According to another site. Average attendance hovered around 67,000 the past two years. Well that's no fun.
I believe the article in the DMR this morning actually stated that it was 64% of the season ticket holders who had responded to an e-mail sent by the athletic office.Originally posted by Aegon_Targaryen:
According to another site. Average attendance hovered around 67,000 the past two years. Well that's no fun.
Originally posted by IaHawks03:
Keep in mind, this survey was sent out just moments after Iowa got beat by either Nebraska or the bowl game..
Fans were pissed and likely just said they weren't renewing.
I fully expect a decline in season tickets, but it's not going to drop by 30-40%.
This post was edited on 2/16 1:41 PM by IaHawks03
...and they're so damned proud!!Originally posted by Walleye70:
And yet ISU has been selling more than several years ago
Truth is though, is that I'm usually looking for just that when I go. I care if they win, but I'm not all unhinged if they do. I just like how much more fun it is when they are winning. I'm all about the party really, it's not like I'm the one playing of the field. Those are the guys who winning ultimately really matters to.Originally posted by Slappy Pappy:
ISu fans don't expect to win. They're just looking for a nice day out.
I'm not sure it's that bad is it? I got 4 tickets last year for less than $70 or something like that. I used StubHub and got them last minute, but still. From there, we just brought up our food, which we all put in on, split the costs of gas and the parking spot, and that was it. $100 for me and 4 more to enjoy the fun? Works for me.Originally posted by Vroom_C14:
Dropped my 4 tickets - I let them know my frustration with the product on the field, the price of concessions and that an "average" family can no longer afford to go to events. As most stadiums across the country are now experiencing, less attendance due to rising cost of a non-professional sport.
It costs less to go to a Kernels, Titans, Rough Riders game which are semi-pro and usually more entertaining.
Season tickets were a bit more than that... if we go from now on, it will be through stubhub or scalped due to cost. Can't exactly split the cost among my kids... so that doesn't fall into the equation. We did tailgate pre and post so that helps with the food, but if we get there late (due to work) it's easily 100.00 in food on top of parking (10-20 per trip) on top of...Originally posted by Aegon_Targaryen:
I'm not sure it's that bad is it? I got 4 tickets last year for less than $70 or something like that. I used StubHub and got them last minute, but still. From there, we just brought up our food, which we all put in on, split the costs of gas and the parking spot, and that was it. $100 for me and 4 more to enjoy the fun? Works for me.Originally posted by Vroom_C14:
Dropped my 4 tickets - I let them know my frustration with the product on the field, the price of concessions and that an "average" family can no longer afford to go to events. As most stadiums across the country are now experiencing, less attendance due to rising cost of a non-professional sport.
It costs less to go to a Kernels, Titans, Rough Riders game which are semi-pro and usually more entertaining.
The article also said the national average was 72% considering season tickets and 47% considering not getting season tickets. That's 119% mulling it over.Originally posted by TankHawk:
I believe the article in the DMR this morning actually stated that it was 64% of the season ticket holders who had responded to an e-mail sent by the athletic office.Originally posted by Aegon_Targaryen:
According to another site. Average attendance hovered around 67,000 the past two years. Well that's no fun.
I know that I responded because I felt it was an opportunity to voice my frustration about the value I feel I am getting for what I am paying. I suspect that people who are perfectly happy did not bother to respond.
Must be the ones living in the seven extra states Obama campaigned in.Originally posted by Titanhawk2:
The article also said the national average was 72% considering season tickets and 47% considering not getting season tickets. That's 119% mulling it over.Originally posted by TankHawk:
I believe the article in the DMR this morning actually stated that it was 64% of the season ticket holders who had responded to an e-mail sent by the athletic office.Originally posted by Aegon_Targaryen:
According to another site. Average attendance hovered around 67,000 the past two years. Well that's no fun.
I know that I responded because I felt it was an opportunity to voice my frustration about the value I feel I am getting for what I am paying. I suspect that people who are perfectly happy did not bother to respond.
The product on the field is under control of KF who is the "Head Coach". The product on the field hasn't been too appetizing to most as of late. There is a general consensus that watching Iowa football isn't nearly as fun as it used to be. There have been many on here who have stated as such.Originally posted by Hawkeye2222:
the chicken littles want you to believe its KF fault that ticket sales are down and ignore the fact Ticket sales are down all across the country,
as for Harbaugh Michigan is still cutting the student Ticket price in spite of his hire.
This confuses me. Are you trying to imply that going to any one of those lightly-attended events should cost more than an Iowa game?Originally posted by Vroom_C14:
It costs less to go to a Kernels, Titans, Rough Riders game which are semi-pro and usually more entertaining.
Most of the Rough Rider games are sold out - the product on the ice IS more entertaining to watch then the past few years of Iowa (yawn) football. "Lightly-attended" depends on the time of the game for the Kernel's, yes the daytime games are lightly attended - the evening\weekend games have numbers.Originally posted by theIowaHawk:
This confuses me. Are you trying to imply that going to any one of those lightly-attended events should cost more than an Iowa game?Originally posted by Vroom_C14:
It costs less to go to a Kernels, Titans, Rough Riders game which are semi-pro and usually more entertaining.
Really? But, I guess if you are going to claim that those games are more entertaining, I should just ignore your post entirely.
12. Take a serious look into getting new uniforms. The programs needs to refresh and that is a good place to start.Originally posted by Urohawk:
There are several things to turn college football around and several things specific to IA.
1. Start selling beer. It makes a profit, you can control sales, and somehow the rest of humanity manages to consume alcohol at sporting events and the apocalypse doesn't happen. You can decide to stop selling to a drunk at the stadium where he can just continue to drink at the tailgate. I think it would actually be better than what we have now.
2. Put in some wifi. Actually use your electronics to update games on the big screen. I can't even check scores on ESPN.
3. Put in some decent food. Every been to a pro park. You can get BBQ, Mexican, hot dogs, burgers, chicken, etc.
4. Do some new crap with the marching band. My kids don't know "hey jude" or want to listen to more thriller.
5. Close down the RV lot next to Kinnick (or at least half of it) and build a food court and activity center. That is where you should have put the IA sports hall of fame. Move those big donors somewhere else and provide a campus police escorted shuttle buses so they can feel special.
6. Fix the ridiculous per seat donation prices. They're great when you're 10-2 and top 8 three years in a row. Not so much now.
7. Develop a real kids area. Not that crap excuse at the south side. When I take my kids to a Sporting Game in KC, they can play soccer with other kids, kick toward goalies, meet army recruiters and sit in jeeps, visit with the fire dept. There is a multitude of stuff to do.
8. Find a way to advertise during games on TV without interrupting games live. It should be at the edge of the screen kind of like web based adds. Stop interrupting the game. I paid a premium ticket to sit at the event. I also own cable so I am paying for the TV rights. Don't hose me twice buy screwing up the live experience that I paid for.
9. Stop advertising in the stadium. I don't care about the Case IH redzone. Save that stuff for radio and TV.
10. Stop scheduling meaningless patsies in the preseason.
11.....Oh and winning helps.!
Some good points. I think with sale of beer like with Minnesota some state issues/laws go into that but not for sure the loopholes for being able to do that. As for the big donor stuff/RVs since they bring in the $ I don't forsee them doing anything to move or anything else, $ talks.Originally posted by Aegon_Targaryen:
12. Take a serious look into getting new uniforms. The programs needs to refresh and that is a good place to start.Originally posted by Urohawk:
There are several things to turn college football around and several things specific to IA.
1. Start selling beer. It makes a profit, you can control sales, and somehow the rest of humanity manages to consume alcohol at sporting events and the apocalypse doesn't happen. You can decide to stop selling to a drunk at the stadium where he can just continue to drink at the tailgate. I think it would actually be better than what we have now.
