The argument can go both ways. Is it worth it to tie up a bunch of money on 5th year seniors? Would the money be better spent on acquiring and developing young guns and getting 4/5 years out of them?
In a perfect world yes...but we're not doing a good job landing the young guns, so we have to take the 1/2 year guys.The argument can go both ways. Is it worth it to tie up a bunch of money on 5th year seniors? Would the money be better spent on acquiring and developing young guns and getting 4/5 years out of them?
You don't spend that type of $ on HS recruits. You spend that $ on proven AAs as transfers. Most top 10 teams now will have a transfer or 2 a year filling in holes. Most HS recruits don't get the type of $ as transfers do because they've not proved it yet. If you go to Penn st or Iowa and you win you win be compensated nicelyThe argument can go both ways. Is it worth it to tie up a bunch of money on 5th year seniors? Would the money be better spent on acquiring and developing young guns and getting 4/5 years out of them?
Yall should use the money to buy out your head coach.Both are necessary. I’m more concerned about 49/57/97 winning in March than January.