I dont like thisGrip, I hate to be the one to tell you this but the answer is none of them. And worse, you will see a B1G school drop wrestling in the next 5 years. Probably multiple.
I dont like thisGrip, I hate to be the one to tell you this but the answer is none of them. And worse, you will see a B1G school drop wrestling in the next 5 years. Probably multiple.
correct.No idea what the University’s official reason was, I was only saying that it wasn’t money the reason for dropping wrestling.
Common sense tells me that they couldn’t ADD baseball without cutting something.
Wrestling was sacrificed in order to allow for baseball to be added, or the would have been outside of Title IX compliance.
Oregon has all the money in the world….
WRESTLING in general, is NOT bringing in fans and or generating interest PERIOD!!! Wade Schalles is constantly talking about this and at least trying to come up with ideas to help the sport.
Outside of IOWA which brings in 15K+ to home meets, there is not much else. Right now you have F*** st with there POS bandwagon fans doing OK because they are winning. Once knocked off that high purch, they won't be able to draw flies again!!!
It is really sad to see some very good programs in some large universities who can't even fill a small gym!!! The POS ncaa with their brainless NIL decision will most likely destroy wrestling and many other sports that have the same problem!!!
It gives the horses asses in charge a perfect reason to start cutting programs!
UHHHH, I believe you are having a debate with yourself!?!?!? 1) NOT blaming the athletes 2) did NOT already exist till very recently!!! 3) POS title IX IS a perfect example of what I am talking about!!!! 4) RE-read what I wrote- it gives the POS people in-charge yet another reason!!!NIL is not the problem. Stop blaming the athletes for a system that already existed. it's no different than blaming Title IX for the loss of wrestling programs. Its about the greed of the ADs/board of trustees of the institution.
Look at a school like Stanford. They were going to cut sports, for what? Literally shitz and giggles and to hold their alumni hostage. (I think they knew damn well the funds would get raised)
🙄correct.
all the money in the world.
they didn't have to drop wrestling to add baseball.
they could have added a women's sport. i'm sorry but your excuse is bs.
you're back to money being an issue after saying money was not an issue.Of course they could have added a women’s sport but everyone knows that would take away from football funds.
But, money is ALWAYS an issue. In fact, it is the FUNDAMENTAL issue and always will be. Telling people they have to give more of it away and not expect them to adjust accordingly is simply living in Fantasy Land....you're back to money being an issue after saying money was not an issue.
WRESTLING in general, is NOT bringing in fans and or generating interest PERIOD!!! Wade Schalles is constantly talking about this and at least trying to come up with ideas to help the sport.
Outside of IOWA which brings in 15K+ to home meets, there is not much else. Right now you have F*** st with there POS bandwagon fans doing OK because they are winning. Once knocked off that high purch, they won't be able to draw flies again!!!
It is really sad to see some very good programs in some large universities who can't even fill a small gym!!! The POS ncaa with their brainless NIL decision will most likely destroy wrestling and many other sports that have the same problem!!!
It gives the horses asses in charge a perfect reason to start cutting programs!
IF there is lack of interest in a sport, you have very few fans, it costs the skool $$$$, you can't even put a remotely competitive team out etc
I dont like this
did ironbird steal your password? and did you read the entire conversation?But, money is ALWAYS an issue. In fact, it is the FUNDAMENTAL issue and always will be. Telling people they have to give more of it away and not expect them to adjust accordingly is simply living in Fantasy Land....
I did. I wasn't really arguing either of those points. I was actually trying to make the entire argument simple. It truly revolves around money and who and how certain groups are trying to force them to spend it.did ironbird steal your password? and did you read the entire conversation?
I don’t think I said money was the issue! 😂you're back to money being an issue after saying money was not an issue.
how many dollars per word does Hawkeye Beacon pay you?I did. I wasn't really arguing either of those points. I was actually trying to make the entire argument simple. It truly revolves around money and who and how certain groups are trying to force them to spend it.
Right or wrong, you don't tell a person, business or organization they are making too much money(even going as far as to say they are wrong in how they make it) and then expect them to form a plan that makes them less. If forced, they are going to find ways to offset those costs and those ways usually aren't good for those below/beholden to them...
I have been trying to figure out ways for MANY years??? I would say QUAD meets/ dual meet tournaments might be a good starts? IOWA would not need this, but lets say Maryland, Michigan state etc..... Bring in a team or TWOOOO, THREEEE and make it an event.Ok. So what exactly to you have in mind to turn things around?
I've been meaning to attend a Morgan State Bears dual. Maybe I will buy season tickets next year and attend when I can (assuming they sell season tickets).
^^^^ THIS is my point!!!! NO one cares because the sports SUCK(sorry if the truth hurts!?!?!?) The Olympics has become a SORRY ASS JOKE and once again goes back to LEADERSHIP!!!There are plenty of competitive teams in Olympic sports that have little to no attendance.
Take field hockey for example. I attended some at American and Lehigh when my niece played for Colgate. Way more than 83% of those in attendance are friends and family.
Have you even seen the size of their fields' bleachers. Not much more seating than when I played Little League baseball in 1975.
There was MUCH MORE diversity back in the day. LOOK at the championship photos, so many different skools could have a champion! With NIL, it appears that fewer and fewer will be able to 1) recruit a stud and 2) get to keep him!!!!Only two schools having a realistic shot at the title for almost two decades doesn't help. I hate to say this, because I hate the organization, but more UFC involvement (with emphasis on individual match-ups) and promotion would be the way. Problem is that most UFC fans aren't really affiliated with institutions of higher learning, like colleges, or learning the intricacies of any sport that isn't obvious.
IF anyone is stealing something, it is those trying to steal from SIR IRON!!! REMEMBER THAT!!!!did ironbird steal your password? and did you read the entire conversation?
I would never charge to help educate those in need!how many dollars per word does Hawkeye Beacon pay you?
People love to make the NCAA this malevolent and powerful entity that imposes its will on institutions and athletes but the reality (as you point out) is that it does what the institutions want it to do and what the courts tell it it must do. It is, in fact, a non-profit organization and has extremely limited ability to enforce its own rules.The NCAA is controlled by the member institutions. It isn't like the NCAA keeps the basketball TV money. It largely gets distributed to the member schools.
Major college conference greed centered around the cash cows of their football and men's basketball programs is fueling most of the changes going in today, including revenue sharing. That's the issue at hand, not NIL. Revenue sharing/giving the players a bigger cut was inevitable, and that's the current problem for athletic departments today. It is worse for those schools outside the B1G and SEC.
I would say QUAD meets/ dual meet tournaments might be a good starts?
Look, these sports exist because of POS title IX!!!! Now do NOT get me wrong!!! I am ALL for girls having their OWN sports!!!
Would need a MAJOR team or TWOOOO! In the cases of teams such as these. Maybe a team like NAVY brings in a couple of local HS powerhouses to battle it out.Morgan State's wrestling team has participated in quad meets, including the Navy Quad Meet and the Morgan State Legacy Meet.
Impact seemed negligible.
AHHH you are WAY OFF!!! Has nothing to do with me being against any sport!!! What we are SUPPOSE to be talking about, is how to PROMOTE WRESTLING!!! and what is going to happen if we can't/won't/don't!?!?!? Coupled with the POS ncaa and NIL!!!!Field Hockey was just an example. I attended a men's baseball game at UMBC. Similar set up. Facilities aren't designed for attendance when few attend.
It seems your position is pretty much anti any sport that doesn't have an associated professional league, and even then you'd be down on it if it couldn't produce revenue for the school.
Even football and basketball aren't supported at certain schools. It's the division of their TV $s that keeps them in business. With this as the litmus test, consider wrestling doomed.
Has nothing to do with me being against any sport!!! What we are SUPPOSE to be talking about, is how to PROMOTE WRESTLING!!!
NP, I have stated my views on many things including womens sports and womens wrestling. I would have never believed womens wrestling would ever be a thing!!! I do not really care for it much, but that is NOT to say I am against it. I have stated I would like to see the mens and womens teams working together more to build BOTH!!!My bad. It seemed to me you took to disparaging women's sports and other sports that don't enjoy broad support from the general populous.
I think there is more support for wrestling when there is more support for all Olympic sports and all women's sports. I saw videos of Penn State wrestlers supporting their women's volleyball team when it went on its champions run.
Wrestling support needn't disparage other sports likes women's to build itself up. I'm happy Iowa has a women's wrestling team and it's doing well.
HAWKS, Oklahoma st, and maybe Ohio st????? I am not seeing really any chance for any other teams!!!
correct.
all the money in the world.
they didn't have to drop wrestling to add baseball.
they could have added a women's sport. i'm sorry but your excuse is bs.
This should change now that Carl has quit.Sure the biggest difference is Penn State's dominance over the last 13 years.
Q1: In the 13 championships before 2011 (1998-2010), how many different schools finished within 20 points of the team champion?
A1: 4 (Ohio State, Iowa State, Iowa and Minnesota, and Cael coached Iowa State then).
Q2: How many different champion schools in that time period?
A2: 3 (Iowa, Oklahoma St, Minnesota)
Compare that to the 13 championships between 2011 to 2024:
A1: 6 teams finished within 20 points: all in the following list, plus Minnesota and Oklahoma St who are in the 1998 to 2010 list, and Cornell. So actually two more teams.
A2: 3 different team champions (Penn State, Ohio State, Iowa). Two different names but same amount.
So no, it doesn't seem more teams were more likely to win the team title. Sure, you just don't like the distribution and changes among the three, and the reduction Iowa has seen. That's understandable.
In the past 27 years Iowa and Oklahoma St had their periods dominance. Minnesota has fallen much further than Iowa. Ohio State rose a bit and stalled out. Oklahoma St is pushing for a renaissance after it fell off. And Penn State is continuing its new found dominance under Cael.
Regardingless, with finishing within 20 points as the measure of contention, it looks like in any given year at most three teams had a serious chance of winning. And over the last 27 years, one could stretch it to say at most seven different schools have ever been in contention.
AHHH, you are leaving out way TWOOOO much!!! The B1Ggest is the fact that so few skools can have an individual champ!!!! With that, IF they get one, the chances of keeping him is SLIM!!!!Sure the biggest difference is Penn State's dominance over the last 13 years.
Q1: In the 13 championships before 2011 (1998-2010), how many different schools finished within 20 points of the team champion?
A1: 4 (Ohio State, Iowa State, Iowa and Minnesota, and Cael coached Iowa State then).
Q2: How many different champion schools in that time period?
A2: 3 (Iowa, Oklahoma St, Minnesota)
Compare that to the 13 championships between 2011 to 2024:
A1: 6 teams finished within 20 points: all in the following list, plus Minnesota and Oklahoma St who are in the 1998 to 2010 list, and Cornell. So actually two more teams.
A2: 3 different team champions (Penn State, Ohio State, Iowa). Two different names but same amount.
So no, it doesn't seem more teams were more likely to win the team title. Sure, you just don't like the distribution and changes among the three, and the reduction Iowa has seen. That's understandable.
In the past 27 years Iowa and Oklahoma St had their periods dominance. Minnesota has fallen much further than Iowa. Ohio State rose a bit and stalled out. Oklahoma St is pushing for a renaissance after it fell off. And Penn State is continuing its new found dominance under Cael.
Regardingless, with finishing within 20 points as the measure of contention, it looks like in any given year at most three teams had a serious chance of winning. And over the last 27 years, one could stretch it to say at most seven different schools have ever been in contention.
AHHH, you are leaving out way TWOOOO much!!! The B1Ggest is the fact that so few skools can have an individual champ!!!! With that, IF they get one, the chances of keeping him is SLIM!!!!
Even in the "haydays" of IOWA dominance, MOST often, a team scoring around 120 points could win. You built a team by having maybe 1,2, maybe 3 HAMMERS, then a few HIGH level kids, and rounded out the line up the best you could. AGAIN, in most years, this would be enough to either WIN and/or be in the title hunt!!!
That is currently OVER!!! There is NO path to a title right now without TEN HAMMERS!!!! and there does not appear to be an end in sight to this. For example, IOWA has an unbelievable team NOW and coming in with the new recruits. Currently, this years team, would need a few MIRACLES to take place to even have a chance!!!
Think about what I am telling you here!!!! The hawks could punch 3-4 to the FINALS, have 3 champs, 7-8 AAs and still LOSE!!!! Next year, we unleash ANGELO, move ARNOLD to his proper weight. We have the #2 165 coming back, the #1 133, a top heavy, the #1 125 in the country coming in etc...... AND we are still looking for some kind of way to knock of the CRIMINAL over in Happy Low lying ditch over there!?!?!?!?
Then, even the following year, where I feel IOWA has a good shot, we STILL need several things to fall our way!!!! Now some other fans from other skools can certainly chime in here!!!! I would love to here from those who follow Oklahoma st, Ohio st, Minny, Nebraska, etc..... DO ANY of you see a path??????
I mean you look at the CYHAWK rivalry. IOWA has owned them for a while but the dual has been competitive as of late. BUT if/when the HAWKS get to that next level which they need to do. That dual becomes a joke!!! In other words, F*** st would smoke em this year, and I am not sure they can keep the pace and that goes for just about every other team?!?!??!
I herd that was fake news.This should change now that Carl has quit.
I read it on the interwebs somewhere.