2. Put in some wifi. Actually use your electronics to update games on the big screen. I can't even check scores on ESPN.
3. Put in some decent food. Every been to a pro park. You can get BBQ, Mexican, hot dogs, burgers, chicken, etc.
4. Do some new crap with the marching band. My kids don't know "hey jude" or want to listen to more thriller.
5. Close down the RV lot next to Kinnick (or at least half of it) and build a food court and activity center. That is where you should have put the IA sports hall of fame. Move those big donors somewhere else and provide a campus police escorted shuttle buses so they can feel special.
6. Fix the ridiculous per seat donation prices. They're great when you're 10-2 and top 8 three years in a row. Not so much now.
7. Develop a real kids area. Not that crap excuse at the south side. When I take my kids to a Sporting Game in KC, they can play soccer with other kids, kick toward goalies, meet army recruiters and sit in jeeps, visit with the fire dept. There is a multitude of stuff to do.
8. Find a way to advertise during games on TV without interrupting games live. It should be at the edge of the screen kind of like web based adds. Stop interrupting the game. I paid a premium ticket to sit at the event. I also own cable so I am paying for the TV rights. Don't hose me twice buy screwing up the live experience that I paid for.
9. Stop advertising in the stadium. I don't care about the Case IH redzone. Save that stuff for radio and TV.
10. Stop scheduling meaningless patsies in the preseason.
11.....Oh and winning helps.!
13. Change the entrance around, it was cool 10 years ago, it comes off as old and stale now.
14. Add some sort of unique fireworks display, triggered when they score. Lots of other stadiums do it, and it makes a difference. I think we have something going in that regard, but I'd like to see something with a bit more razzle dazzle.
15. Get a new announcer, with a better voice and more personality.
Some good points are made here. I am specifically leaving out the additional points another poster added, as I don't think they are good.Originally posted by Urohawk:
There are several things to turn college football around and several things specific to IA.
1. Start selling beer. It makes a profit, you can control sales, and somehow the rest of humanity manages to consume alcohol at sporting events and the apocalypse doesn't happen. You can decide to stop selling to a drunk at the stadium where he can just continue to drink at the tailgate. I think it would actually be better than what we have now.
2. Put in some wifi. Actually use your electronics to update games on the big screen. I can't even check scores on ESPN.
3. Put in some decent food. Every been to a pro park. You can get BBQ, Mexican, hot dogs, burgers, chicken, etc.
4. Do some new crap with the marching band. My kids don't know "hey jude" or want to listen to more thriller.
5. Close down the RV lot next to Kinnick (or at least half of it) and build a food court and activity center. That is where you should have put the IA sports hall of fame. Move those big donors somewhere else and provide a campus police escorted shuttle buses so they can feel special.
6. Fix the ridiculous per seat donation prices. They're great when you're 10-2 and top 8 three years in a row. Not so much now.
7. Develop a real kids area. Not that crap excuse at the south side. When I take my kids to a Sporting Game in KC, they can play soccer with other kids, kick toward goalies, meet army recruiters and sit in jeeps, visit with the fire dept. There is a multitude of stuff to do.
8. Find a way to advertise during games on TV without interrupting games live. It should be at the edge of the screen kind of like web based adds. Stop interrupting the game. I paid a premium ticket to sit at the event. I also own cable so I am paying for the TV rights. Don't hose me twice buy screwing up the live experience that I paid for.
9. Stop advertising in the stadium. I don't care about the Case IH redzone. Save that stuff for radio and TV.
10. Stop scheduling meaningless patsies in the preseason.
11.....Oh and winning helps.!
Not necessarily disagreeing with this, but I think it ignores one important thing: We don't know if we have lost the "younger fans", we do know we have lost the current students. But students leave and new ones take their place. This batch of students has suffered lean years, The outgoing seniors (iirc) started with a 7-6 and then wallowed in a 4-win and have disappeared since. A new group is coming in, hopefully with renewed excitement of their own, and a strong season from Iowa could bring them back altogether.Originally posted by Arbor1:
The slow attendance decline has begun among the general population preceded by abandonment by the students. VERY difficult to get younger fans back after disengagement.
Well, the titans were 20-8 the past two seasons (two of the losses came in the United Conference Championship - when was Iowa last in the conf championship?...). If you haven't been to a Titan game then you need to go, there are ex-college players (some hawks) that are playing to get to the pros as well, so yep it's entertaining. If you think sitting in Kinnick and watching Iowa barely beat D1AA and MAC schools or losing leads to inferior teams is entertaining, so be it - enjoy.Originally posted by theIowaHawk:
Oh brother. Feel free to continue with your "Titans football is more exciting than Iowa football" garbage. Clearly you need it to wake up in the morning.
I'm pleased to hear that the RoughRiders are selling out, good for them, at 2,584 per game. They should play in Kinnick, I'll bet they'd hit 70k easily.
Lordy, the lengths people will go to convince themselves of things. You can be upset about Iowa football without pretending that Titans games are more exciting.Originally posted by Vroom_C14:
Well, the titans were 20-8 the past two seasons (two of the losses came in the United Conference Championship - when was Iowa last in the conf championship?...). If you haven't been to a Titan game then you need to go, there are ex-college players (some hawks) that are playing to get to the pros as well, so yep it's entertaining. If you think sitting in Kinnick and watching Iowa barely beat D1AA and MAC schools or losing leads to inferior teams is entertaining, so be it - enjoy.Originally posted by theIowaHawk:
Oh brother. Feel free to continue with your "Titans football is more exciting than Iowa football" garbage. Clearly you need it to wake up in the morning.
I'm pleased to hear that the RoughRiders are selling out, good for them, at 2,584 per game. They should play in Kinnick, I'll bet they'd hit 70k easily.
You apparently go to great lengths yourself if you are trying to convince anyone that what Iowa has done the past 3-4 years is "exciting". If what I mentioned above is your idea of "exciting" then enjoy it. It isn't to me.Originally posted by theIowaHawk:
Lordy, the lengths people will go to convince themselves of things. You can be upset about Iowa football without pretending that Titans games are more exciting.Originally posted by Vroom_C14:
Well, the titans were 20-8 the past two seasons (two of the losses came in the United Conference Championship - when was Iowa last in the conf championship?...). If you haven't been to a Titan game then you need to go, there are ex-college players (some hawks) that are playing to get to the pros as well, so yep it's entertaining. If you think sitting in Kinnick and watching Iowa barely beat D1AA and MAC schools or losing leads to inferior teams is entertaining, so be it - enjoy.Originally posted by theIowaHawk:
Oh brother. Feel free to continue with your "Titans football is more exciting than Iowa football" garbage. Clearly you need it to wake up in the morning.
I'm pleased to hear that the RoughRiders are selling out, good for them, at 2,584 per game. They should play in Kinnick, I'll bet they'd hit 70k easily.
Maybe you missed my earlier question: Why don't they play at Kinnick? They'd sell out, right?
I responded in bold. For the most part I agree with most of your points.....just conversing (not arguing).Originally posted by theIowaHawk:
Some good points are made here. I am specifically leaving out the additional points another poster added, as I don't think they are good.
Specific criticisms:
1. I really have no preference on the sale of beer, at least with the idea of beer sales itself. I drink without it, won't change my habit, certainly would for some people I often attend with. Kinnick isn't real conducive towards more concessions/more people at the concessions, but I'm sure it could work.
I use myself as an example. I drive from KC or stay with family the night before so I don't get to games early to tailgate very much or for very long. I am probably an anomaly. I would like to have a beer with my hotdog. I have never seen many issues with drinking at pro venues. I think there is some B10 or NCAA restriction. It is controlled and regulated therefore probably safer.
2. I must not have enough experience with the "wifi" use at big events, do people actually "login" to use this? Not asking if that is how it is done, but whether people actually take the time to do so. I guess if this just means improved signal/reliability among carriers, of course, no brainer.
