Who all here thinks Hawked needs an attitude adjustment?
I’m willing to stun him then throw a figure four on his sorry ass.
I’m willing to stun him then throw a figure four on his sorry ass.
Packers tears
- Thread starter Hawked
- Start date
Hahaha, and I'm the tool, douchebag, and bitch? You guys...
Yes you are. Sad that you can't see that. Most stupid people are extremely terrible at self awareness though.
Yeah like about last night after the Bears first scored. Oh well. It’s been pretty adorable.
Will you be bad cop in my "Seahawks Tears" post next week? It's Monday Night Football!!
Haha, that was amazing.
I’m gonna EFF all of your guy’s wives just like Rodgers effed the Bears tonight.
1st place Bears! Your tears are delicious and plentiful. Da Bears!!!
Did you just bump a week 1 post in week 3? Thanks for reminding us of this thread. God bless you. Get well soon.
It's week 3, bro. Bears still suck.
Week 3 smack talk to the team you blew a 20-0 lead to in week 1. LOL
It's not really about the team. It's about the office that team holds. That office is called 1st place.
Act like you’ve never been there before. Oh wait, you’re doing it...continue on.
Bears suck, but the Redskins kicked the shit out of the Packers. So that was awesome. I love that Clay Matthews is to stupid to quit committing the same penalty. What an idiot.
From the NFL
Calling it a “textbook” case of roughing, Hochuli said that the hit by Matthews falls squarely within the point of emphasis regarding the roughing passer foul, as it relates to the placement of all or most of the defender’s body weight on the passer.
“They’ve been calling it this way for six weeks,” Hochuli said. “It’s as clear of an example of roughing the passer as you could have.”
So what should Matthews have done differently? Hochuli said that the solution is simple. Matthews had two steps before hitting Smith. The league expects Matthews in that situation to hit him and roll to the side, landing with Matthews’ body weight on the ground, not on the passer.
“If I could show an example of fully body weight on a passer,” Hochuli said, “that would be the play.”
https://sports.yahoo.com/nfl-clay-matthews-hit-alex-002540306.html
Calling it a “textbook” case of roughing, Hochuli said that the hit by Matthews falls squarely within the point of emphasis regarding the roughing passer foul, as it relates to the placement of all or most of the defender’s body weight on the passer.
“They’ve been calling it this way for six weeks,” Hochuli said. “It’s as clear of an example of roughing the passer as you could have.”
So what should Matthews have done differently? Hochuli said that the solution is simple. Matthews had two steps before hitting Smith. The league expects Matthews in that situation to hit him and roll to the side, landing with Matthews’ body weight on the ground, not on the passer.
“If I could show an example of fully body weight on a passer,” Hochuli said, “that would be the play.”
https://sports.yahoo.com/nfl-clay-matthews-hit-alex-002540306.html
Probably gimpy from all that butt ramming he takes on Saturday night.
I don't know why the penalties are such a shock when they have been calling the weight on the passer for years. The media goes full dumbass on this. Were all of them legit penalties? No. Given this rule can you understand why they were called? I can. You can't have it both ways. Concussions will kill the sport by you have the media focusing on protecting players and bemoaning officials for it. Why? Because it's the packers? The rule is enforced partly because of the packers QB. I'm fine with that. Why is Mathews the poster boy for this? Minnesota had a hit on double dork that was just as "bad" called as a penalty. After the packers vs Redskins game the announcers said the big story from the game was the Mathews penalty? I mean what the actual eff? It was at least a 2 score difference the entire game. How is that penalty the story?
You didn't congratulate me when the Bears beat the best team in the NFL. How come?
