I have always felt the NFL should come up with something similar to the hockey/soccer shootout.
Who wouldn't enjoy watching a game of 500 to break a tie?
Who wouldn't enjoy watching a game of 500 to break a tie?
That's the equivalent of in the top 10th inning you give up a run and game over sorry your pitcher gave up a run. Play a full quarter or everything else is a farce.
I have always felt the NFL should come up with something similar to the hockey/soccer shootout.
Who wouldn't enjoy watching a game of 500 to break a tie?
I'm no soccer fan, but while exciting, the shootout has to be the dumbest f%$king idea in the history of the planet on how to break a tie. Talk about leaving the outcome of the game up to completely random chance. Goal keepers flat guessing and diving a certain way before the ball is even kicked? What the hell does that have to do with determining which team is better and more deserving of victory?
They should just shoot marbles in the center circle or have a quick game of craps.
'bean...Remember, it is the NFL. "The fix" was in long before the OT. I too think BOTH teams should get a possession but then, who am I? I don't even bet the games.
and casual observers. too. Hellsbells swag...I'm a Browns fan...they are so bad there is no need to put "the fix" in when they are involved.The fix is in - said every fan of losing teams
The ref said it was.....How the eff was that a good catch?
Aaron Rodgers is now 0-7 in OT games. Perhaps McCarthy should have gone for 2 at the end of regulation.
Did he step foot on the field in any of those games?