Most cell phone carriers don't work with that many people overloading the system. With wifi you can at least use instagram, twitter, facebook, etc. Not really my cup of tea but bigger for younger people (I'm 38). I will tell you it is annoying not to have score updates which is why I want it. They can't seem to get the big screen to even give B10 scores at a reliable time.
3. I really don't think the food matters that much. Sure, could improve the quality of what is currently provided (not a fan of the new hot dogs), but having, say, bbq nachos like at Kauffman simply won't work and I wouldn't want it to. The seats are crowded, by necessity, there is hardly room for eating the minimal nachos they offer now. We've "gotten by" without this for a very long time, and IF the team wins, I think everyone agrees it won't be needed to pull people in (unlike a small market baseball team for example).
True on food drawing crowds, but is a nice perk. If you ever been to the bighouse, a lot of stuff is outside the stadium because they have packed the stadium so damn full.
5. Activity Center/Kids area: I am ambivalent about an "activity center" both in that it won't improve anything and I don't think that many will take advantage. How many go to the "tailgate" on the baseball practice field? As for kids, I don't think the answer to lowered attendance is to make it more "family friendly" and "kid conducive". I've long held (and I have children), that Iowa football is not a place for young children. Sure, I get the idea of indoctrinating the young, but that will occur anyway...presuming those parents are attending the games. Simply put, we do not need more young children at these games, especially not as an offset to adults.
I have brought my 6 and 8 year old. They really have a lot of fun. They wouldn't go to every game but I usually bring them to 1 or 2. I don't know why you don't think they should go (yes, I leave the 3 yo at home). I buy a seat for them so the U doesn't care as they are paid money. They don't get drunk (nor am I going to) so safety and crowd control is easier. They become fans of Iowa which they probably wouldn't living here in KC (KU or KSU is easier to cheer for because of friends). To use Kaufman as an example, they have mini golf, a turf kids baseball diamonds, pitching machines, playgrounds etc. If IA slips they may have the same issues a mediocre small market baseball team has.
6. I never get the complaints about the "donation". This isn't difficult: It is the price of the ticket. In fact you should be happy it is a donation, because at least you get to write off some of it, where you wouldn't with a price hike. It also makes it easier to say what the "season ticket price" is across the board.
Maybe you are saying lower the ticket prices, fine, I can understand that. But getting rid of the "donation" isn't going to do that, because it is part of the ticket price. You want to get rid of the donation, the ticket prices will go up to compensate.
You're 100% right. I just don't like the idea of paying extra for
better seats. I think the guy who has tickets for 30 years should get
the 50 yd line tickets.
8./9. Advertising: I am mostly on board with this, but that money is obviously necessary (at least in the department's mind). We've long gone past this sort of complaint, in my opinion. Yes, I pay for "cable" and it still comes with commercials, it is sht and counterintuitive, but it is now the standard practice. Much like the donation complaint above, if you take away Case IH, the money needs to be compensated somewhere else (see: us). They could certainly improve the timing, the quality, and the nature of the advertising. I don't have a problem with the Case IH Redzone, it is a quick comment once they get there, but some of the other ones get annoying. This could certainly be an area of improvement. Showing other games scores and even highlights would be great.
The advertising ship has sailed, but a guy can dream.
10. Patsies: Get rid of FCS outside of UNI (I have no problem playing UNI over some small southern school) and schedule some "fun" opponents. North Texas, imo, is a good one as it brings back Mac. No more Tennessee Tech. I don't think the scheduling is anywhere near as bad as some claim it is. Playing Pitt is a good matchup, Illinois State is not, should be a MAC-level team. I thought Iowa had a fun, intriguing schedule last year, but it leads in to the final point:
There is a happy medium.
11. Winning: This is, imo, all about winning. 10-4 this year? Fans ecstatic about next year. 12-2 this year? Sold out and screaming for more. It is about wins, plain and simple. Winning gets rid of the (now annoying incessant) "product on the field" stuff around here. We are all (well most of us) hoping for more next year.
Totally agree, but easier said than done. Some of these were more of a comments about live football experience in general. Look at Florida or Miami. Yes, they are losing but their attendance is horrible given their history.
Response in italics.Originally posted by Urohawk:
I responded in bold. For the most part I agree with most of your points.....just conversing (not arguing).Originally posted by theIowaHawk:
Some good points are made here. I am specifically leaving out the additional points another poster added, as I don't think they are good.
Specific criticisms:
1. I would like to have a beer with my hotdog.
I don't drive near as far, but I still drink with my food. I can understand others who don't, and would like to.
2. I will tell you it is annoying not to have score updates which is why I want it. They can't seem to get the big screen to even give B10 scores at a reliable time.
This much we completely agree on. They put up a gigantic ribbon that can, apparently, show whatever they want. Why not scores, at least B10, most teams are playing at the same time.
3. I really don't think the food matters that much. Sure, could improve the quality of what is currently provided (not a fan of the new hot dogs), but having, say, bbq nachos like at Kauffman simply won't work and I wouldn't want it to. The seats are crowded, by necessity, there is hardly room for eating the minimal nachos they offer now. We've "gotten by" without this for a very long time, and IF the team wins, I think everyone agrees it won't be needed to pull people in (unlike a small market baseball team for example).
True on food drawing crowds, but is a nice perk. If you ever been to the bighouse, a lot of stuff is outside the stadium because they have packed the stadium so damn full.
5. I don't know why you don't think they should go (yes, I leave the 3 yo at home).
I'm not saying they shouldn't go, I'm saying catering to them is not the solution. We don't need to encourage more of it to solve the problem of adults not attending.
They become fans of Iowa which they probably wouldn't living here in KC (KU or KSU is easier to cheer for because of friends).
I'm not sure I agree with this. It seems their parent is a Hawkeye fan, most likely the kids would be as well anyways. I do understand that out-of-state fandom would be different. Hopefully those 1 or 2 games / year keeps them coming back.
To use Kaufman as an example, they have mini golf, a turf kids baseball diamonds, pitching machines, playgrounds etc. If IA slips they may have the same issues a mediocre small market baseball team has.
Yes, and I love Kauffman, but baseball is a very different animal. There are, imo, many many more children at baseball games, but beyond that there are many many many more games and much more downtime, things to keep kids entertained is important. I don't think football carries that same necessity.
6. You're 100% right. I just don't like the idea of paying extra for
better seats. I think the guy who has tickets for 30 years should get
the 50 yd line tickets.
So you don't think higher prices = better seats, just longer attendance = better seats. I can see that, but not sure I agree. If there is no reseating, there may be (can't really speak for myself on this) many people who can't get "great" seats and therefore simply won't go.
I don't think prices are that bad (especially if you adjust the W/L record). I am in a $200 donation section and choose not to be in the higher or lower ones. If I couldn't get better seats due, mostly, to my age, I'm not sure what I would think. I probably wouldn't care and might be incentive to keep tickets a very long time.
Maybe some priority point (or longevity) system that can waive the donation? Hell, even priority points are largely based on donation levels. Should a donor of $1Million, but a new ticket holder be relegated to worse seats due to being new?
11. Totally agree, but easier said than done. Some of these were more of a comments about live football experience in general. Look at Florida or Miami. Yes, they are losing but their attendance is horrible given their history.
And it is Florida. I hold Iowans to a higher standard. Fans will be back (once the Ws start flowing back in).
Ridiculous hyperbole doesn't further your btching and moaning.Originally posted by Vroom_C14:
You apparently go to great lengths yourself if you are trying to convince anyone that what Iowa has done the past 3-4 years is "exciting". If what I mentioned above is your idea of "exciting" then enjoy it. It isn't to me.
I'm not shoving "exciting" in your face, please feel free to quote where I have. You are comparing an Iowa game to a f******* Titans game. Come on.
