All that needs to be done to demonstrate how idiotic KF is on this is to have Scruddy as his defender.
Dumb and Dumber in action.
Dumb and Dumber in action.
One big step towards dictatorship
- Thread starter Bulldogs1974
- Start date
And yet, here you are losing to us... for everyone to see. I notice none of the other liberal ninnies on here are coming to save you from drowning.
Because there's no need.
It's hilarious that you are clinging to Scruddy. Peas in a pod.
Says the guy wrong on multiple issues lol
That's a weird way to tell me you don't have a link as I suggested. You just keep losing, comrade.
Don't worry, I'm sure the intellectuals like Tom parris and huey gay will come in soon to validate your losing opinions 😂
Your point was that you don't have a link? Yeah, I did catch that actually.
Still no link to assault weapons in the 2A. You're welcome again.
Was that Adam Schiff or was he the other guy like lied through his teeth?
Speaking of anchors — Arnold Palmer's dick was so large that it could stop a boat from drifting.
None of that is relevant to the point in question. Again, try reading the opinion if you're capable. I understand your preferred policy outcome, and with this activist, revisionist Court, you have a good chance of seeing it happen. But don't pretend with your Google law degree that this hasn't been one of the most settled points of constitutional law for well over a century.
The Democratic party are a bunch of losers that can't read the room right now.
Trump is turning this thing into a dictatorship.
both sides suck... bad. But one is worse.
Yeah well the debate wasn't about illegals coming here and popping anchor babies... that was pretty much excluded early on by the authors of the 14th amendment. This was about black people post-slavery being entitled to citizenship and their kids being citizens.
None of that is relevant to the point in question. Again, try reading the opinion if you're capable. I understand your preferred policy outcome, and with this activist, revisionist Court, you have a good chance of seeing it happen. But don't pretend with your Google law degree that this hasn't been one of the most settled points of constitutional law for well over a century.
Read the opinion, counselor. I regularly litigate constitutional claims, and my understanding goes deeper than the wikipedia introduction to the Citizenship Clause. Unless you want to claim that the SCOTUS decision was invalid, which I have little doubt you do, the arguments you're attempting to parrot were rejected 127 years ago. No worries though, the current Court will be along shortly to overturn longstanding precedent with a half-assed historical "analysis" posing as originalism.
Hans, have you considered once the barriers of decency and normalcy are removed, your side may not be in the preferred party.
I expect this President Rasputin cluster fcvk will backfire, causing serious problems for the Pussy Party.
If you regularly litigate constitutional claims, shouldn't you know what the Constitution says? You can't suck at this that bad... or can you?
The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means. That phrase is ambiguous and you know it. The Court decided 127 years ago that you are wrong. You're out of your depth here.
That guy speaking to MAGA in a vid in another thread calling them stupid m effers…he was speaking directly to you. You dumbasses did this. You handed democracy over to a dictator.
I've already reported you as a worthy addition to the camps, comrade. Kash has you on the naughty list. Prepare yourself accordingly.
No one lies like you maganazis, so you might as well give up on the whataboutism bullshit and admit that you hate our democratic republic and would rather live in a totalitarian state.
Read the opinion and show me precisely where I am incorrect. I'll happily acknowledge it if you're capable of formulating a coherent argument.
Thanks for making my point. One party is mostly trying to save the nation. The other is on the brink of destroying it. The world leader who HATES US, has orchestrated this entire thing and our idiot populace gave it to him. Both sides. Eff that noise.
Dems tried to save the nation with historic inflation, illegal immigration and unprecedented fascistic lawfare? You actually belong in the camps lol
you have an opinion; I have the constitution. I win.
nothing says you're informed about constitutional law like asking why anyone would need to interpret anything in constitution
I don't have an opinion; the Supreme Court of the United States did. The Constitution enshrines the principle of judicial review. But you saw a few posts on right wing Twitter and now know more than SCOTUS and every court to consider the issue since. You're not good at this.
You can't even supply a link to the nonsensical claims you make lol
When you typed "read the opinion" you're saying that's not YOUR opinion but someone else's 100+ year old opinion? I don't recall voting for a single Supreme Court Justice, but I do know we have a government deriving it's just power from the consent of the governed. The Supreme Court can have all the opinions they want, but like Anthony Fauci or Elon Musk, they are not elected leaders and have only the power we give them.
Glad to know I can disregard any interpretation of the Constitution by the Supreme Court that I disagree with. That will come in handy these days. There's no way you're actually this stupid. I'm done trying to reason with you. Consider going outside for a bit.
The Citizenship Clause broadly defines citizenship, superseding the Supreme Court's decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), which had held that Americans descended from African slaves could not be U.S. citizens.
Glad to know I can disregard any interpretation of the Constitution by the Supreme Court that I disagree with. That will come in handy these days. There's no way you're actually this stupid. I'm done trying to reason with you. Consider going outside for a bit.
But The Supreme Court had an opinion in 1857 why isn't that the law today????
