ADVERTISEMENT

NFL owners approve Raiders' move from Oakland to Las Vegas in 31-1 vote

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,507
62,732
113
NFL owners approved the Oakland Raiders' move to Las Vegas at the league meetings on Monday.

The vote was a foregone conclusion after the league and Raiders were not satisfied with Oakland's proposals for a new stadium, and Las Vegas stepped up with $750 million in public money. Bank of America also is giving Raiders owner Mark Davis a $650 million loan, further helping convince the owners to allow the third team relocation in just over a year.

Owners voted 31-1 to approve the move. The dissenting vote wasn't immediately announced.

The Rams moved from St. Louis to Los Angeles in 2016, and in January the Chargers relocated from San Diego to LA. The Raiders likely will play two or three more years in the Bay Area before their $1.7 billion stadium near the Las Vegas strip is ready.


Las Vegas, long taboo to the NFL because of its legalized gambling, also is getting an NHL team this fall, the Golden Knights.

"Today will forever change the landscape of Las Vegas and UNLV football," said Steve Sisolak, chairman of the Clark County Commission and a former member of a panel appointed by the Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval to study the stadium tax funding plan.


"I couldn't be more excited for the fans and residents of Clark County as we move forward with the Raiders and the Rebels," Sisolak said.

Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf and a group trying to keep the team in Oakland, made a last-ditch presentation to the NFL last week. But that letter was "filled with uncertainty," according to Commissioner Roger Goodell.

Monday, she asked the owners to delay the vote, wanting to give her city a chance to negotiate with a small group of owners to complete a stadium deal at the Coliseum site.

"Never that we know of has the NFL voted to displace a team from its established market when there is a fully financed option before them with all the issues addressed," Mayor Libby Schaaf said in a statement. "I'd be remiss if I didn't do everything in my power to make the case for Oakland up until the very end."

Schaaf said the city has presented a $1.3 billion plan for a stadium at the Coliseum site that would be ready by 2021. She says the existing Coliseum would be demolished by 2024, with the Oakland Athletics baseball team either moving to a new stadium at the Coliseum site or somewhere else in the city.

The Raiders' move became more certain earlier this month when Bank of America offered the loan. That replaced the same amount the Raiders lost when the league balked at having casino owner Sheldon Adelson involved and he was dropped from the team's plans.

Leaving the Bay Area is not something new with the Raiders, who played in Los Angeles from 1982-94 before heading back to Oakland. Davis was passed over last year in an attempt to move to a stadium in the LA area that would have been jointly financed with the Chargers. Instead, the owners approved the Rams' relocation and gave the Chargers an option to join them, which they exercised this winter.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sport...ove-to-las-vegas-approved-20170327-story.html
 
Las Vegas taxpayers pay $750 million of their money
to get the Oakland Raiders. The American taxpayer
is a pushover for these wealthy owners of pro sport
teams. MLB, NFL, NBA will always move teams when
it is convenient for the owners to do so. There is no
loyalty to the fan base of a team, just larceny when it
is time to move to a new city.
 
Because we want home games for our Super Bowl in 8 years and not have to travel to Vegas.
 
Las Vegas taxpayers pay $750 million of their money
to get the Oakland Raiders. The American taxpayer
is a pushover for these wealthy owners of pro sport
teams. MLB, NFL, NBA will always move teams when
it is convenient for the owners to do so. There is no
loyalty to the fan base of a team, just larceny when it
is time to move to a new city.

Packer's ownership model is the way pro-sports teams should go. But that's not likely to happen any time soon.

What's weird to me is where not Raider's games generally well attended?? Even during their crappy years of which they had many their fans showed up.

Now they finally start getting good again and they tell the fans who suffered through all of their losing to take a hike.
 
Packer's ownership model is the way pro-sports teams should go. But that's not likely to happen any time soon.

What's weird to me is where not Raider's games generally well attended?? Even during their crappy years of which they had many their fans showed up.

Now they finally start getting good again and they tell the fans who suffered through all of their losing to take a hike.

A) Oakland (as a city) sucks
B) Oakland sucks
C) Oakland's stadium sucks
D) There are no corporate boxes in said stadium
E) Literally there is crap all over the staidum.
F) Oakland sucks
G) Oakland dragged it heels in trying to get a new stadium
H) The fans in section 331 don't matter
I) Oakland sucks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: millah_22
A) Oakland (as a city) sucks
B) Oakland sucks
C) Oakland's stadium sucks
D) There are no corporate boxes in said stadium
E) Literally there is crap all over the staidum.
F) Oakland sucks
G) Oakland dragged it heels in trying to get a new stadium
H) The fans in section 331 don't matter
I) Oakland sucks.

I'm going to agree on some of these. The town stinks. The stadium does suck. There are however corporate boxes. Yes they had some plumbing issues.
What is the significance of sec.331? My seats were section 131.
 
Las Vegas taxpayers pay $750 million of their money
to get the Oakland Raiders. The American taxpayer
is a pushover for these wealthy owners of pro sport
teams. MLB, NFL, NBA will always move teams when
it is convenient for the owners to do so. There is no
loyalty to the fan base of a team, just larceny when it
is time to move to a new city.

Yep.

And they'll fund it with 'tax exempt municipal bonds', which will likewise subsidize the stadium and the rich investors will pay NO taxes on those bonds.

It is a massive rich-guy subsidy for these leagues and their owners.
 
I'm going to agree on some of these. The town stinks. The stadium does suck. There are however corporate boxes. Yes they had some plumbing issues.
What is the significance of sec.331? My seats were section 131.

I just meant joe blow fans don't matter, in response to Hooiser fan support question, and section 331 was just random. The people that sit in the 200s and 300s that support the team like he's thinking about are gonna be there in any city.
 
NFL owners will all collect 53 million dollars from fees from the Rams, Chargers, and Raiders moving.

Good for Oakland to say no to spending tax payer money they don't have to keep the raiders.
 
The revenue that this will create for the city of Las Vegas will be bigly. LV is an absolute perfect NFL team destination because it has direct flights from everywhere in the country. If Cleveland plays the Raiders in Oakland would a lot of out of town fans show up? No.

Put the game in LV and it becomes an easy flight with great hotel options close to the stadium and an entire vacation weekend. As a life long Raiders fan I would never attend a home game in Oakland or Los Angeles. In LV it is pretty much a sure thing that I will get to a game every couple of years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SF HAWKEYE
The revenue that this will create for the city of Las Vegas will be bigly. LV is an absolute perfect NFL team destination because it has direct flights from everywhere in the country. If Cleveland plays the Raiders in Oakland would a lot of out of town fans show up? No.

Put the game in LV and it becomes an easy flight with great hotel options close to the stadium and an entire vacation weekend. As a life long Raiders fan I would never attend a home game in Oakland or Los Angeles. In LV it is pretty much a sure thing that I will get to a game every couple of years.

Cleveland? Probably not. They can see the Browns lose in person at much cheaper cost.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT