They didn't keep the secret genius, you and your type just choose not to believe it, unless the MSM tells you. The evidence is out there, but the ignorant masses refuse to listen. Your fault, your failure, your lack of comprehension.
Proof that some conspiracies are real.
- Thread starter Aegon_Targaryen
- Start date
And I'm sure you're able to tell us what make sh!t up evidence is? Explain to us anypuke, please explain.
Pathetic attempt on your part. Absolutely pathetic.
Some people won't believe anything unless some "official news source" tells them it's legit. If the cops don't catch the suspect, or if no formal charges are brought, then it never happened. People who believe everything is a conspiracy are a novelty. People who believe NOTHING is a conspiracy are dangerous.
How could anyone possibly believe that one man shoots the President, then the assassin gets caught within hours for an entirely different incident, then gets killed by some random mobster, who then dies of cancer a few years later, and that very same Presidents brother also gets assassinated, and NOT wonder if something may have been going on behind the scenes with the situation?
How f'n stupid and gullible can people be? Again, as I told anypuke, the evidence is out there. You just simply need to take the time to research and understand it. Of course they won't do that though, because the MSM tells them to not worry about it. The very same MSM that is owned and controlled by the same people who own and control the politicians in Washington.
So true. The recent news that Warren Harding actually did get a lady pregnant and she had his kid is interesting. She wrote a book in 1927 after his death to earn money for herself and her child. And the heats been on ever since. Now that DNA has proven she told the truth, after she has long since passed away? It's just a shame to think of the stuff she went through.
Disbelief has become the norm I'm afraid. Which truly sets people up to be ignorant of possibilities until those possibilities strike 'em head on.
I'm actually on-the-fence about JFK. I think it's an incredible feat for Oswald, but not impossible. However, there are other aspects of the case that seem to coincidentally complicate it. I've been convinced that the head shot was an exit shot that would/could scatter the tissue on exit and cause the head movement, and I am aware of the seating positions and the magic bullet isn't all that magical. The only real issue I have with the JFK murder is the head shot exiting blows his head apart, and the first shot is a clean exit. I think that at least implies two types of ammo. I'm not sure. I don't think Oswald's capture is all that startling or hard to believe. The subsequent murder of Oswald does make me raise an eyebrow, but, Ruby had plenty of time to admit anything. Losing JFK's brain, and many of the other odd associated events linked to the case could just be coincidences, but it can also, possibly, call attention to more. Presidents like JFK are targets. JFK challenged the Mob, the MIC, and, most importantly, the FED!
As far as 9/11, there is no way I will ever believe the official story. No... way... no... day. I don't know exactly what happened in every aspect of all of those events, but I know the "official story" is a load of sh*t. Only 3 skyscrapers in history have fallen due to fire, and they happened to all fall on the same day. WTC7 has, and always will, scream "pulled demolition." How anyone can see that and not know it's being pulled is beyond me. SIlverstein even said "Go ahead and let's pull it."
<---- a traditional building being pulled. Looks exactly like WTC tower buildings.
Same with the Pentagon. No way that "hole" is from a full-sized Boeing 767. And, if one of the events of that day is suspect, then they all are suspect.
I have this instinctive impulse to NEVER trust ANYTHING the government "tells us." It's not paranoia. It's common sense. Politicians are some of the most nefarious, notorious and well-documented LIARS that ever existed.
As far as 9/11, there is no way I will ever believe the official story. No... way... no... day. I don't know exactly what happened in every aspect of all of those events, but I know the "official story" is a load of sh*t. Only 3 skyscrapers in history have fallen due to fire, and they happened to all fall on the same day. WTC7 has, and always will, scream "pulled demolition." How anyone can see that and not know it's being pulled is beyond me. SIlverstein even said "Go ahead and let's pull it."
Same with the Pentagon. No way that "hole" is from a full-sized Boeing 767. And, if one of the events of that day is suspect, then they all are suspect.
I have this instinctive impulse to NEVER trust ANYTHING the government "tells us." It's not paranoia. It's common sense. Politicians are some of the most nefarious, notorious and well-documented LIARS that ever existed.
Last edited:
Some people won't believe there is not a conspiracy behind every door.
With Kennedy we have LBJ was behind it, the mob was behind it, the Cubans might have did it, the Russians brainwashed Oswald, the bullet and bomb makers were the ones, and then the people who tie any number of these theories together.
It is as if we are saying look at all the theories I can come up with so one of them must be true.
Are you familiar with the Lavon Affair?I'm actually on-the-fence about JFK. I think it's an incredible feat for Oswald, but not impossible. However, there are other aspects of the case that seem to coincidentally complicate it. I've been convinced that the head shot was an exit shot that would/could scatter the tissue on exit and cause the head movement, and I am aware of the seating positions and the magic bullet isn't all that magical. The only real issue I have with the JFK murder is the head shot exiting blows his head apart, and the first shot is a clean exit. I think that at least implies two types of ammo. I'm not sure. I don't think Oswald's capture is all that startling or hard to believe. The subsequent murder of Oswald does make me raise an eyebrow, but, Ruby had plenty of time to admit anything. Losing JFK's brain, and many of the other odd associated events linked to the case could just be coincidences, but it can also, possibly, call attention to more. Presidents like JFK are targets. JFK challenged the Mob, the MIC, and, most importantly, the FED!
