So, this one didn't crash then!!!!
Some of you on here just are rooting for SpaceX failures because you disagree with Musk’s politics. I agree with you that Musk has gone down a path that way that is unproductive. But his politics do not affect SpaceX’s success and future path in Space exploration! SpaceX is a huge company with thousands of employees and an operational plan that is far superior to other competitors. It is way more than Elon Musk.You need mental help. Seek it.
You need mental help. Seek it.
So, this one didn't crash then!!!!
Da es quire is back.Some of you on here just are rooting for SpaceX failures because you disagree with Musk’s politics. I agree with you that Musk has gone down a path that way that is unproductive. But his politics do not affect SpaceX’s success and future path in Space exploration! SpaceX is a huge company with thousands of employees and an operational plan that is far superior to other competitors. It is way more than Elon Musk.
GHOX, Joe, Belem, etc. - you need to abandon your little petty personal grievances (and your scientific illiteracy) and simply grow up and get with the program.
The IFT-3 stage 1 super heavy booster number 10 did not blow up. It splashed down in the ocean. Also, the Starship SN 28 didn’t blow up, more like burned up on reentry.
Each of SpaceX’s tests of Starship have progressed further than the ones before. During the inaugural test flight in April 2023, the rocket exploded about four minutes in—before its two stages, the Starship spacecraft and the Super Heavy booster, could separate.Last November, in a second test, the spacecraft and booster successfully separated, then both exploded shortly after, Space.com’s Josh Dinner wrote at the time. Starship reached its planned orbit and entered space during its third launch in March, but the spacecraft broke apart during re-entry, about 49 minutes into the mission. The booster was also destroyed before landing.The fourth test launched from Boca Chica, Texas, on Thursday morning. “The primary objectives will be executing a landing burn and soft splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico with the Super Heavy booster and achieving a controlled entry of Starship,” SpaceX wrote in a post on its website.
This was was definitely successful compared w/ the initial 3.
SpaceX's Starship Lands Successfully for the First Time in a Test Flight
Three previous uncrewed test flights ended with Starship being destroyed, but both the booster and the spacecraft splashed down on the fourth trywww.smithsonianmag.com
Based on a 0.250 batting average, would you fly on it?
Each of SpaceX’s tests of Starship have progressed further than the ones before. During the inaugural test flight in April 2023, the rocket exploded about four minutes in—before its two stages, the Starship spacecraft and the Super Heavy booster, could separate.Last November, in a second test, the spacecraft and booster successfully separated, then both exploded shortly after, Space.com’s Josh Dinner wrote at the time. Starship reached its planned orbit and entered space during its third launch in March, but the spacecraft broke apart during re-entry, about 49 minutes into the mission. The booster was also destroyed before landing.The fourth test launched from Boca Chica, Texas, on Thursday morning. “The primary objectives will be executing a landing burn and soft splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico with the Super Heavy booster and achieving a controlled entry of Starship,” SpaceX wrote in a post on its website.
This was was definitely successful compared w/ the initial 3.
SpaceX's Starship Lands Successfully for the First Time in a Test Flight
Three previous uncrewed test flights ended with Starship being destroyed, but both the booster and the spacecraft splashed down on the fourth trywww.smithsonianmag.com
Based on a 0.250 batting average, would you fly on it?
You took issue with my "will this one blow up?" comment.These are test flights. Good grief.
Elon should have hired Joe's Place. We'd have an interstate highway system high and speed rail on Mars by now.
You seem to have the same problem OP does. You think that criticism of Musk is criticism of SpaceX/Tesla.Some of you on here just are rooting for SpaceX failures because you disagree with Musk’s politics. I agree with you that Musk has gone down a path that way that is unproductive. But his politics do not affect SpaceX’s success and future path in Space exploration! SpaceX is a huge company with thousands of employees and an operational plan that is far superior to other competitors. It is way more than Elon Musk.
GHOX, Joe, Belem, etc. - you need to abandon your little petty personal grievances (and your scientific illiteracy) and simply grow up and get with the program.
You are completely incorrect on all counts. Moran.You seem to have the same problem OP does. You think that criticism of Musk is criticism of SpaceX/Tesla.
Right now Tesla shareholders are voting on Musk's insane compensation plan - he wants $56 BILLION and it threatening to leave if he doesn't get it. Tesla should take him up on that offer and get a CEO who isn't driven by whatever he reads on twitter or his adderall filled rages. SpaceX had a person who just distracted Musk from screwing things up while they tried to get real work done. The starship redesigned the top because elon thought a pointy one looked cooler.
You are completely incorrect on all counts. Moran. And what Tesla does to Musk matters not to me.
Some of you on here just are rooting for SpaceX failures because you disagree with Musk’s politics. I agree with you that Musk has gone down a path that way that is unproductive. But his politics do not affect SpaceX’s success and future path in Space exploration! SpaceX is a huge company with thousands of employees and an operational plan that is far superior to other competitors. It is way more than Elon Musk.
GHOX, Joe, Belem, etc. - you need to abandon your little petty personal grievances (and your scientific illiteracy) and simply grow up and get with the program.
You seem to have the same problem OP does. You think that criticism of Musk is criticism of SpaceX/Tesla.
Right now Tesla shareholders are voting on Musk's insane compensation plan - he wants $56 BILLION and it threatening to leave if he doesn't get it. Tesla should take him up on that offer and get a CEO who isn't driven by whatever he reads on twitter or his adderall filled rages. SpaceX had a person who just distracted Musk from screwing things up while they tried to get real work done. The starship redesigned the top because elon thought a pointy one looked cooler.
Now don’t go off the deep end, Joe. You won’t be able to haul asteroids back from the Oort Cloud!Mods.....this rrk77 model Bot appears to be replying to itself, and is broken
Please repair.
Or toss it.
Well thought out reply.You are completely incorrect on all counts. Moran.
I thought you would eventually see the light.Well thought out reply.
You think Elno made those recs?Only watch this if you want your delusion that Elon isn’t a “real engineer” shattered.
Space Studies Board and Board on Physics and Astronomy November 17, 2021 with Adam Burrows from Princeton University.
Just like any MatSci/Astropyhysics student could tell you that dragging an asteroid back from the Oort Cloud to Earth is a non—starter!You think Elno made those recs?
How cute!!!
FWIW, carbon fiber composite matrices are polymer resins. It ain't exactly rocket science that they will have a far lower melting point than any type of steel. Any 1st/2nd year MatSci student could tell you this.
IIRC, you were telling us that "astronauts could go out there and do the mining...."Just like any MatSci/Astropyhysics student could tell you that dragging an asteroid back from the Oort Cloud to Earth is a non—starter!
So what does your space company use?You think Elno made those recs?
How cute!!!
FWIW, carbon fiber composite matrices are polymer resins. It ain't exactly rocket science that they will have a far lower melting point than any type of steel. Any 1st/2nd year MatSci student could tell you this.
You think Elno made those recs?
How cute!!!
FWIW, carbon fiber composite matrices are polymer resins. It ain't exactly rocket science that they will have a far lower melting point than any type of steel. Any 1st/2nd year MatSci student could tell you this.
I'm sure you do....Yes I do believe he was deeply involved in those decisions.