Win and I can see 9-3. Lose and I can see 5-7.
Win and I can see 9-3. Lose and I can see 5-7.
They're going to tell us that we are a good team, and that Fat Pat Fitgerald is still a bitter try hard.Win and I can see 9-3. Lose and I can see 5-7.
Sober up then, tOSU will roll io_a, Purdue wins going away. Io_a will be lucky to win once in November. Better get those 2 against NW and Minnesota.Lose and I see 7-5, maybe 6-6, win and I agree 9-3. Nebraska is not very good and we should be able to beat purdont. Call me crazy but this is the first time in a long time I feel like we really should beat OSU.
Sober up then, tOSU will roll io_a, Purdue wins going away. Io_a will be lucky to win once in November. Better get those 2 against NW and Minnesota.
Ohio State is the only game that is the closest to be a "sure loss." However, as we've seen with ISU beating Oklahoma or Syracuse beating Clemson ... if an underdog executes really well and plays its very best ... the big dog cannot afford to have an off-game.Sober up then, tOSU will roll io_a, Purdue wins going away. Io_a will be lucky to win once in November. Better get those 2 against NW and Minnesota.
Sober up then, tOSU will roll io_a, Purdue wins going away. Io_a will be lucky to win once in November. Better get those 2 against NW and Minnesota.
we could have him line up 25 yds. deep in the slot and throw it to him right away. This would allow him plenty of 'space' to operate. These types of comments keep me coming back.Find a way to get Wadley in open space!
One issue is that Northwestern has really been pretty decent at slowing/stopping the run this season. They held Wisconsin to 109 rushing yards, held Penn State to 95 rushing yards, and held Maryland to 85 rushing yards. Anybody who believes that Iowa will run with much success against Northwestern is grossly mistaken.The biggest thing I'm looking for this weekend is whether we can run the ball. The game against Illinois was the first game in which we averaged over 5 yards per carry, and we have failed to gain 100 yards against the two best teams we've faced this year. Northwestern has a good (not great) run defense, so if we can have success in the running game that should bode well for the rest of the season. If we only average 3.0 yards per carry and struggle to get to 100 total rush yards, then I think that might confirm that this team just isn't going to figure out the running game this year.
The Northwestern game is the closest thing to a true toss up the Hawks have left this year. They are currently about 70%+ favorites against Minnesota, Purdue, and Nebraksa, and large underdogs against OSU and Wisconsin. Win this tossup, and there's a good chance for this season to be memorable. Lose this game, and it's hard to envision anything above mediocrity.
One issue is that Northwestern has really been pretty decent at slowing/stopping the run this season. They held Wisconsin to 109 rushing yards, held Penn State to 95 rushing yards, and held Maryland to 85 rushing yards. Anybody who believes that Iowa will run with much success against Northwestern is grossly mistaken.
An even bigger issue for Iowa will concern how we defend Northwestern. Mobile QBs always seem to eat our D alive. Thorson has grown a lot as a passer ... and that was also a significant reason why they won last year (to go along with the fact that we failed to slow Jackson).
How do you figure that Northwestern's run D is on par with ISU's run D? Again, I pointed out what Northwestern had done against PSU, Wisky, and Maryland ... and those numbers are nothing short of impressive given that each of those teams has a preference to run the ball if they can.Northwestern's running defense is on par with Iowa State's run defense and we managed to put up a respectable performance against their run defense. Northwestern has been good against the run, but not necessarily elite. It will be a good test for this Iowa running game.
One issue is that Northwestern has really been pretty decent at slowing/stopping the run this season. They held Wisconsin to 109 rushing yards, held Penn State to 95 rushing yards, and held Maryland to 85 rushing yards. Anybody who believes that Iowa will run with much success against Northwestern is grossly mistaken.
An even bigger issue for Iowa will concern how we defend Northwestern. Mobile QBs always seem to eat our D alive. Thorson has grown a lot as a passer ... and that was also a significant reason why they won last year (to go along with the fact that we failed to slow Jackson).
ISU is 23rd vs the run so far giving up 119 ypg right behind #22 PSUNorthwestern's running defense is on par with Iowa State's run defense and we managed to put up a respectable performance against their run defense. Northwestern has been good against the run, but not necessarily elite. It will be a good test for this Iowa running game.
I agree - however, it does suggest that for Iowa to be successful, the success will be more predicated upon what we can do through the air.Jus because they held those opponents to a clip way below their average does not mean that Iowa will not be successful.
This a good point. In 2015, NW held McCaffrey to 66 yds. and Stanford to 6 pts. while Wadley ran for 204 and Iowa put 40 on NW. Success can't necessarily be predicated on previous games.Jus because they held those opponents to a clip way below their average does not mean that Iowa will not be successful.
How do you figure that Northwestern's run D is on par with ISU's run D? Again, I pointed out what Northwestern had done against PSU, Wisky, and Maryland ... and those numbers are nothing short of impressive given that each of those teams has a preference to run the ball if they can.
So you really think Iowa drops 4 of their last 6? That’s a lil too much doom and gloom for me.....Unfortunately, it will show this is a 6-6 team. At best.