Put your name on it!
I could see the defense making this a game. But we have such a poor history against them, and they're really hitting their stride now. Unstoppable offense, and disruptive defense. I just don't see it, lads.
an Ohio State University 38
The University of Iowa 13
***
Thanks for the great turnout!
This was certainly the most off game since Iowa State. That game actually turned out a little worse, with an average score of 56.41. Saturday's average score was 51.35.
Parker D should have gone with his first answer, he would have won. Since his final answer was 38-3 OSU, instead the winner is . . .
@larrygreenwallswildride ! Despite predicting the Hawks to lose by 29, yes he's the closest. The penalty for the wrong team is 10 points. He was 2 points off the final margin and 24 points off the total for a winning score of 36. There was a four-way tie for second with 38 points.
Given this, I'll probably change the formula for next season. Getting the winner right needs to weigh more heavily in the scales. I pulled 10 out of thin air, not really knowing how the margin and total points would average out. If I set the penalty to 20 instead, it actually wouldn't have changed the top of the table. This will warrant some thought.
I could see the defense making this a game. But we have such a poor history against them, and they're really hitting their stride now. Unstoppable offense, and disruptive defense. I just don't see it, lads.
an Ohio State University 38
The University of Iowa 13
***
Thanks for the great turnout!
This was certainly the most off game since Iowa State. That game actually turned out a little worse, with an average score of 56.41. Saturday's average score was 51.35.
Parker D should have gone with his first answer, he would have won. Since his final answer was 38-3 OSU, instead the winner is . . .
@larrygreenwallswildride ! Despite predicting the Hawks to lose by 29, yes he's the closest. The penalty for the wrong team is 10 points. He was 2 points off the final margin and 24 points off the total for a winning score of 36. There was a four-way tie for second with 38 points.
Given this, I'll probably change the formula for next season. Getting the winner right needs to weigh more heavily in the scales. I pulled 10 out of thin air, not really knowing how the margin and total points would average out. If I set the penalty to 20 instead, it actually wouldn't have changed the top of the table. This will warrant some thought.
Last edited: