ADVERTISEMENT

Opinion: McConnell has given Democrats the justification they need to kill the filibuster

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,441
58,932
113
Opinion by
Donna F. Edwards
Contributing columnist
September 25, 2021 at 12:52 p.m. EDT


News flash: The Grand Old Party, also known as the Deadbeat Republican Party, is unwilling to pay the bills and ready to turn off the lights in America. No principles here; this is all about politics — no matter the consequences of this deliberately inflicted economic crisis with a global pandemic and multiple natural disasters as a backdrop.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) pronounced that no Republican would cast a vote to increase the debt ceiling. That moved the goal post, because he’s effectively threatening a filibuster if 10 Senate Republicans do not join Democrats to advance the measure. With classic McConnell cynicism, he declared that the government must pay its bills while announcing that Republicans won’t sign the checks. That was the reveal. Not to be outdone, every single House Republican voted against both increasing the debt limit and keeping the government running when funding runs out on Oct. 1.
Just as Republicans have fallen in line with the “big lie” about the 2020 election, undermining confidence in our democracy and its constitutional norms, they are now prepared to set fire to the entire house by tanking our economy. But this despicable move can give Democrats exactly the ammunition they need — a genuine, defensible justification for eliminating the filibuster.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Capitol Hill on Sept. 21 in Washington, D.C. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)
Democrats should call McConnell’s bluff. Kill the filibuster, raise the debt ceiling to pay our bills, fund the U.S. government. And then be free to move on and pass the broader agenda that the majority of voters want.
Republicans falsely claim that the debt ceiling needs to be raised to pay for President Biden’s Build Back Better Act. But as McConnell and his fellow Deadbeats know, the bills to be paid include the bipartisan $1.9 trillion covid-19 relief spending package passed in March and the Trump-era spending spree that racked up a historic $7.8 trillion in debt, including a 2017 tax cut that is projected to add $1.9 trillion in debt. They’re taking a page from the Donald Trump playbook — borrow, run up the bills and walk away from your creditors.
Government shutdowns don’t come cheap—the last three shutdowns cost nearly $4 billion, and that doesn’t include all the downstream costs and damage to the lives of ordinary Americans. If civil servants aren’t on the job to process Social Security payments or veterans’ benefits, people will be hurt. Your neighbor with a job at a nearby military installation or federal agency is one of a couple million workers who will get furloughed. If you’re a law enforcement officer or other essential worker in the federal force, you’ll have to show up for work, but you won’t be paid. If you own a coffee shop or diner or florist frequented by those government workers, you lose your customers. The pandemic may have already curtailed your business, but the Deadbeat Republican Party’s shutdown will finish you off.
For at least the last decade, the Republican Party has manufactured fiscal crises while Democrats have governed through them like responsible adults on a playground filled with unruly toddlers — no offense to toddlers. It was Democrats who delivered the votes to George W. Bush to keep the economy from crashing in 2008. In 2013, when Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) engineered a 16-day government shutdown, then-House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and her Democrats came to the rescue to keep the government doors open. In 2019, Trump and congressional Republicans forced a shutdown over funding a border wall — it lasted a record 35 days at a price tag of $11 billion.
The word “hypocritical” is painfully inadequate for describing the Republican playbook. Under Trump and Bush, Republicans raised the debt ceiling. When Barack Obama held the White House, Republicans threatened to wreck our credit by refusing to increase the debt ceiling, resulting in a downgrade of our credit rating. Now that Biden is president . . . you guessed it: The Deadbeat Republican Party delivers once more.
Democrats, it’s time to flex your majority muscle, slim though it may be. Kill the filibuster and raise the debt ceiling to keep this country running. And then, having freed yourselves to govern the way most Americans want . . . start doing it. Pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act to save our democracy, and for good measure throw in police reform by passing the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act. It’s one thing for the Deadbeat Republican Party to take itself down, but it should leave the rest of us alone so we can move forward.

 
Mitch gave justification a long ago. Dems have just been too chickenshit to use it. If the shoe was on the other foot, Rs would have killed the filibuster years ago.
I don't think they are too afraid...I think we have some Democrats who are paid off not to do so. The majority of America wants the democratic policies - even Republican voters agree with some of it - but instead of moving forward with these polices, the clock is going to run out, the minimal control the Democrats do have is going to go away in a year. McConnell basically is admitting that a Republican controlled Senate will never allow a liberal justice. The minority is running shit to the point where the majority is going to be powerless to actually win elections in the next 5 years...unless the Democrats in power do something right damn now.
 
I don't think they are too afraid...I think we have some Democrats who are paid off not to do so. The majority of America wants the democratic policies - even Republican voters agree with some of it - but instead of moving forward with these polices, the clock is going to run out, the minimal control the Democrats do have is going to go away in a year. McConnell basically is admitting that a Republican controlled Senate will never allow a liberal justice. The minority is running shit to the point where the majority is going to be powerless to actually win elections in the next 5 years...unless the Democrats in power do something right damn now.
I agree. Sinema and Manchin are corrupt. I would love to see them gone. And the rest of the Dems seem open to reform, which I guess is at least something. My real frustration comes in Obama's first two years. It was painfully clear the Rs were hellbent on blocking everything, yet the Dems let it happen. 59 votes and they still let the Rs screw us. We could have lost 9 Dems and still passed filibuster reform. Such a lost opportunity.
 
The bills are allowed to be paid by the debt ceiling. The funds were already spent if you don’t raise the ceiling you don’t pay the bill. Most of you don’t know how this works but have a lot to say.
I just read in another thread today that a lot of males have decided to skip a college education, although this would not require said education to understand it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
I agree. Sinema and Manchin are corrupt. I would love to see them gone. And the rest of the Dems seem open to reform, which I guess is at least something. My real frustration comes in Obama's first two years. It was painfully clear the Rs were hellbent on blocking everything, yet the Dems let it happen. 59 votes and they still let the Rs screw us. We could have lost 9 Dems and still passed filibuster reform. Such a lost opportunity.
What you call "reform" most of America recognizes as Stalinism. Bend to our will and shut-up, freedom be damned.
 
I agree. Sinema and Manchin are corrupt. I would love to see them gone. And the rest of the Dems seem open to reform, which I guess is at least something. My real frustration comes in Obama's first two years. It was painfully clear the Rs were hellbent on blocking everything, yet the Dems let it happen. 59 votes and they still let the Rs screw us. We could have lost 9 Dems and still passed filibuster reform. Such a lost opportunity.

Corrupt is a good word. We really shouldn’t call them moderate or centrist. Giving republicans everything they want with their assistance hardly seems moderate. It is obstructive. If a Supreme Court spot opened up today, I doubt it could be filled by 2024.
 
Manchin won't end the filibuster to protect democracy.

Manchin won't end the filibuster to fight climate change.

Will he end it to keep the US government from defaulting on its debts?

The good Dems need to stick to their guns. Don't let Manchin and the GOP weasel their way out of this.
 
I hope the end it…do it now. You all know it will be just like when Harry changed the rules. It will come back to bite you
Mitch changed the SCOTUS rules, so the Dems wouldn't filibuster them, but you already knew that. Mitch also changed his own rule about voting on a SCOTUS justice in an election year. He changed it from being over a year to go until the next election to just a couple of weeks left before a presidential election, even after some presidential votes had already been cast.

And, the reason Harry changed the federal justice nomination rules was because Mitch's crew was blocking all of Obama's nominations.

See a pattern of total obstruction here?

Probably not.
 
A link to politico to explain your feelings?
Like my darn fiancé…always wanting my feelings.
It’s actually simple. The system is entirely broken. Democrats and Republicans have a vastly different view of what America should be now and what it should look like in the future. I agree…kill the filibuster and let the majority party pass whatever they want. The minority party will be there for committees and such. If a party gets total control like in Obama, Trump, and Biden first two years, let them pass all kinds of shit. Just know, both sides will do it
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThorneStockton
Somehow I think Mitch would love to see the Democrats kill the filibuster. He'd be like a kid in the candy store when the Republican's regain control.

