if you think it is in any way feasible to "store" a month's worth of water that falls in ONE DAY...Historically it has happened time and time again. California was in the midst of a decades old drought, now they have water coming from the heavens and as usual not plan in place to store it.
Sucks to be them but they weren't prepared.
if you think it is in any way feasible to "store" a month's worth of water that falls in ONE DAY...
you don't understand the most basic concepts of civil engineering or stormwater mgmt and you should probably just sit this out
Right.Wrong
Los Angeles recorded more than 4 inches (10 centimeters) of rainfall in 24 hours, nearly doubling that city's record of 2.55 inches (6.48 centimeters) set nearly a century ago in 1927, according to weather officials. The weather service said a month's worth of rainfall had deluged California in the past 24 hours.Wrong dipshit.
What's with you and posting all these youtube videos about the rain in California?
So building dams and reservoirs stops atmospheric rivers? Your delusion knows no bounds. Libs wrecked CA in more ways than one.And long before any dams/reservoirs were built.
Early historic record
Geologic evidence indicates that "megafloods" occurred in the California region in the following years A.D.: 212, 440, 603, 1029, c. 1300, 1418, 1605, and 1750.[3][4] Prior to European settlement, these early floods predominantly affected the indigenous peoples of California.
California flood of 1605
Main article: California flood of 1605
In 1605, present-day California was subject to massive flooding due to an unusually powerful atmospheric river. This was potentially the largest flooding event of the prior 2,000 years.[3][
December 1861 – January 1862: California's Great Flood
Main article: Great Flood of 1862
Beginning on December 24, 1861, and lasting for 45 days, the largest flood in California's recorded history occurred, reaching full flood stage in different areas between January 9–12, 1862. The entire Sacramentoand San Joaquin valleys were inundated for 300 miles (480 km), averaging 20 miles (32 km) in breadth. State government was forced to relocate from the capital in Sacramento for 18 months to San Francisco. The rain created an inland sea in Orange County, lasting about three weeks with water standing 4 feet (1.2 m) deep up to 4 miles (6 km) from the river.[1]
The Los Angeles basin was flooded from the San Gabriel Mountains to the Palos Verdes Peninsula, at variable depths, excluding the higher lands which became islands until the waters receded. The Los Angeles basin lost 200,000 cattle by way of drowning, as well as homes, ranches, farm crops and vineyards being swept-away.
Uh...it minimizes flooding impacts, Cletus.So building dams and reservoirs stops atmospheric rivers?
Yep. They were on the right track til they decided to try to appease the tree-hugging socialists.Historically it has happened time and time again. California was in the midst of a decades old drought, now they have water coming from the heavens and as usual not plan in place to store it.
Sucks to be them but they weren't prepared.
NopeYep.
It's amazing how people who don't know shit about our water storage are internet experts.Nope
No chance in hell of "containing" that much water.
But it won't stop you and your buddies from making dumb statements.
Same ones that post anti-vax memes and think they are immunology experts.It's amazing how people who don't know shit about our water storage are internet experts.
That was already addressed. In fact, the board's resident expert on EVERYTHING, commented with two different posts that the building of 'dams/reservoirs' 'minimizes' (not PREVENTS, but minimizes) the effects of these atmospheric rivers; a meteorological phenomenon known about for centuries. But once called out for looking like a tool he moved the goalposts (again) because that's all he's capable of.It's amazing how people who don't know shit about our water storage are internet experts.
That was already addressed. In fact, the board's resident expert on EVERYTHING, commented with two different posts that the building of 'dams/reservoirs' 'minimizes' (not PREVENTS, but minimizes) the effects of these atmospheric rivers; a meteorological phenomenon known about for centuries. But once called out for looking like a tool he moved the goalposts (again) because that's all he's capable of.
In the 1970s, coastal elites squelched California’s near-century-long commitment to building dams, reservoirs, and canals, even as the Golden State’s population ballooned. Court-ordered drainage of man-made lakes, meant to restore fish to the 1,100-square-mile Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta, partly caused central California’s reservoir water to dry up. Not content with preventing construction of new water infrastructure, environmentalists reverse-engineered existing projects to divert precious water away from agriculture, privileging the needs of fish over the needs of people. Then they alleged that global warming, not their own foolish policies, had caused the current crisis.
Even as a fourth year of drought threatens the state, canal water from the Hetch Hetchy reservoir in Yosemite National Park keeps Silicon Valley and the San Francisco Bay Area a verdant oasis. This parched coastal mountain range would have depopulated long ago without the infrastructure that an earlier, wiser generation built and that latter-day regulators and environmentalists so casually deprecated. (See “California’s Promethean Past,” Summer 2013.) Gardens and lawns remain green in Palo Alto, San Mateo, Cupertino, and San Francisco, where residents continue to benefit from past investments in huge water transfers from inland mountains to the coast. They will be the last to go dry.
That was already addressed. In fact, the board's resident expert on EVERYTHING, commented with two different posts that the building of 'dams/reservoirs' 'minimizes' (not PREVENTS, but minimizes)
ExactlyMost are set up for weather like this to mitigate flooding.
They're typically set up to mitigate 100 and even 500 year floods, but certainly not a 1000 year event. And not multiple events back to back.Exactly
They can mitigate a 5- or 10-yr flooding event.
Not a 100- or 1000-year flooding event.
Cletus is too dumb to understand that point.
Much like what happened with the Coralville Reservoir in '93 and again in the early 2000s.They're typically set up to mitigate 100 and even 500 year floods, but certainly not a 1000 year event. And not multiple events back to back.
Much like what happened with the Coralville Reservoir in '93 and again in the early 2000s.
Call me a bastard, but I'm letting that dude drown
Damn! That man-made global climate change is something else, huh? At least it was a hundred sixty years ago.
The intense rains sweeping in from the Pacific Ocean began to pound central California on Christmas Eve in 1861 and continued virtually unabated for 43 days. The deluges quickly transformed rivers running down from the Sierra Nevada mountains along the state’s eastern border into raging torrents that swept away
entire communities and mining settlements. The rivers and rains poured into the state’s vast Central Valley, turning it into an inland sea 300 miles long and 20 miles wide. Thousands of people died, and one quarter of the state’s estimated 800,000 cattle drowned. Downtown Sacramento was submerged under 10 feet of brown water filled with debris from countless mud-slides on the region’s steep slopes. California’s legislature, unable to function, moved to San Francisco until Sacramento dried out—six months later. By then, the state was bankrupt.
Imagine if there were a bunch of dams in SoCal that could capture this water7 minutes of highlights from Reed Timmer posted yesterday
Category 5 atmospheric river event causes life-threatening flash flooding in Southern California
I just like saying “rancho cucamonga”