As far as 9/11, there is no way I will ever believe the official story. No... way... no... day. I don't know exactly what happened in every aspect of all of those events, but I know the "official story" is a load of sh*t. Only 3 skyscrapers in history have fallen due to fire, and they happened to all fall on the same day. WTC7 has, and always will, scream "pulled demolition." How anyone can see that and not know it's being pulled is beyond me. SIlverstein even said "Go ahead and let's pull it."
<---- a traditional building being pulled. Looks exactly like WTC tower buildings.
Same with the Pentagon. No way that "hole" is from a full-sized Boeing 767. And, if one of the events of that day is suspect, then they all are suspect.
I have this instinctive impulse to NEVER trust ANYTHING the government "tells us." It's not paranoia. It's common sense. Politicians are some of the most nefarious, notorious and well-documented LIARS that ever existed.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/lavon.html
There were 2 conspiracies re: JFK assassination. The one that killed him and the one that covered it up.
Gerald Posner wrote the establishment viewpoint in his book, Case Closed. In that book, he said that if Mark Lane defended Oswald, he never would have been convicted. Well, if Posner believes that, then you cannot go around saying Oswald is guilty of murder. Then again, that would explain why Oswald was immediately killed. Quickly point the finger at LHO, kill him, and then you forego a lengthy, investigative trial that would have released him of all guilt. Then America would be still wondering about JFK's killer still on the loose. Now it was wrapped up cleanly.
Except, the Warren Commission was a fraud from the jump. Allen Dulles was on the Commission. After the Bay of Pigs fiasco, he was fired by JFK. I guess he didn't have an axe to grind. JFK also fired Richard Bissell and Charles Cabell of the CIA and threatened to tear the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter them to the wind. If JFK had succeeded in doing so, the country would then have an accounting of all that money. The NSA would not be listening to all your phone calls and reading your e-mail today.
Cabell's brother, Earl, was Mayor of Dallas, at the time of the murder. A nice little way to cover tracks, since it was not a federal offense at that time to bump off the POTUS. It fell under the jurisdiction of Texas. Also on the WC was Gerald Ford, whom Time Magazine called the CIA's best friend in Congress. The WC's stated goal was to put the public at ease that the assassin was not at large. It didn't say anything about finding the truth.
In fact, the U.S. Attorney General under LBJ and good ole boy, Nicholas Katzenbach, wrote his famous memo to Bill Moyers, 3 days after the coup de tat, stating, "The public must be satisfied that Oswald was the assassin; that he did not have confederates who are still at large", so as to combat speculation of conspiracy. This isn't a smoking gun. It's a smoking cannon.
On that same day, 11/25/63, LBJ orders the President's car be sent to Dearborn, Mi. to be re-rurbished. Are you friggin kidding me? It's a crime scene. You can't tamper with that evidence. Why wasn't LBJ looked at as a suspect? The old Roman question comes into play here...cui bono. Johnson certainly benefitted. JFK wanted LBJ off the ticket in1964. Johnson had 2 swords of Damocles hanging over his head with the Billy Sol Estes trial and that Baker guy. Name escapes me. That all went away on 11/22/63. Also retracted as Johnson's 1st order was the recission of NSM 263. Kennedy authorized the removal of ALL troops from Vietnam.
Why is it LHO tax returns still have not been released to the public? Is it a matter of national security? It would certainly point a direction into how he earned a living. Of course, we now know his CIA handler, George de Morenschildt, was murdered the day he was to testify before the Senate.
If LHO was a Commie, why would he want to harm JFK? He aborted air cover for Cuba. He had the U.S. remove its missiles from Turkey that were pointed at the USSR during the missile crisis. This pissed off the establishment as did the oil depletion allowance for wildcatters.
Kennedy wanted peace and that was unacceptable to the MIC. The world was not kind to Gandhi, MLK or Jesus either. Peace will get you killed.
Gerald Posner wrote the establishment viewpoint in his book, Case Closed. In that book, he said that if Mark Lane defended Oswald, he never would have been convicted. Well, if Posner believes that, then you cannot go around saying Oswald is guilty of murder. Then again, that would explain why Oswald was immediately killed. Quickly point the finger at LHO, kill him, and then you forego a lengthy, investigative trial that would have released him of all guilt. Then America would be still wondering about JFK's killer still on the loose. Now it was wrapped up cleanly.
Except, the Warren Commission was a fraud from the jump. Allen Dulles was on the Commission. After the Bay of Pigs fiasco, he was fired by JFK. I guess he didn't have an axe to grind. JFK also fired Richard Bissell and Charles Cabell of the CIA and threatened to tear the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter them to the wind. If JFK had succeeded in doing so, the country would then have an accounting of all that money. The NSA would not be listening to all your phone calls and reading your e-mail today.
Cabell's brother, Earl, was Mayor of Dallas, at the time of the murder. A nice little way to cover tracks, since it was not a federal offense at that time to bump off the POTUS. It fell under the jurisdiction of Texas. Also on the WC was Gerald Ford, whom Time Magazine called the CIA's best friend in Congress. The WC's stated goal was to put the public at ease that the assassin was not at large. It didn't say anything about finding the truth.
In fact, the U.S. Attorney General under LBJ and good ole boy, Nicholas Katzenbach, wrote his famous memo to Bill Moyers, 3 days after the coup de tat, stating, "The public must be satisfied that Oswald was the assassin; that he did not have confederates who are still at large", so as to combat speculation of conspiracy. This isn't a smoking gun. It's a smoking cannon.
On that same day, 11/25/63, LBJ orders the President's car be sent to Dearborn, Mi. to be re-rurbished. Are you friggin kidding me? It's a crime scene. You can't tamper with that evidence. Why wasn't LBJ looked at as a suspect? The old Roman question comes into play here...cui bono. Johnson certainly benefitted. JFK wanted LBJ off the ticket in1964. Johnson had 2 swords of Damocles hanging over his head with the Billy Sol Estes trial and that Baker guy. Name escapes me. That all went away on 11/22/63. Also retracted as Johnson's 1st order was the recission of NSM 263. Kennedy authorized the removal of ALL troops from Vietnam.
Why is it LHO tax returns still have not been released to the public? Is it a matter of national security? It would certainly point a direction into how he earned a living. Of course, we now know his CIA handler, George de Morenschildt, was murdered the day he was to testify before the Senate.
If LHO was a Commie, why would he want to harm JFK? He aborted air cover for Cuba. He had the U.S. remove its missiles from Turkey that were pointed at the USSR during the missile crisis. This pissed off the establishment as did the oil depletion allowance for wildcatters.
Kennedy wanted peace and that was unacceptable to the MIC. The world was not kind to Gandhi, MLK or Jesus either. Peace will get you killed.
The government in the wake of a presidential assassination should NEVER be trusted!
Watch the film "The Conspirator" about Mary Surratt's trial (and loosely discusses the others that were accused and found guilty). Secretary of War, Edwin Stanton, and the military tribunal that found all 8 defendants guilty, were guilty of buying witnesses, giving witnesses immunity for bearing false witness, overriding a writ of habeus corpus, and a list of other travesties. It reminds me of the Japanese internment camps... just when the country's rule of law was needed the most, it was taken. Mary Surratt's attorney had fought for the Union in the war and gave up law after that travesty and total injustice. Why fight for "Truth, Justice and the American Way" when the American Way is a big, fat lie? Fortunately, after that event, the Supreme Court made it impossible for civilians to be denied a civil trial... even during wartime, ESPECIALLY during wartime.
Point is; when the President is killed, don't look for "justice" to be served by default when the crooked-ass government is involved. Most people possess some distrust of their government, but they seem to forget or lose that distrust when they need it the most!
Watch the film "The Conspirator" about Mary Surratt's trial (and loosely discusses the others that were accused and found guilty). Secretary of War, Edwin Stanton, and the military tribunal that found all 8 defendants guilty, were guilty of buying witnesses, giving witnesses immunity for bearing false witness, overriding a writ of habeus corpus, and a list of other travesties. It reminds me of the Japanese internment camps... just when the country's rule of law was needed the most, it was taken. Mary Surratt's attorney had fought for the Union in the war and gave up law after that travesty and total injustice. Why fight for "Truth, Justice and the American Way" when the American Way is a big, fat lie? Fortunately, after that event, the Supreme Court made it impossible for civilians to be denied a civil trial... even during wartime, ESPECIALLY during wartime.
Point is; when the President is killed, don't look for "justice" to be served by default when the crooked-ass government is involved. Most people possess some distrust of their government, but they seem to forget or lose that distrust when they need it the most!
that's what Nixon and Watergate was about: it was about covering up the jfk murder. they just said it was about politics. it was about jfk
And on Nixon's Watergate tapes, he said that the Warren Commission was the greatest fraud perpetrated on the American people.
The Nazis did a pretty good job keeping things secret. It happens all the time. In the case of JFK, 30 some odd witnesses had their lives taken from them in their prime within 3 years of 11/22/63. That's like a 1 in a trillion chance. Phones were wire-tapped and people were bumped off. Why is it that millions of fedgov documents still have not been released...in spite of requests? What else bad can happen? The POTUS was already killed. It was a lone gunmen, right?
One of the doctors got in front of the media and said 3 times that the bullet came from the front. That doctor admitted 15 years later that he received a visit from the SS and told him to switch his story to comply with the WC lie, ahem, version. They threatened him with their guns. Praetorian guards just follow orders.
Last edited:
