Poll: Does Robert Hur deserve an apology?

[hawkeyetraveler]

Just think if D's had taken the report seriously and started the Biden discussion in February instead of attacking him. Might have ended up with a good candidate instead of Harris.

Maybe D's join R's in demanding the interview audio be released....might have had the debate "moment" in Feb.

No argument here. I continue to believe Biden slow played his withdrawal to ensure Kamala was the only viable choice. IMO the Dems have a fairly deep bench with better choices than Kamala.

Having said that I’m still enormously relieved to vote for her instead of Trump or Biden.

 

[St. Louis Hawk]

You mean like Garland did appointing Smith as Special Counsel without Senate approval?

No, I don’t mean that at all.

But good luck with that appeal …

 

[Sharky1203]

No, I don’t mean that at all.

But good luck with that appeal …

It'll be Upheld. He violated the constitution.

 

[Scruddy]

☝️

 

[St. Louis Hawk]

It'll be Upheld. He violated the constitution.

 

[hawkeyetraveler]

View embedded media

☝️

If you are going to show a bar chart you should also show your source data. You wouldn’t want to be accused of, you know, spreading misinformation around after all.

Not that you of all people would ever be guilty of that of course.

 

[Sharky1203]

View embedded media

Crap that's right, sorry I forgot, the Constitution sucks and needs to be changed to fit a political ideology.

 

[Scruddy]

If you are going to show a bar chart you should also show your source data. You wouldn’t want to be accused of, you know, spreading misinformation around after all.

Not that you of all people would ever be guilty of that of course.

Weren't you one of the people who said joe biden was sharp?

 

[Greenway4Prez]

The left doesn't lie constantly? I muse have imagined Russia collusion, Russian bounties, fine people, joe biden isn't retarded, etc.

It’s too exhaustive a list. And they don’t stop repeating them even when shown the truth.

 

[St. Louis Hawk]

Crap that's right, sorry I forgot, the Constitution sucks and needs to be changed to fit a political ideology.

Feel free to point out the text of the Constitution that requires a special prosecutor be Senate confirmed.

 

[Sharky1203]

Feel free to point out the text of the Constitution that requires a special prosecutor be Senate confirmed.

§ 600.9 Notification and reports by the Attorney General.​

(a) The Attorney General will notify the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the Judiciary Committees of each House of Congress, with an explanation for each action—
(1) Upon appointing a Special Counsel;
(2) Upon removing any Special Counsel; and
(3) Upon conclusion of the Special Counsels investigation, including, to the extent consistent with applicable law, a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued.

(b) The notification requirement in paragraph (a)(1) of this section may be tolled by the Attorney General upon a finding that legitimate investigative or privacy concerns require confidentiality. At such time as confidentiality is no longer needed, the notification will be provided.

(c) The Attorney General may determine that public release of these reports would be in the public interest, to the extent that release would comply with applicable legal restrictions. All other releases of information by any Department of Justice employee, including the Special Counsel and staff, concerning matters handled by Special Counsels shall be governed by the generally applicable Departmental guidelines concerning public comment with respect to any criminal investigation, and relevant law

 

[St. Louis Hawk]

§ 600.9 Notification and reports by the Attorney General.​

(a) The Attorney General will notify the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the Judiciary Committees of each House of Congress, with an explanation for each action—
(1) Upon appointing a Special Counsel;
(2) Upon removing any Special Counsel; and
(3) Upon conclusion of the Special Counsels investigation, including, to the extent consistent with applicable law, a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued.

(b) The notification requirement in paragraph (a)(1) of this section may be tolled by the Attorney General upon a finding that legitimate investigative or privacy concerns require confidentiality. At such time as confidentiality is no longer needed, the notification will be provided.

(c) The Attorney General may determine that public release of these reports would be in the public interest, to the extent that release would comply with applicable legal restrictions. All other releases of information by any Department of Justice employee, including the Special Counsel and staff, concerning matters handled by Special Counsels shall be governed by the generally applicable Departmental guidelines concerning public comment with respect to any criminal investigation, and relevant law

Missed that section of the Constitution. Is that in one of the amendments? Or perhaps tucked somewhere in Article III.

 

[hawkeyetraveler]

Weren't you one of the people who said joe biden was sharp?

Nope go look it up. I was in the very early group saying he was too old. Hell, I was saying that in 2020. Now do I prefer him to Trump? Yes. Do I think he can finish the term? Yes. But then he needs to go sit quietly in a beach somewhere and let others take the reigns.