That sounds right. I did a little googling and found this in an AP article:Pelosi was stating that she would not take a vaccine where Trump bypassed testing processes to rush it to market (overruling FDA oversight).
Which would have been a smart bet had that happened.
Should they attack Trump’s vaccine claims too aggressively, Democrats risk further undermining public confidence in a possible lifesaving medicine while looking as though they are rooting against a potential cure. But if they don’t push back, it makes it easier for Trump to use the real or imagined prospect of a vaccine to boost his reelection campaign.
Washington Gov. Jay Inslee demonstrated the Democrats’ balancing act on Friday when asked whether he would be willing to take a vaccine released by the administration before the election.
“If all the protocols had been followed and the evidence is in, of course, I’d follow science. It doesn’t matter when it happens,” Inslee told The Associated Press. “But I would have to look at the science, not Donald Trump. There isn’t one single thing I would ever trust from Donald Trump to be true.”
Note the Dems are credited with not wanting to undermine confidence in good medical practices. That's something totally absent from the Rs' attacks on science and vaccines.
[Disclaimer: I made a token donation to Inslee's campaign in 2020.]
Democrats face quandary on vaccine support as election nears
NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump is escalating his promise for a coronavirus vaccine before Election Day.
apnews.com