ADVERTISEMENT

Periodic table gains four new superheavy elements

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,507
62,724
113
While you were off celebrating the holidays, the periodic table got a little more complete. Four newly discovered elements managed to squeak their way in just before the end of 2015, filling up the table's seventh row and marking the first additions since 2011.

The four new elements weren't all discovered on Dec. 30, mind. But to gain a spot on the periodic table, an element has to pass muster with the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). Elements at the outer bounds of the periodic table are what chemists call superheavy (a reference to their increasing number of atoms, which correspond to their number on the table), and they're all super unstable. Created artificially by slamming nuclei into one another in the lab, these heavyweight champs last for just tiny fractions of a second before decaying into elements we can't detect.

So when someone claims to have identified an element with an all-time high atomic number, the powers that be have to do a little follow-up. In this case, three of the new elements (115, 117 and 118) were approved with credit to a team of Russian and American scientists from the Russian Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Oak Ridge National Laboratory, while a fourth they had attempted to claim (113) was credited to a team in Japan after IUPAC's assessment.

The elements have the temporary names of ununtrium, ununpentium, ununseptium and ununoctium, which really roll off the tongue. The teams that discovered them can now set about giving them official names.

"To scientists, this is of greater value than an Olympic gold medal," Nobel laureate Ryoji Noyori, former president the Riken institute that discovered element 113, told the Guardian.

IUPAC allows element names based on mythological concepts, minerals, scientists and places -- or, of course, properties of the elements themselves. Once submitted, the names will be checked for their ability to be used by speakers of multiple languages, their consistency with other elements, and other possible conflicts.

After that, the names and their two-letter symbols will be put out for a five-month public review that will culminate in IUPAC's final decision.

Meanwhile, scientists around the world are already working on the superheavy elements that will fill up row number eight.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-periodic-table-elements-20160104-story.html
 
I hope they think up better names too. But this bit caught my eye. "Created artificially by slamming nuclei into one another in the lab, these heavyweight champs last for just tiny fractions of a second before decaying into elements we can't detect."

How do they know there are elements out there we can't detect? Maybe God just didn't like us playing him and took the new creations back to heaven. Maybe the way to heaven is to just get really slammed good. This sort of fits with my new penis Jesus theory.
 
"superheavy (a reference to their increasing number of atoms, which correspond to their number on the table),"

Seriously - the atomic number refers to the number of atoms in an element? Is this a Jeff Foxworthy article?
 
I hope they think up better names too. But this bit caught my eye. "Created artificially by slamming nuclei into one another in the lab, these heavyweight champs last for just tiny fractions of a second before decaying into elements we can't detect."

How do they know there are elements out there we can't detect? Maybe God just didn't like us playing him and took the new creations back to heaven. Maybe the way to heaven is to just get really slammed good. This sort of fits with my new penis Jesus theory.

Well, they would be decaying into known elements. My guess is that the residuals are simply too small to get an accurate reading. It is one atom of a superheavy that's decaying, after all. The hope was that 118 would be more stable since it should be a noble element (though that is now being questioned). Radon - right above it - has a half-life of about 4 days. Guess it was not to be.

Edit - looks like it IS slightly more stable than predicted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
Well, they would be decaying into known elements. My guess is that the residuals are simply too small to get an accurate reading. It is one atom of a superheavy that's decaying, after all. The hope was that 118 would be more stable since it should be a noble element (though that is now being questioned). Radon - right above it - has a half-life of about 4 days. Guess it was not to be.

Edit - looks like it IS slightly more stable than predicted.
So no room for magic at this lab? Penis Jesus is sad.
 
utIeVoy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
I have it on good account that one of them was this...

happy-fun-ball.jpg
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT