Edited to add various other RPI's
Link- NCAA RPI click here
Link - KPI
Link - Diamond Sport Ranking
Link - Warren Nolan
Link- NCAA RPI click here
Link - KPI
Link - Diamond Sport Ranking
Link - Warren Nolan
Last edited:
Yeah, I saw that date so not sure when the NCAA updates their RPI.I haven’t 100% extricated sports message boards from my day-to-day existence but awfully close.
Just wanted to point out that your link shows RPI as of 3/26. If Warren Nolan is tracking accurately, Iowa moved to #98 after completing the sweep yesterday. Each of the 3 wins was worth about 70-72 RPI points.
The Hawks aren’t getting much RPI help from previous opponents.
The Hawks aren’t getting much RPI help from previous opponents.
Primarily Ohio State beating Oregon, which makes it a wash in the end.They got help today … jumped from 98 to 88.
I get that HawkeyeBacon is basically a shithole, but you're always welcome to post here on the baseball threads. You and @GolfHacker1 are a really good source of information and I think I can speak for all of in saying "Thanks!"I haven’t 100% extricated sports message boards from my day-to-day existence but awfully close.
Just wanted to point out that your link shows RPI as of 3/26. If Warren Nolan is tracking accurately, Iowa moved to #98 after completing the sweep yesterday. Each of the 3 wins was worth about 70-72 RPI points.
The Hawks aren’t getting much RPI help from previous opponents.
Primarily Ohio State beating Oregon, which makes it a wash in the end.
I may be misunderstanding your meaning of “tracking,” but I think he’s suggesting since Iowa plays a 3 game series against Oregon later this year; eventually the win by OSU will offset the RPI bump by Iowa playing Oregon. Making it a “wash in the end.”Not sure I’m “tracking” your point.
OSU pulled off a sweep today. Not only RPI help but Iowa has a 2 game lead on Oregon now in B1G race. I see that as win/win.
I may be misunderstanding your meaning of “tracking,” but I think he’s suggesting since Iowa plays a 3 game series against Oregon later this year; eventually the win by OSU will offset the RPI bump by Iowa playing Oregon. Making it a “wash in the end.”
RPI updated 3/31. Iowa up to 77.
I wholeheartedly believe that Iowa has given itself a chance to enter the at-large discussion and, to a large extent, controls its destiny.
And, seriously, even the most die hard Iowa baseball fans would have been hard pressed to opine that we'd be discussing potential at-large bids on 4/2/25.
Do you have a link to the discussion?Apparently D1Baseball also feels that Iowa should be in the at-large discussion. Damn.
Do you have a link to the discussion?
The more the merrier!FWIW … in ‘24, in addition to RPI, the tournament selection committee reportedly considered KPI rankings/ratings (developed by Ken Pauga) as a factor in choosing teams.
That index can be found here: https://faktorsports.com/
Iowa is currently #55 in KPI.
For ‘25, the committee will supposedly also consider Diamond Sports Ranking as an additional factor. D1 Baseball is involved with these ratings.
The DSR can be found here: https://d1baseball.com/diamond-sports-ranking/
Iowa is currently #70 in DSR.
Offered without further comment.
All we can do is hope the teams we play beat the teams we don’t. Just win a lot of games. And specifically 3 or 4 of them in May.Michigan State / Bowling Green game that was cancellation yesterday would have had an impact on Iowa's RPI depending on the outcome. Indirectly impacts all B1G teams. Not sure if that's rescheduled.
We're at the point in the season that not only does Iowa need to take care of business, but we can start to watch our opponents results for the purpose of RPI and post season chances.
NCAA RPI updated 4/3. Will NCAA update their RPI more often now that the season is in full swing?Went down a rabbit hole yesterday over the lunch hour . . . from what I can tell, the NCAA version of RPI and Warren Nolan's version of RPI appear to be identical.
D1Baseball's RPI is not the same: https://d1baseball.com/nitty-gritty/
The D1Baseball RPI formula currently places Iowa at #82.
As for Nolan’s site and today’s game …
Iowa win = 50 RPI points
Iowa loss = (-37) RPI points
NCAA RPI updated 4/3. Will NCAA update their RPI more often now that the season is in full swing?
I've updated the OP to include your links and Warren Nolan.Not sure about NCAA but Nolan updates in real time . . . Iowa jumps to #70 with today's shellacking of the 'Cats. Obermueller delivers a masterpiece. Didn't need the bullpen at all.
Let's see how the other impact games play out.
Fantastic. Yesterday's win generated some solid gains in all of those metrics. Big game today with the 'Cats saving their best arms to throw this afternoon. Need Savery to bring his A game and the bats to remain hot.I've updated the OP to include your links and Warren Nolan.
Godammit. Here we go with the RPI crap again.....Tough L yesterday. As for RPI, the L dropped Iowa to exactly where they started the week.
The non D1 are simply counted as exhibition and wouldn’t hurt you if you lost either. Only D1 opponents are considered. But generally speaking we are on an island in terms of simply not having any quality opponents for midweek.Godammit. Here we go with the RPI crap again.....
I see 11-17 Minnesota is ahead of Iowa in the RPI. Also, does playing Non- D1 schools hurt?
Ya know, you're BS explanation only resonates with @AuroraHawk and @GolfHacker1The non D1 are simply counted as exhibition and wouldn’t hurt you if you lost either. Only D1 opponents are considered. But generally speaking we are on an island in terms of simply not having any quality opponents for midweek.
Minnesota was able to schedule a ton of ranked teams early on and has the #3 SOS in the country. Their numbers will drop a lot even within the next week. There’s still a lot of nonsensical teams immediately above us and real time RPI just doesn’t get all that accurate until May.
Gotdam RPI....I just look at where Iowa is at. I have a bit of understanding from Warren Nolan’s website. If you click on Iowa there is a way to see what impact Iowa games have, and what impact Iowa’s opponents games have.
Outside of that I don’t understand it.
@AuroraHawk also posted a couple of other sites where the scores impact possible post season opportunities.
We either get an at large via RPI and the other factors, or we have enough wins and a really good B1G Tournament (maybe even have to win it depending on what transpires the rest of the season). That’s what it boils down to.
Appreciate this, we have a good dedicated group educating us here! I do go down that dreaded RPI rabbit hole myself usually in May when Iowa is fluctuating between 50-75 RPI. WarrenNolan is a good site but can drag you into some interesting analytic nightmares as games are played and common opponents are squaring off. Simply put, just keep stacking series victories and do some damage in Big Ten tournament, hard to keep a team out with 30+ wins.+18 RPI points with win today
-59 RPI points with loss today
Get those bats going again and pitchers need to throw strikes. Good gloves all over the field on D.
Had a lunch time meeting cancel today. In light of @Alum-Ni 's post quoting D1 Baseball as thinking the B1G, for now, has a RPI problem but they expect 4 teams to be invited to the dance, I intend to jump into Warren Nolan's site to look at Conference RPI and where all teams are trending.
@BeepBeepInMyJeep 's post is well-reasoned. The SOS for the Hawks is back-loaded this year. Plenty of opportunity for "statement" games or "statement" series.
Is there really that big of a difference for home/away, that RPI needs to have games extremely weighted for baseball?+22 RPI points with a win
(-71) RPI points with a loss
By comparison, Nebraska is:
+64 RPI points with a win
(-16) RPI points with a loss
As currently structured, Iowa (RPI 80) won’t catch Nebraska (RPI 75) in the RPI standings unless they sweep the series.
Welcome to RPI home/away weighting of games.