ADVERTISEMENT

Opinion The all-volunteer force is dying. Here’s how to save it.

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,442
58,936
113
Mark T. Esper was defense secretary from 2019 to 2020 and is the author of “A Sacred Oath: Memoirs of a Secretary of Defense During Extraordinary Times.”
America’s all-volunteer force is slowly dying. And unless we take action soon to reverse the trend, we are putting our nation’s future security at risk.


This year, the all-volunteer force’s 50th, has been another tough one for military recruiting. The largest services will all miss their recruiting targets. The Army, which fell short last year by 15,000 recruits — 25 percent of its annual goal — expects to fall short by over 15 percent this year. The Navy and Air Force will also miss their marks by thousands.

Experts point to a variety of reasons, such as insufficient pay and benefits, a difficult work-life balance, fear of personal harm, and a relatively good job market. Some on the right say military “wokeness” is the problem; some on the left blame sexual assault and discrimination in the ranks.


Military professionals tell me all these factors are at play. But even if these issues were “fixed,” the all-volunteer force’s long-term decline will continue.
The fact is, the pool of Americans aged 17 to 24 who are qualified and interested in serving continues to shrink. When I was Army secretary in 2017, 71 percent of these 34 million young people could not meet the military’s entry requirements, mostly because of obesity, drug abuse, and physical and mental health problems. That number is even higher now. About half of the 23 percent remaining who are eligible to serve today decide to attend college. At the same time, the share of the entire cohort with a propensity to serve has dropped from 13 percent to 9 percent. That leaves fewer than 500,00 potential recruits. It’s hard to believe that a nation of 333 million people can’t produce a larger pool.


The numbers are all heading in the wrong direction, driven by broader cultural and lifestyle trends and a society unfamiliar with the 0.5 percent of their fellow citizens who defend them. When the draft ended in 1973, many young people had a family connection to the armed forces, someone who could explain military life. Today, that number is far lower, creating a “knowledge gap” that inhibits most from even considering serving. It also explains why nearly 80 percent of today’s recruits have a relative who has served. A military caste seems to have emerged over time, further isolating the military from society and undermining civilian-military relations.


The scope and scale of these trends are beyond the means of the Pentagon alone to remedy. Given the consequences, this is a challenge to our national security that must be addressed at the highest levels.

The White House and Congress need to work together to reverse the slide. They should begin by setting up a bipartisan commission of esteemed leaders, much as was done in 1969 to create the all-volunteer force — but this time, the mission would be to save it. To do that, commissioners would have to focus on two key issues: increasing the pool of young people qualified to serve and raising their interest in doing so.

For reasons that also extend beyond the military’s needs, such a commission should look at ways to improve the health and fitness of the nation’s youth, from resurrecting the long-abandoned Presidential Fitness Test to ensuring that physical education classes are part of every student’s daily schedule. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, fewer than 30 percent of today’s high school students exercise on a daily basis


The Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery, the military’s enlistment test for academic eligibility, should be overhauled to ensure that it’s appropriate to the occupational specialties the military needs and that young people are allowed more time, tools and attempts to pass it. Medical requirements for service, such as allowing more waivers for kids with allergies, long-past conditions, and old sports injuries should be simplified.
JROTC, a proven program that not only helps teenagers develop important life skills but also familiarizes them with the military, should be expanded nationally with its own funding to ensure better geographic representation and opportunity for all. Less than 20 percent of high schools offer JROTC. At the same time, Congress must once and for all give military recruiters the same access to U.S. high schools that colleges and prospective employers enjoy. This is not happening, and many young adults are being denied a credible career path as a result.

While these initiatives and others are being explored, the Pentagon must steer away from lowering standards, reducing the military’s size, and creating hollow — i.e., undermanned — combat formations. We must field the force we need to win our nation’s wars, not take shortcuts.


Our elected leaders must also educate and inspire our youth by addressing their concerns and misconceptions, extolling the virtues of military duty and discussing the benefits and opportunities that come with service. They should also seek the assistance of sports figures, entertainers and others who exert influence over young Americans to help promote these messages.
With threats from China and elsewhere growing, we cannot ignore this issue. Most solutions will take years to bear fruit. But if we are to deter war, be victorious if it comes and safeguard our democracy, we will need to maintain a sizable high-quality force of volunteers. That means today’s leaders must act now to entice the next great generation of Americans to serve.
 
Just make it easy. Compulsory service for 18 year olds, like the Nordic countries do.
 
That IMO is the biggest reason they are having trouble.

Gen Z spent their entire childhoods watching us fight in wars that we later decided where not worth fighting in the first place. How can you expect them to sign up to potentially risk their lives for another American Whoopsy Daisy.
Probably some truth to that.

Do 4 years....get your associates for free while in...go to school paid for AND get a housing and book allowance once you're out (ranges between $1800-$2400 or so a month depending on area)

If that ain't boosting recruitment (no college debt) I'm not sure what will.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Probably some truth to that.

Do 4 years....get your associates for free while in...go to school paid for AND get a housing and book allowance once you're out (ranges between $1800-$2400 or so a month depending on area)

If that ain't boosting recruitment (no college debt) I'm not sure what will.

How is that different from the GI bill?
 
Sounds like the military is facing a problem similar to business - lack of qualified, interested candidates.

And, just like business, they need to make the job "better". More attractive to potential candidates.

The only thing I can think of to increase wages in this country is a shortage of workers. Now that we have one, the employers, including the government, are going to have to pony up.
 
I don’t know if compulsory military service is the answer. Maybe. I always thought the smaller countries did it because it’s the only way to have a big enough defense force and the theocracies and dictatorships did it as a form of control.

I’d be all for some sort of service to nation and community requirement. Training as firefighters, paramedics, nurses aids, etc as a substitute for the military training, but something you can be called on by the government to put into action for so many years after you’re certified. Start training in one class a year in jr year of highschool or something. It sure would be nice for every able bodied person to have a skill that could be called into action in times of need.
 
I don’t know if compulsory military service is the answer. Maybe. I always thought the smaller countries did it because it’s the only way to have a big enough defense force and the theocracies and dictatorships did it as a form of control.

I’d be all for some sort of service to nation and community requirement. Training as firefighters, paramedics, nurses aids, etc as a substitute for the military training, but something you can be called on by the government to put into action for so many years after you’re certified. Start training in one class a year in jr year of highschool or something. It sure would be nice for every able bodied person to have a skill that could be called into action in times of need.

I think compulsory is only really necessary when you are under threat. Most of the nations that do that are under threat from someone nearby.

I'm not too worried about an invasion from Canada or Mexico.

I think compulsory service in our situation makes little sense and would be politically non-viable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
If Army starts to pay better than mercenary forces US has been using around the world, how short are we on bodies? I understand the US likes having the mercs to do illegal stuff, I'm just asking questions
 
Pay better.

When my kid was in the Army and was married with a kid, his pay was so low that they qualified for wick and other low income benefits. Pretty sad that you can be in the military, get deployed during a war and still fall below basic income guidelines.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Probably some truth to that.

Do 4 years....get your associates for free while in...go to school paid for AND get a housing and book allowance once you're out (ranges between $1800-$2400 or so a month depending on area)

If that ain't boosting recruitment (no college debt) I'm not sure what will.

Not sure about the other services, but the Army get free tuition (IIRC, up to $400 per credit hour and up to $4000 per semester) at cooperative schools (which is most state and many private colleges). Plus the GI bill when they get out.

There's really no reason a Soldier can't do 4 years and have at least an AA, and possibly more, when they ETS. Plus most of the rest paid for after they get out.

Granted, it wasn't in 4 years, but I got my BA and MA for free from the Army while I was in. And got an additional BS using my GI bill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: binsfeldcyhawk2
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT