ADVERTISEMENT

Pioneer, Monsanto drop pledges to create 350 Iowa jobs

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,446
62,565
113
Farm powerhouses DuPont Pioneer and Monsanto Co. are seeking to pull out of agreements with the state that would require them to create about 350 jobs.

Citing the downturn in the farm economy, the companies will forgo nearly $21 million in state tax incentives to avoid the job-creation goals.

St. Louis-based Monsanto said it will not to pursue a $90 million corn plant in Independence, a project that would have brought about 50 jobs to the northeast Iowa town.

Johnston-based Pioneer said it has built or is building three projects, with a $139 million capital investment. But it's uncertain it can meet the 305 job-creation requirements tied to the projects to receive about $13 million in state tax credits.

On Friday, Wilmington, Del.-based DuPont, the parent of Pioneer, said it would merge with Midland, Mich.-based Dow Chemical in a deal now valued around $115 billion.

The combined company plans to spin off three new businesses, including one that would combine Pioneer and Dow AgroSciences.

Additionally, DuPont announced Friday a $700 million cost-cutting and restructuring plan that would result in cutting about 5,400 members of the company's 54,000 global workforce.

DuPont declined to say how many cuts will take place in Iowa. Pioneer employs an estimated 3,400 Iowans, mostly in the Des Moines metro area. Many of the jobs are high-paying research and scientific positions.

"At this point in time, we're not sure how the merger will affect the local Pioneer presence in Johnston," said Jim Sanders, Johnston's city administrator. "We have talked with leaders, and they're not sure how it will affect local operations either."

Analysts have speculated that consolidation is inevitable in the agriculture industry as seed and chemical companies struggle with shrinking profits.

U.S. farm income is projected to decline 38 percent this year as growers are squeezed by low corn and soybean prices and high costs for seeds, fertilizer and other inputs.

Farm income in Iowa declined 39 percent last year to nearly $5.1 billion, data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture showed.

Chad Hart, an Iowa State University agricultural economist, said the industry is "under some significant financial pressure, just as crop farmers are."

“It’s not just Pioneer. It’s not just Monsanto. When we look across the board at Deere, Kinze — we’ve seen if you’re an ag input supplier, you’re tightening your belt right now just like farmers are," Hart said. "It’s not one company in particular. It’s the sector as a whole that’s making these moves."

Johnston Mayor Paula Dierenfeld expects Pioneer, founded in Johnston in 1926 by agricultural pioneer Henry A. Wallace, will remain a strong part of the community.

"Pioneer has very deep and strong roots in the Johnston community," she said. "They've gone through changes before. They've gone through difficult times before. It's a very resilient company."

Pioneer became a part of DuPont in 1999.

Dierenfeld expects whatever new company emerges from the DuPont-Dow combination will find Pioneer a significant asset.

"They're high-quality workers. They're smart and they work hard, and I think the new company will see the real value and the asset they have there," she said.

The Iowa Economic Development Authority board will consider requests from Pioneer and Monsanto to withdraw from their state contracts at a meeting Friday.

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/st...o-drop-pledges-create-350-iowa-jobs/77500518/
 
Farm powerhouses DuPont Pioneer and Monsanto Co. are seeking to pull out of agreements with the state that would require them to create about 350 jobs.

Citing the downturn in the farm economy, the companies will forgo nearly $21 million in state tax incentives to avoid the job-creation goals.

St. Louis-based Monsanto said it will not to pursue a $90 million corn plant in Independence, a project that would have brought about 50 jobs to the northeast Iowa town.

Johnston-based Pioneer said it has built or is building three projects, with a $139 million capital investment. But it's uncertain it can meet the 305 job-creation requirements tied to the projects to receive about $13 million in state tax credits.

On Friday, Wilmington, Del.-based DuPont, the parent of Pioneer, said it would merge with Midland, Mich.-based Dow Chemical in a deal now valued around $115 billion.

The combined company plans to spin off three new businesses, including one that would combine Pioneer and Dow AgroSciences.

Additionally, DuPont announced Friday a $700 million cost-cutting and restructuring plan that would result in cutting about 5,400 members of the company's 54,000 global workforce.

DuPont declined to say how many cuts will take place in Iowa. Pioneer employs an estimated 3,400 Iowans, mostly in the Des Moines metro area. Many of the jobs are high-paying research and scientific positions.

"At this point in time, we're not sure how the merger will affect the local Pioneer presence in Johnston," said Jim Sanders, Johnston's city administrator. "We have talked with leaders, and they're not sure how it will affect local operations either."

Analysts have speculated that consolidation is inevitable in the agriculture industry as seed and chemical companies struggle with shrinking profits.

U.S. farm income is projected to decline 38 percent this year as growers are squeezed by low corn and soybean prices and high costs for seeds, fertilizer and other inputs.

Farm income in Iowa declined 39 percent last year to nearly $5.1 billion, data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture showed.

Chad Hart, an Iowa State University agricultural economist, said the industry is "under some significant financial pressure, just as crop farmers are."

“It’s not just Pioneer. It’s not just Monsanto. When we look across the board at Deere, Kinze — we’ve seen if you’re an ag input supplier, you’re tightening your belt right now just like farmers are," Hart said. "It’s not one company in particular. It’s the sector as a whole that’s making these moves."

Johnston Mayor Paula Dierenfeld expects Pioneer, founded in Johnston in 1926 by agricultural pioneer Henry A. Wallace, will remain a strong part of the community.

"Pioneer has very deep and strong roots in the Johnston community," she said. "They've gone through changes before. They've gone through difficult times before. It's a very resilient company."

Pioneer became a part of DuPont in 1999.

Dierenfeld expects whatever new company emerges from the DuPont-Dow combination will find Pioneer a significant asset.

"They're high-quality workers. They're smart and they work hard, and I think the new company will see the real value and the asset they have there," she said.

The Iowa Economic Development Authority board will consider requests from Pioneer and Monsanto to withdraw from their state contracts at a meeting Friday.

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/st...o-drop-pledges-create-350-iowa-jobs/77500518/

So blame the obama economy? All you libs are telling us how booming the obama economy is, was that all a lie?
 
Monsanto just took huge losses last year and are laying off 2600 employees. They also have over 700 lawsuits pending against them.

I'm sure that the new research on pesticides, and the WHO's announcement on glyphosate is not helping their cause.
Nope. Monsanto earned $2.7B for the year ending 8/31.
 
Nope. Monsanto earned $2.7B for the year ending 8/31.

You don't consider the 4th quarter losses of $495 million as significant? Shutting down R&D centers and closing down sugar cane operations in Brazil, while laying off 2600 people are not signs of things going well. I'm not saying they are going out of business, but there is a huge amount of growing backlash against Monsanto from the public and scientific communities.
Not to mention that they bailed on their attempt to purchase Syngenta, and investors were not happy about the 3 billion that is going to be spent "restructuring" the company.
 
You don't consider the 4th quarter losses of $495 million as significant? Shutting down R&D centers and closing down sugar cane operations in Brazil, while laying off 2600 people are not signs of things going well. I'm not saying they are going out of business, but there is a huge amount of growing backlash against Monsanto from the public and scientific communities.
Not to mention that they bailed on their attempt to purchase Syngenta, and investors were not happy about the 3 billion that is going to be spent "restructuring" the company.
They lose money in that quarter every year and make money in the other 3.

The ag conpanies want to consolidate to reduce competition and cut jobs. Pretty simple.
 
The fact that their first patent for roundup ready soybeans ended in 2015 have anything to do with their financial issues?

Doesn't that mean others can use it now which would result in lower prices?
 
Caterpillar, Inc. in early February of 2015 announced that
they were expanding their headquarters in Peoria, Illinois.
In October they announced that they were removing 3,700
jobs from their workforce. Most of them were white collars
workers in Illinois. The expansion of their headquarters
has been put on hold.

Bottom Line: The economy has never recovered from the
2008 downturn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawk in SEC Country
The fact that their first patent for roundup ready soybeans ended in 2015 have anything to do with their financial issues?

Doesn't that mean others can use it now which would result in lower prices?

As has been said already, the entire ag industry is hurting. It's part of a typical 5 year cycle. Corn prices are predicted to start increasing next year (if only modestly) and the consolidations/mergers are likely to continue.
 
So it begins.



DuPont will eliminate about 1,700 jobs in Delaware by early 2016.

CEO Ed Breen announced the layoffs in a memo sent to DuPont's roughly 6,100 Delaware employees Tuesday.

Most of the job cuts are expected to be completed before the chemical giant's proposed merger with Dow Chemical, headquartered in Midland. All 1,700 workers are expected to be let go by the end of March.
 
Caterpillar, Inc. in early February of 2015 announced that
they were expanding their headquarters in Peoria, Illinois.
In October they announced that they were removing 3,700
jobs from their workforce. Most of them were white collars
workers in Illinois. The expansion of their headquarters
has been put on hold.

Bottom Line: The economy has never recovered from the
2008 downturn.
Lol, hyperbole much?
 
Farm powerhouses DuPont Pioneer and Monsanto Co. are seeking to pull out of agreements with the state that would require them to create about 350 jobs.

Citing the downturn in the farm economy, the companies will forgo nearly $21 million in state tax incentives to avoid the job-creation goals.

St. Louis-based Monsanto said it will not to pursue a $90 million corn plant in Independence, a project that would have brought about 50 jobs to the northeast Iowa town.

Johnston-based Pioneer said it has built or is building three projects, with a $139 million capital investment. But it's uncertain it can meet the 305 job-creation requirements tied to the projects to receive about $13 million in state tax credits.

On Friday, Wilmington, Del.-based DuPont, the parent of Pioneer, said it would merge with Midland, Mich.-based Dow Chemical in a deal now valued around $115 billion.

The combined company plans to spin off three new businesses, including one that would combine Pioneer and Dow AgroSciences.

Additionally, DuPont announced Friday a $700 million cost-cutting and restructuring plan that would result in cutting about 5,400 members of the company's 54,000 global workforce.

DuPont declined to say how many cuts will take place in Iowa. Pioneer employs an estimated 3,400 Iowans, mostly in the Des Moines metro area. Many of the jobs are high-paying research and scientific positions.

"At this point in time, we're not sure how the merger will affect the local Pioneer presence in Johnston," said Jim Sanders, Johnston's city administrator. "We have talked with leaders, and they're not sure how it will affect local operations either."

Analysts have speculated that consolidation is inevitable in the agriculture industry as seed and chemical companies struggle with shrinking profits.

U.S. farm income is projected to decline 38 percent this year as growers are squeezed by low corn and soybean prices and high costs for seeds, fertilizer and other inputs.

Farm income in Iowa declined 39 percent last year to nearly $5.1 billion, data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture showed.

Chad Hart, an Iowa State University agricultural economist, said the industry is "under some significant financial pressure, just as crop farmers are."

“It’s not just Pioneer. It’s not just Monsanto. When we look across the board at Deere, Kinze — we’ve seen if you’re an ag input supplier, you’re tightening your belt right now just like farmers are," Hart said. "It’s not one company in particular. It’s the sector as a whole that’s making these moves."

Johnston Mayor Paula Dierenfeld expects Pioneer, founded in Johnston in 1926 by agricultural pioneer Henry A. Wallace, will remain a strong part of the community.

"Pioneer has very deep and strong roots in the Johnston community," she said. "They've gone through changes before. They've gone through difficult times before. It's a very resilient company."

Pioneer became a part of DuPont in 1999.

Dierenfeld expects whatever new company emerges from the DuPont-Dow combination will find Pioneer a significant asset.

"They're high-quality workers. They're smart and they work hard, and I think the new company will see the real value and the asset they have there," she said.

The Iowa Economic Development Authority board will consider requests from Pioneer and Monsanto to withdraw from their state contracts at a meeting Friday.

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/st...o-drop-pledges-create-350-iowa-jobs/77500518/
Maybe they're counting on not having 350 employees available after the food supply becomes 100% lethal.

Cuz', you know, they'll all be dead.

:(
 
Sorry, but between watching the Hawks beat MSU and googling 'derp' I haven't had the time to respond.

Keep guzzlin' your Roundup. With the keen intellect you've demonstrated by tossing one insulting word at me, it obviously hasn't affected your ability to think critically (personally, in your shoes, I would probably have gone with 'f#%king derp' - but that's just me). I really have no response to such a well thought out counterattack.

It must be time for bed. :D
 
Sorry, but between watching the Hawks beat MSU and googling 'derp' I haven't had the time to respond.

Keep guzzlin' your Roundup. With the keen intellect you've demonstrated by tossing one insulting word at me, it obviously hasn't affected your ability to think critically (personally, in your shoes, I would probably have gone with 'f#%king derp' - but that's just me). I really have no response to such a well thought out counterattack.

It must be time for bed. :D

I'm sorry. I assumed your ridiculous post meant you expected equally ridiculous responses. I think you're just jealous I was able to pull mine off with one word.
Go Hawks.
 
You don't consider the 4th quarter losses of $495 million as significant? Shutting down R&D centers and closing down sugar cane operations in Brazil, while laying off 2600 people are not signs of things going well. I'm not saying they are going out of business, but there is a huge amount of growing backlash against Monsanto from the public and scientific communities.
Not to mention that they bailed on their attempt to purchase Syngenta, and investors were not happy about the 3 billion that is going to be spent "restructuring" the company.
Support from the real scientific community has never been stronger for biotech and Monsanto. Any negative effects are due to the downturn in the Ag economy. Monsanto is still the best positioned company of any of the major players. Layoffs and cost cutting are just preparations to look more attractive to investors and Wall Street. Look for the Syngenta/Monsanto merger to still happen in early 2016. The Dow/Dupont merger was the first of many dominoes to fall in the industry.
 
Support from the real scientific community has never been stronger for biotech and Monsanto. Any negative effects are due to the downturn in the Ag economy. Monsanto is still the best positioned company of any of the major players. Layoffs and cost cutting are just preparations to look more attractive to investors and Wall Street. Look for the Syngenta/Monsanto merger to still happen in early 2016. The Dow/Dupont merger was the first of many dominoes to fall in the industry.

And in other news, support from johns has never been stronger for prostitution. :D:D:D:D

Monsanto invents their own science; researchers can either choose to ride the gravy train or just GTFO.
Then, out of the blue, in May 2013, six months after the Seralini study release, Elsevier announced that it had created a new position, ‘Associate Editor for Biotechnology’. The person they hired to fill it was Richard E. Goodman, a former Monsanto employee who in addition was with the Monsanto pro-GMO lobby organization, the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) which develops industry-friendly risk assessment methods for GM foods and chemical food contaminants and inserts them into government regulations.

As one critical scientific website posed the obvious ethical sham of hiring Monsanto people to control GMO publications, “Does Monsanto now effectively decide which papers on biotechnology are published in FCT? And is this part of an attempt by Monsanto and the life science industry to seize control of science?”

Then on November 24, 2013, six months after Goodman took control of GMO issues at the Journal, Dr. A. Wallace Hayes, the editor of the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology reportedly decided to retract the study by the team of Professor Séralini.

The reasons for the extraordinary retraction a full year after publishing are in violation of the guidelines for retractions in scientific publishing set out by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), of which FCT is a member. According to the guidelines, the only grounds for a journal to retract a paper are:

• Clear evidence that the findings are unreliable due to misconduct (e.g. data fabrication) or honest error;

• Plagiarism or redundant publication;

• Unethical research.

Séralini’s paper meets none of these criteria and Hayes admits as much. In his letter informing the professor of his decision, Hayes concedes that examination of Séralini’s raw data showed no evidence of fraud or intentional misrepresentation of the data.

As Claire Robinson of GM Watch points out, "inconclusiveness of findings is not a valid ground for retraction. Numerous published scientific papers contain inconclusive findings, which are often mixed in with findings that can be presented with more certainty. It is for future researchers to build on the findings and refine scientific understanding of any uncertainties.”

Elsevier, the publisher of the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology, is one of the giants in worldwide scientific publications. And they are apparently not so rigorous when it comes to making money over scientific principle.

In 2009, Elsevier invented an entire medical journal, complete with editorial board, in order to publish papers promoting the products of the pharmaceutical manufacturer Merck. Merck provided the papers, Elsevier published them, and doctors read them, unaware that the ‘Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine’ was simply a PR vehicle for the drug giant
https://www.rt.com/op-edge/monsanto-gmo-studies-reports-588/
 
Does this not allow Terry Braindead to back track on his promise of all these jobs he and Kimmy are creating?

Agriculture has ALWAYS been cyclical. The industry that is famous for subsidies and govt. handouts will survive but the downturn will likely be a good 2-3 years before we see an upswing.
 
Absolutely no one credible takes the Seralini study seriously. Take off the foil hat.
 
Why.......he used the same conditions and the same breed of rats. But instead of running the study for 90 days, he ran it for 2 years.

Then he didn't use the same conditions, did he? Those rats have been bred to develop cancer for the purpose of studying cancer. In other words, he kept the rats alive for the sake of a scare tactic photo. One that's duped most of the scientifically illiterate population of the planet.
And, when he finally released all of the data he withheld in the original pupils he's study (one of the reasons for the original retraction, not some ridiculous conspiracy theory), the rats fed roundup actually lived longer than the ones that weren't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IO-wuh
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT