ADVERTISEMENT

Opinion What Nikki Haley and Tim Scott are offering Republicans

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,923
59,565
113
By Paul Waldman
Columnist|
February 15, 2023 at 11:08 a.m. EST
Sen. Tim Scott on Feb. 9. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)

A pair of 2024 presidential candidates from South Carolina — one who just entered the race and another who may soon — are demonstrating anew that race is at the heart of Republican politics. There’s a very particular story GOP voters want to hear about race, and these candidates will give it to them.
Sign up for a weekly roundup of thought-provoking ideas and debates
Start with Nikki Haley, former governor and Donald Trump’s ambassador to the United Nations, who is delivering her first campaign speech on Wednesday. In her announcement video, Haley talks about discrimination she faced as the daughter of Indian immigrants. “The railroad tracks divided the town by race,” she says.
Nikki Haley challenges Trump and enters presidential race
1:28
Nikki Haley touts her identity and GOP credentials in presidential race announcement and calls for a “new generation of leadership". (Video: Billy Tucker/The Washington Post, Photo: Nikki Haley for President/The Washington Post)
But in Haley’s telling, racism is an echo of bygone times. “Some look at our past as evidence that America’s founding principles are bad,” she says as a reference to the 1619 Project appears on the screen. “Some think our ideas are not just wrong, but racist and evil. Nothing could be further from the truth.”
Haley uses her credibility as a non-White figure to tell Republicans that racism is no longer much of a problem, says Stanford political scientist and native South Carolinian Hakeem Jefferson.

Follow Paul Waldman's opinionsFollow
“The Republican Party is willing to give its members of color some leeway to talk about race and racism,” Jefferson told me, “but there’s only so far they can go.”
The key for Haley is that racism is a completed story: It happened then; now it’s over, and we can all feel good about where we’ve come. White Republicans tell this story, too: In her response to President Biden’s State of the Union address, Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders talked about the Little Rock Nine and how proud she is “of the progress our country has made.”
As governor, Haley appointed then-Rep. Tim Scott to fill a vacant Senate seat, and now Scott is reportedly preparing his own presidential run. Scott similarly reassures conservatives about their own racial innocence even as, from time to time, he acknowledges the reality of racism he himself faces.
Scott gave a moving speech in 2016 in which he said he’d been pulled over by police seven times in one year, “for nothing more than driving a new car in the wrong neighborhood.” He told of other Black men, friends and relatives, who had been treated the same way. “Imagine the frustration, the irritation, the sense of a loss of dignity that accompanies each of those stops,” he said then.
But then there’s also the Tim Scott who echoes the right’s caricatures of critical race theory, saying in a speech, “Teaching kids that some are oppressors is just as bad as teaching other kids that they are always going to be victims,” and, in a Republican response to Biden’s first address to Congress, that “America is not a racist country.”
Scott’s message is that racism is not an institutional or systemic problem but an individual failing. That’s precisely what conservatives want to hear, so they can say, “Well I’m not a racist!” Which means we don’t have to do much of anything about racism, especially systemic racism, other than getting rid of what Scott calls “bad apples” if we happen to locate them.
Scott talks about getting pulled over, but he inevitably turns back to the story of racial progress. “It’s a way of talking about race that hardly offends the system to which these folks are so committed,” Jefferson says.
It isn’t just conservatives who are drawn to the mythology of racial progress, Jefferson says. “Many Americans across ideological lines tend to prefer and believe in” the idea that we’re always moving forward on race.
That’s what Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign offered liberals (and some conservatives): the opportunity to believe that a new and final racial reconciliation was possible. As a student at the University of South Carolina in 2008, Jefferson was at Obama’s victory party after the state’s primary where supporters chanted “Race doesn’t matter! Race doesn’t matter!” — their hearts bursting with the promise of a post-racial America.
“It’s so enticing,” Jefferson says about the idea of inexorable racial progress, but “these moments are often met with backlash.” Like the one we’re in right now.
The Trumpist political project is built on that backlash, which could make candidates like Haley and Scott even more valuable to the Republican Party as living testaments to the GOP’s supposed commitment to racial equality. They seem committed to a version of history that sanitizes the past — not to mention the GOP’s racial politics — and makes us all participants in a tale of triumphant reconciliation.
Even as Republicans remove books on racism from libraries and limit classroom discussion of race in numerous states, they claim to be the true warriors for equality. It is the liberals, they say, who want us racially divided.
Haley and Scott are already happily making that argument.

 
Haley uses her credibility as a non-White figure to tell Republicans that racism is no longer much of a problem, says Stanford political scientist and native South Carolinian Hakeem Jefferson.
Her father was a university professor and her mother was a lawyer, teacher, and owner of a successful clothing store for over 20 years. Haley attended a private K-12 college-prep school before going to college at Clemson.
 
And it appears that the two schools that merged to form the prep school she attended - Wade Hampton Academy and Willington Academy - were segregated up until the merger in 1986...meaning Haley attended an all-white private school if she was there K-12. Both institutions are listed in the National Register of Historic Places as being "associated with White Resistance."

According to the Boston Globe in 1989: "[o]ne black student, the son of a physician, studied at Orangeburg Prep until his family moved back to Ohio recently." 1989, coincidentally, is the year Haley graduated

That would be worth exploring.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ICHerky
Her father was a university professor and her mother was a lawyer, teacher, and owner of a successful clothing store for over 20 years. Haley attended a private K-12 college-prep school before going to college at Clemson.
So? Is your point that minorities have to be poor and stupid and if they are not, their opinions are meaningless? Racist much?
 
And it appears that the two schools that merged to form the prep school she attended - Wade Hampton Academy and Willington Academy - were segregated up until the merger in 1986...meaning Haley attended an all-white private school if she was there K-12. Both institutions are listed in the National Register of Historic Places as being "associated with White Resistance."

According to the Boston Globe in 1989: "[o]ne black student, the son of a physician, studied at Orangeburg Prep until his family moved back to Ohio recently." 1989, coincidentally, is the year Haley graduated

That would be worth exploring.
Why, so you can try and justify your racist comment?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ICHerky
They are offering more of the same neo-con B.S. the ruling class has been pushing for years, no thanks to both of these disingenuous losers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nelly02
Scott and Haley will bring out the absolute worst of the D's...just have to go into attack mode with racial undertones, it's the play book.

I don't think it plays well with Independents.
I am not understanding this. Are you saying the Dems will use race against Scott and Haley?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ree4
I am not understanding this. Are you saying the Dems will use race against Scott and Haley?
Of course...they won't be blatant about it because that'd be problematic. They'll just let their surrogates at MSNBC do the dirty work.



 
Of course...they won't be blatant about it because that'd be problematic. They'll just let their surrogates at MSNBC do the dirty work.




One could easily argue Fox News does the exact same thing you’re saying msmbc did.
 
One could easily argue Fox News does the exact same thing you’re saying msmbc did.
Whatabout what? I have been told over and over again Fox is evil and MSNBC is just partisan big difference according to leftists. Leftists hold up MSNBC to a higher standard than Fox but you must not.
 
Whatabout what? I have been told over and over again Fox is evil and MSNBC is just partisan big difference according to leftists. Leftists hold up MSNBC to a higher standard than Fox but you must not.

You will not find a post from me defending MSNBC, I don’t watch them very often.

Considering the news that broke last week about Fox and their coverage of Trumps lies after the election and it’s laughable you think Fox has any standards at all.
 
Of course...they won't be blatant about it because that'd be problematic. They'll just let their surrogates at MSNBC do the dirty work.



So the media not the politicians?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FlickShagwell
You will not find a post from me defending MSNBC, I don’t watch them very often.

Considering the news that broke last week about Fox and their coverage of Trumps lies after the election and it’s laughable you think Fox has any standards at all.
I have never said Fox has standards and you will not see post from me defending them much like you said about MSNBC.
 
Whatabout what? I have been told over and over again Fox is evil and MSNBC is just partisan big difference according to leftists. Leftists hold up MSNBC to a higher standard than Fox but you must not.
Because MSNBC doesn't have lawyers in court defending lies that their hosts admit, under oath, they are telling. This is once again a false equivalency. Can't you guys see anything. Let me know when Rachel Maddow or Nichole Wallace are in court, when they get sued, saying they don't believe what they have been telling their viewers. Good Lord.
 
The left believes that if you treat everyone equally and require equal opportunity but not equality of outcome, you're racist. In actuality it's the difference between capitalism and communism.
 
I always know when I hit the nail on the head because you Tom Paris are like a canary in a coal mine resorting to calling names, because you have no response to a factual statement you despise.
This doesn't help you. You almost never have facts on your side. I don't know what else to tell you. You're one of those far right wackadoos that the people on Comedy Central make fun of. You just don't know it.
 
True...D's will let their surrogates do the dirty work. But they sometimes slip...


Did you read the article?

The GOP senator was reacting to remarks from Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin of Illinois earlier on Wednesday in which he discussed policing reform and said at one point, “What we say on the Democratic side is we cannot waste this historic moment, this singular opportunity. Let’s not do something that is a token, half-hearted approach. Let’s focus instead on making a change that will make a difference in the future of America.”
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
So? Is your point that minorities have to be poor and stupid and if they are not, their opinions are meaningless? Racist much?
I think his point is that worthless dicks like you are basically too stupid to understand shit, other than the lies thrown at you by the fascist news networks.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT