A lot of folks here lament going off the gold standard. A lot here also lament the creation of the Federal Reserve. There's some overlap, but some begrudge one more than the other, or one and not the other. Where do you stand?
Can we get the benefit without handing that much power to private banks?Getting rid of both the Fed and the gold standard would be disastrous to our economy. Before the Fed, recessions typically lost at least 20-30%. After the Fed, those losses average less than 5%. It is indisputable that recessions have been better under the Fed. Way better.
Getting rid of both the Fed and the gold standard would be disastrous to our economy. Before the Fed, recessions typically lost at least 20-30%. After the Fed, those losses average less than 5%. It is indisputable that recessions have been better under the Fed. Way better.
You're one dangerous man.Getting rid of both the Fed and the gold standard would be disastrous to our economy. Before the Fed, recessions typically lost at least 20-30%. After the Fed, those losses average less than 5%. It is indisputable that recessions have been better under the Fed. Way better.
The 20 to 30 percent losses usually lasted for a year or less. Now the percentages are fraudulent, but about the same and they last for a decade.Getting rid of both the Fed and the gold standard would be disastrous to our economy. Before the Fed, recessions typically lost at least 20-30%. After the Fed, those losses average less than 5%. It is indisputable that recessions have been better under the Fed. Way better.
Also, it doesn't have to be a gold standard. Other things can be used. Hitler used real estate to borrow against to turn the German economy around and it proved to be effective. Not all nazi tactics were bad. Lol