I wish they had shut it down. The INT that completely changed the momentum was in the 2nd half.Playoff teams play to win. They don't play to not lose. KF shut it down at halftime.
First loss since 2018 when having led by 10
I wish they had shut it down. The INT that completely changed the momentum was in the 2nd half.Playoff teams play to win. They don't play to not lose. KF shut it down at halftime.
Lol, tell me more about all of those famous KF "correctables" most of which never seem to get corrected.You don't lose because of one play. But many would say Iowa did lose by getting beat deep.
It was a complete lack of discipline. Something you pretty much never see from an Iowa defender. Something completely correctable. And people are freaking out like Iowa isn't any good, smh
See above postLol, tell me more about all of those famous KF "correctables" most of which never seem to get corrected.
We lost because our HC, per usual, coached scared and tried running out the clock at the start of the 2nd half with a 13-point lead.
You're probably right. I'm holding out hope still. I think we've relied on our defense too long and the law of averages means we are due for some let downs.If other things fall into place. We might need this team to beat that team and so on. The chances of that are no better then just winning all our conference games. After all that is all we can control. AND until proven wrong, I am going to say that with the addition of 3 weeks of practice before we go to Columbus, we have a shot. Unless our defense just is not as good as I think it is, they will keep us in every game.
Might want to check your "facts."First loss since 2018 when having led by 10
I just want a head coach that puts his throat on the other team when given the chance and end them so they have no chance. Iowa had that the entire first half and KF’s conservative style of play prevented that from happening and gave ISU every chance to stick around. So tired of KF’s margin for error being so thin with regards to the outcome when it shouldn’t come into question. Iowa should have been up 21-0 to 28-0 at half on Saturday. It’s time for change when you see what is happening at Missouri and the offensive juggernaut they have become under their coach. Play to win on both sides of the ball.HELL will freeze over before THIS team beats Ohio State.
The Offense is still way inadequate against a team with a pulse.
The Capt must go.
This post exemplifies your simple minded approach.And I'm not sure how offensive performance relates to a conversation about the playoffs.
For the past several years KF has forced our D to play a near perfect game just to ensure low-scoring, very close wins against sh*tty opponents. If the D takes even a slight step back, which this D looks poised to take, KF is in serious trouble.You're probably right. I'm holding out hope still. I think we've relied on our defense too long and the law of averages means we are due for some let downs.
You have to remember this is the same guy that “is not convinced a better offense leads to more wins” (his words) and that a better offense could adversely affect the performance of the defense.This post exemplifies your simple minded approach.
In football, you must score more points than your opponent in order to win.
Offensive performance strongly correlates to scoring points.
Good offensive performance tends to result in more points and, therefore, greater probability of winning.
Greater probabilities of winning are preferred over lesser probabilities of winning because a team’s winning record is the predominate determining factor for qualifying for the playoffs.
Therefore, offensive performance fundamentally relates to any conversation about making the playoffs.
To be confused about how offensive performance relates to playoff possibilities demonstrates ignorance. Get a clue.
The Capt must retire.I just want a head coach that puts his throat on the other team when given the chance and end them so they have no chance. Iowa had that the entire first half and KF’s conservative style of play prevented that from happening and gave ISU every chance to stick around. So tired of KF’s margin for error being so thin with regards to the outcome when it shouldn’t come into question. Iowa should have been up 21-0 to 28-0 at half on Saturday. It’s time for change when you see what is happening at Missouri and the offensive juggernaut they have become under their coach. Play to win on both sides of the ball.
I thought the defense seemed confused out there, a lot of shuffling right before the snap and people out of position (Xavier on the deep TD). Not typical of a PP defense.You're probably right. I'm holding out hope still. I think we've relied on our defense too long and the law of averages means we are due for some let downs.
Looking back on the game I think ISU ‘Out-Iowa’d’ IowaI thought the defense seemed confused out there, a lot of shuffling right before the snap and people out of position (Xavier on the deep TD). Not typical of a PP defense.
Cade = <Scoring touchdowns instead of field goals isn't style points. Style points aren't necessary. Points are necessary, as proven by Saturday's game. Our offensive production directly correlates with our chances to get to the playoffs. We must show the committee that we are a good team, and beating other teams soundly is the only way of doing that.
Most of what you say is true.This post exemplifies your simple minded approach.
In football, you must score more points than your opponent in order to win.
Offensive performance strongly correlates to scoring points.
Good offensive performance tends to result in more points and, therefore, greater probability of winning.
Greater probabilities of winning are preferred over lesser probabilities of winning because a team’s winning record is the predominate determining factor for qualifying for the playoffs.
Therefore, offensive performance fundamentally relates to any conversation about making the playoffs.
To be confused about how offensive performance relates to playoff possibilities demonstrates ignorance or an inability to apply logic. Get a clue.
I never stated that. You have me confused with another poster. Try to stay focused.You initially said, "I like how you've not yet addressed the offensive performance yesterday." No shit Sherlock. Maybe because I started a thread about something else
Ah yes, it was 2D.I never stated that. You have me confused with another poster. Try to stay focused.
You are correct.Might want to check your "facts."
Nebraska’s playoff chances are no better than Iowas.10-2 puts the Hawks in the running...might not be enough, depends on how everyone else shakes out.
Personally I think the ceiling is 9-3 and out at this point. We'll lose a game we aren't supposed to...
Hopefully that includes wrecking Nebraska's playoff chances . Silver lining...
Looking at their schedule they have a good shot at 9-2 going into Black Friday.Nebraska’s playoff chances are no better than Iowas.
Iowa lost a double digit halftime lead in 2014 to a ISU team that failed to win a Big 12 game. Pathetic. Turtle mode that year also in second half.You are correct.
Thought I heard that stat on the broadcast. Maybe I misheard it.
Regardless, it's been since 2014 since Iowa has lost when having led by 10 in the 2nd half
#1 Time for a cool changeHELL will freeze over before THIS team beats Ohio State.
The Offense is still way inadequate against a team with a pulse.
The Capt must go.
Nebraska’s playoff chances are no better than Iowas.
Really, it's time for the Big10 to do away with the title game. It could end up cannibalizing its playoff hopefuls.
Respond to what?
And I'm not sure how offensive performance relates to a conversation about the playoffs.
Indeed. Delete this thread. Not a chance in hell.Playoffs? I am wondering if 7-5 is even possible.