To your question "Why don't they play in Kinnick" - they don't have rights to, noone does.
Good one, bet you feel like you won that one.
Would they sell out? That's just a silly question, of course not - but hey how did Kinnick do in 2013\2014 (A streak of 30 consecutive sellouts at Kinnick Stadium ended on Nov. 23, 2012, when an announced crowd of 69,805 watched the Hawkeyes' 13-7 loss to Nebraska). As has been stated on these boards before what "sold out" means doesn't equate to butts in the seats either. '
Ok, I should have seen this argument coming. Iowa doesn't sell out, so there! Would the Titans even hit 5,000? Why not? Surely they are more exciting.
The 10-10 (home record) record also wishes Iowa could've done better. A look at the Kinnick losses since 2012 includes consecutive losses to rivals Iowa State (2012 and this season) and Wisconsin (2012 and '14). There was that nasty 32-31 loss to Central Michigan of the Powerful Mid-American Conference in 2012. The Hawkeyes went into last season's game against Michigan State with a 4-1 record and fell 26-14 to a comparable program that went on to win the Rose Bowl.
Now you are just lumping complaints in to this, and I don't know why. Use whatever invented definition you would like, there was exciting football played this year, maybe not at all times, but especially when you compare it to the CEDAR RAPIDS TITANS. Did you attend the games this year? Did you watch?
And who isn't "wishing Iowa could've done better?"
You get excited (look back at your posts as you kept saying "exciting" in them) about the status quo - good for you - enjoy. There are some games of Iowa's that are exciting, but the ROI to me isn't worth it, it is to you - again enjoy. You don't think that high scoring, fast paced games are exciting - I get that.Originally posted by theIowaHawk:
Ridiculous hyperbole doesn't further your btching and moaning.Originally posted by Vroom_C14:
You apparently go to great lengths yourself if you are trying to convince anyone that what Iowa has done the past 3-4 years is "exciting". If what I mentioned above is your idea of "exciting" then enjoy it. It isn't to me.
I'm not shoving "exciting" in your face, please feel free to quote where I have. You are comparing an Iowa game to a f******* Titans game. Come on.
To your question "Why don't they play in Kinnick" - they don't have rights to, noone does.
Good one, bet you feel like you won that one.
Would they sell out? That's just a silly question, of course not - but hey how did Kinnick do in 2013\2014 (A streak of 30 consecutive sellouts at Kinnick Stadium ended on Nov. 23, 2012, when an announced crowd of 69,805 watched the Hawkeyes' 13-7 loss to Nebraska). As has been stated on these boards before what "sold out" means doesn't equate to butts in the seats either. '
Ok, I should have seen this argument coming. Iowa doesn't sell out, so there! Would the Titans even hit 5,000? Why not? Surely they are more exciting.
The 10-10 (home record) record also wishes Iowa could've done better. A look at the Kinnick losses since 2012 includes consecutive losses to rivals Iowa State (2012 and this season) and Wisconsin (2012 and '14). There was that nasty 32-31 loss to Central Michigan of the Powerful Mid-American Conference in 2012. The Hawkeyes went into last season's game against Michigan State with a 4-1 record and fell 26-14 to a comparable program that went on to win the Rose Bowl.
Now you are just lumping complaints in to this, and I don't know why. Use whatever invented definition you would like, there was exciting football played this year, maybe not at all times, but especially when you compare it to the CEDAR RAPIDS TITANS. Did you attend the games this year? Did you watch?
And who isn't "wishing Iowa could've done better?"
Straw men and moving goalposts. You fit in well around here.Originally posted by Vroom_C14:
You get excited (look back at your posts as you kept saying "exciting" in them) about the status quo - good for you - enjoy. There are some games of Iowa's that are exciting, but the ROI to me isn't worth it, it is to you - again enjoy. You don't think that high scoring, fast paced games are exciting - I get that.
You asked the question about "why don't they play in Kinnick" if you don't like the answer, oh well.
Speaking of hyperbole - look at some of your own statements...
Later.