What kind of candy is in a GOP candy store though? It's not hard to think of all the things that various Democrat groups are interested in from huge infrastructure spending, to huge "infrastructure" spending, tax the rich, universal health care, immigration, etc. There's all sorts of things they want to do.

I guess the candy could just simply be undoing the things the Democrats do. They could cut taxes again. Maybe some sort of national voter ID thing. I don't know how or if even there is way to legislate their current culture war, grievance politics, maybe undo some civil rights stuff or anti-immigrant or anti-China stuff?

I mean their platform in 2020 was essentially: We're with Trump. There is seemingly core ideology or platform.
 
What kind of candy is in a GOP candy store though? It's not hard to think of all the things that various Democrat groups are interested in from huge infrastructure spending, to huge "infrastructure" spending, tax the rich, universal health care, immigration, etc. There's all sorts of things they want to do.

I guess the candy could just simply be undoing the things the Democrats do. They could cut taxes again. Maybe some sort of national voter ID thing. I don't know how or if even there is way to legislate their current culture war, grievance politics, maybe undo some civil rights stuff or anti-immigrant or anti-China stuff?

I mean their platform in 2020 was essentially: We're with Trump. There is seemingly core ideology or platform.
LOL, the GOP spends like a drunken sailor, just like the Democrats, they worry about the national debt the minute the Dems take office.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ihhawk
LOL, the GOP spends like a drunken sailor, just like the Democrats, they worry about the national debt the minute the Dems take office.

So what is their candy? What is McConnell itching to get passed that he can't because of the filibuster but will be able to if it was gone?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
What kind of candy is in a GOP candy store though? It's not hard to think of all the things that various Democrat groups are interested in from huge infrastructure spending, to huge "infrastructure" spending, tax the rich, universal health care, immigration, etc. There's all sorts of things they want to do.

I guess the candy could just simply be undoing the things the Democrats do. They could cut taxes again. Maybe some sort of national voter ID thing. I don't know how or if even there is way to legislate their current culture war, grievance politics, maybe undo some civil rights stuff or anti-immigrant or anti-China stuff?

I mean their platform in 2020 was essentially: We're with Trump. There is seemingly core ideology or platform.
This is actually a great point. The only thing that I can see them doing proactively would be tax cuts.

actually, I could see them butchering social programs as well.
 
This is actually a great point. The only thing that I can see them doing proactively would be tax cuts.

actually, I could see them butchering social programs as well.

It's a great "benefit" of being conservative. You're not expected to do new things, or solve something, at least for the most part. You're supposed to stop the Democrats from destroying the country and turning it into Venezuela.

Republicans benefit from the filibuster from that perspective as it's easier to stop the Democrats and prevent them from getting "wins". It also makes it easier to justify doing nothing, you just blame insufficient numbers and the evil Democrats who wouldn't support the "America is The Best Act".

I'm not even sure they'd butcher social programs. I'm sure some would love to on principle, but they also know that the programs are often popular in effect, just not in marketing. It would beg the question though, why don't they kill the evil socialist programs? You have the votes now, there is no filibuster, you could do it if you wanted to.

We saw a similar show with the ACA repeal efforts.
 
Mitch changed the SCOTUS rules, so the Dems wouldn't filibuster them, but you already knew that. Mitch also changed his own rule about voting on a SCOTUS justice in an election year. He changed it from being over a year to go until the next election to just a couple of weeks left before a presidential election, even after some presidential votes had already been cast.

And, the reason Harry changed the federal justice nomination rules was because Mitch's crew was blocking all of Obama's nominations.

See a pattern of total obstruction here?

Probably not.
Can you explain how he changed this rule on voting for a scotus candidate.
He had the power to just change a rule?
Was their a vote to change the rule that passed?
What code/rule in the by-laws changed?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT