ADVERTISEMENT

Paul Ryan's 7 Favorite Things

Nov 28, 2010
87,377
42,088
113
Maryland
Now that Paul Ryan is Speaker of the House, keep a wary eye out for Ryan’s 7 favorite ideas (they’re also cropping up among Republican presidential candidates):

1. Reduce the top income-tax rate to 25 percent from 35 percent (a huge windfall to the rich at a time when the rich take home a larger share of total income that at any time since the 1920s).

2. Cut corporate taxes to 25 percent from 35 percent (a giant sop to corporations, the largest of which are already socking away $1.2 trillion in foreign tax shelters).

3. Make these cuts without adding the budget deficit by slashing spending on domestic programs like food stamps and education for poor districts (now, 18% of the nation's children are in poverty, and these cuts would only make things worse).

4. Also by turning Medicaid and other federal programs for the poor into block grants to the states, and let the states decide how to allocate them (in other words, give Republican state legislatures and governors slush funds to do with as they wish).

5. And turning Medicare into vouchers that don’t keep up with increases in healthcare costs (which would in effect cut Medicare for the elderly).

6. Deal with rising Social Security costs by raising the retirement age for Social Security (making Social Security even more regressive, since the poor don't live nearly as long as the rich).

7. Finally, don’t raise the minimum wage but let it continue to decline as inflation makes it irrelevant; instead, provide poor workers with a larger Earned Income Tax Credit (enlarging the EITC is a good idea, but we need a higher minimum as well).

Bottom line: Beware Paul Ryan.

[from Robert Reich on Facebook]
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
And yet mostly right.

Funny how people here so often criticize the person but so seldom have anything useful to say to refute his views.

He actually does get something wrong once in a while, imo, but rarely and he isn't usually too far off.

His commentary doesn't have anything to do with economic science whatsoever. He's a populist masquerading as an economist.
 
1. Reduce the top income-tax rate to 25 percent from 35 percent (a huge windfall to the rich at a time when the rich take home a larger share of total income that at any time since the 1920s).

Let me know when a poor person creates a job. Not sure why a "huge windfall to the rich" is perceived as a bad thing.

2. Cut corporate taxes to 25 percent from 35 percent (a giant sop to corporations, the largest of which are already socking away $1.2 trillion in foreign tax shelters).

Our corporate tax rates are among the highest in the world. Does Reich think no other country has loopholes and shelters?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_tax_rates


3. Make these cuts without adding the budget deficit by slashing spending on domestic programs like food stamps and education for poor districts (now, 18% of the nation's children are in poverty, and these cuts would only make things worse).

Food stamps never lifted parents out of poverty, but a good job will.

4. Also by turning Medicaid and other federal programs for the poor into block grants to the states, and let the states decide how to allocate them (in other words, give Republican state legislatures and governors slush funds to do with as they wish).

This is a good idea. Washington D.C. is not in a position to tell Des Moines what they need.

5. And turning Medicare into vouchers that don’t keep up with increases in healthcare costs (which would in effect cut Medicare for the elderly).

Vouchers are wonderful things. They force people to shop around. Co-pays are terrible things. Consumers have no incentive to shop around for the best price.

6. Deal with rising Social Security costs by raising the retirement age for Social Security (making Social Security even more regressive, since the poor don't live nearly as long as the rich).

Total bullshit. When Social Security was enacted, the average life span was 62. Today it's 79. Claiming that raising the retirement age is "regressive" is about the most retarded thing I've ever heard.

7. Finally, don’t raise the minimum wage but let it continue to decline as inflation makes it irrelevant; instead, provide poor workers with a larger Earned Income Tax Credit (enlarging the EITC is a good idea, but we need a higher minimum as well).

Actually, we need to abolish the minimum wage at the Federal level. Again, what's good for New York is not necessarily good for Mississippi.

Reich is a populist turd. His opinions are not based on any sort of economic science. His opinions are based on his political ideology.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: HawkeyeHitman
Now that Paul Ryan is Speaker of the House, keep a wary eye out for Ryan’s 7 favorite ideas (they’re also cropping up among Republican presidential candidates):

1. Reduce the top income-tax rate to 25 percent from 35 percent (a huge windfall to the rich at a time when the rich take home a larger share of total income that at any time since the 1920s).

2. Cut corporate taxes to 25 percent from 35 percent (a giant sop to corporations, the largest of which are already socking away $1.2 trillion in foreign tax shelters).

3. Make these cuts without adding the budget deficit by slashing spending on domestic programs like food stamps and education for poor districts (now, 18% of the nation's children are in poverty, and these cuts would only make things worse).

4. Also by turning Medicaid and other federal programs for the poor into block grants to the states, and let the states decide how to allocate them (in other words, give Republican state legislatures and governors slush funds to do with as they wish).

5. And turning Medicare into vouchers that don’t keep up with increases in healthcare costs (which would in effect cut Medicare for the elderly).

6. Deal with rising Social Security costs by raising the retirement age for Social Security (making Social Security even more regressive, since the poor don't live nearly as long as the rich).

7. Finally, don’t raise the minimum wage but let it continue to decline as inflation makes it irrelevant; instead, provide poor workers with a larger Earned Income Tax Credit (enlarging the EITC is a good idea, but we need a higher minimum as well).

Bottom line: Beware Paul Ryan.

[from Robert Reich on Facebook]
They all look like sensible solutions to me
 
His commentary doesn't have anything to do with economic science whatsoever. He's a populist masquerading as an economist.
Trad...that statement is full of BS only you can believe it. You are a fraud. Truly, you are. He understands the economy better than most. He has been much closer to being correct than most. he truly understands that "trickle down" doesn't work.
 
Depends on your definition of "work." The only way to lift people out of poverty is to have a thriving economy that is creating lots of jobs, thereby increasing the demand for labor. If you take away all the excess capital from the rich people, then they can't create jobs with it.
 
Depends on your definition of "work." The only way to lift people out of poverty is to have a thriving economy that is creating lots of jobs, thereby increasing the demand for labor. If you take away all the excess capital from the rich people, then they can't create jobs with it.
That's not the real story. Now because we redistributed and created the strong demand anyone can start a company and become rich without the gate keeper's approval. It's a beautiful little system.
 
That's not the real story. Now because we redistributed and created the strong demand anyone can start a company and become rich without the gate keeper's approval. It's a beautiful little system.

You're only going to create a "strong demand" for cigarettes, liquor and lottery tickets if you take from the rich and give to the poor. There's not enough money to redistribute that would result in a typical poor person having enough money to buy a Subway franchise.
 
You're only going to create a "strong demand" for cigarettes, liquor and lottery tickets if you take from the rich and give to the poor. There's not enough money to redistribute that would result in a typical poor person having enough money to buy a Subway franchise.
Empirically wrong. Most every poster here is a product of redistribution. It's what created the large middle class after WWII.
 
Liberal fantasy, unless you consider war to be "redistributive".
Look it up. The middle class ballooned thanks to education and infrastructure investment subsidized by government redistribution. Redistribution is to thank for making this nation great and is the fertilizer capitalism needs to grow. Take it away and you get the 1930's.
 
Providing compensation to all the men coming back from the war is not "redistribution"... it's paying the bills. Building roads and bridges and dams is not "redistribution"... that's a valid function of government. That's an example of "promoting the general welfare". Roads benefit everyone and can spur growth. Compare and contrast with giving someone money simply because that person doesn't have any and has done nothing to earn it.

And remember, prior to the 30s we had the roaring twenties where everyone was making lots of money, no thanks to anything the government was doing. You act like economic growth is only possible with FDR policies. That's easily refuted.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT