possible” because a lady once sued McDonald’s for spilling hot coffee on lap. Was I supposed to interpret that differently?
Frivolous lawsuits became really popular with a cup of super hot coffee.Amputations left and right coming in from Miami - KC game.
Well, chalk it up to inferring something not implied. It is just every other time I have seen someone bring up the McDonald’s case it seems it has been in the context of frivolousness. Case in point is lucious’s post right above this one.In terms of the potential for the fans who suffer amputations to sue and be successful, yes, I think anything is possible.
I don’t understand why you think I am saying it would be a frivolous lawsuit. I think the woman who spilled coffee on herself then sued McDonald’s and won is a relevant paralleling example. McDonald’s knew their coffee was too hot and could cause serious burns just as the NFL knew the game would be played in dangerously cold temperatures that could cause serious health risks for fans (and players) but chose to have the game played anyway. Is that not a logical connection to make in terms of the potential for legal liability on the part of the NFL?
Good call. Because nothing can go wrong in the dead of summer playingRegular season should start in late July.
Football shouldn't be played when it's dead middle.of winter, it degrades the product way too much.
The stadium owners could have foreseen this and installed heated seats for the fans.
I'm sure that would only cost a couple of a million
Yes, heated seats would have prevented frostbite. Once again you are a shining example of critical thinking for us all to learn from.The stadium owners could have foreseen this and installed heated seats for the fans.
I'm sure that would only cost a couple of a million dollars.
Yes, heated seats would have prevented frostbite. Once again you are a shining example of critical thinking for us all to learn from.
If you start it in July, then you're replacing frostbite with heat stoke. The problem is the 17 game schedule that forces them into one weather extreme or the other, depending on the location.Regular season should start in late July.
Football shouldn't be played when it's dead middle.of winter, it degrades the product way too much.
You're right. They can sue. And with contingent fees there may not be any reason they won't.I didn’t say it would be victorious, I said it would be interesting. You are probably right, but there are concepts of premises liability, attractive nuisance, contracts of adhesion, gross negligence, etc. that a creative lawyer could advance.
Apples and oranges.It's as ridiculous as suing the U for racism when the players could have simply gone to another program.
Is everybody pretending this game is happening today or something? The fuk
So don't go. Nobody forced them to be at the game. And the dipshits that were not dressed for the weather? Boo-freakin-hoo.It was -4 with a -27 wind chill.