Why bother. You'll get crickets if you point out Anerica's lax gun laws are a threat to our security.
Libertarian and I most definitely do. I explained why earlier. Who decides the standard of who a possible terrorist threat is? How many shootings occurred by those were considered possible terrorist threats?Show of hands. How many of you repubs on HROT agree with the republican stance on this?
Show of hands. How many of you repubs on HROT agree with the republican stance on this?
Its a simple question to answer, either yes or no.I don't know yet. Tell me how this works.
What other things are we going to be allowed to deny people based on suspicion?
Why wouldn't you just deport a suspected terrorist?
Its a simple question to answer, either yes or no.
Yes it is simple. You are either with us or with the terrorists.It isn't a simple question.
What freedoms should be taken from you due to suspicion?
Libertarian and I most definitely do. I explained why earlier. Who decides the standard of who a possible terrorist threat is?
Yes it is simple. You are either with us or with the terrorists.
It's not a simple answer. On the surface it doesn't look good. But, without knowing the criteria that puts someone on this list, you can't answer it. At least you shouldn't try and answer it without that information.Yes it is simple. You are either with us or with the terrorists.
This law was first introduced in 2007. I wonder why when the Democrats had total control of the government they did not pass this.
This law was first introduced in 2007. I wonder why when the Democrats had total control of the government they did not pass this.
Then you should have reflected that in the thread title.Because many democrats are also shills for the NRA.
Then you should have reflected that in the thread title.
Same here.Libertarian and I most definitely do. I explained why earlier. Who decides the standard of who a possible terrorist threat is? How many shootings occurred by those were considered possible terrorist threats?
You can put whatever you want in the title you don't have to go with political statement of the author.I dont write for the daily news.
We don't already have the ability to stop terrorist from getting guns and explosives using current laws?
These seems pretty strange. The terrorist watch list will stop you from getting on a plane but won't stop you from buying a gun. Looks to be pretty simple and something we already control, just have the FBI deny the purchase.
This law was first introduced in 2007. I wonder why when the Democrats had total control of the government they did not pass this.
That's a REALLY good question.
Perhaps because it hadn't been thought of yet. The Democrats had total control of the government for about six months. They did the best they could, then the Republicans decided that nothing should pass in their attempt to make Obama a one term president.