Counting this year, his youngest son is a HS Frosh, that’s four years until he’s a freshman at Iowa. Four (maybe five years) in college. So 8-9 years away.Does he retire after his last son uses up his eligibility at the U of I?
9 more years. Ouch.Counting this year, his youngest son is a HS Frosh, that’s four years until he’s a freshman at Iowa. Four (maybe five years) in college. So 8-9 years away.
However, that leaves plenty of time for Connor to get some coaching time under his belt and I could see Fran turning the program over to Connor in 8-9 years.
Or the well runs dry? Or????Fran and KF will be here until they die
Does he retire after his last son uses up his eligibility at the U of I?
That would be my guess. I know everyone is in a pissy mood because we just lost a game at Wisconsin we were favored to lose (the horror! No one loses in Madison!) but there is a lot to look forward to beyond this season. I never thought we’d make the NCAA this year anyway , so just being in the mention still is gravy. If this team makes the NIT, which is a good bet, I’ll be thrilled.Does he retire after his last son uses up his eligibility at the U of I?
He's just getting warmed up.Does he retire after his last son uses up his eligibility at the U of I?
...that doesn't defend or rebound.That would be my guess. I know everyone is in a pissy mood because we just lost a game at Wisconsin we were favored to lose (the horror! No one loses in Madison!) but there is a lot to look forward to beyond this season. I never thought we’d make the NCAA this year anyway , so just being in the mention still is gravy. If this team makes the NIT, which is a good bet, I’ll be thrilled.
In 3 years we will have a class of probably 3 top 100 recruits in Jack McCaffery, Weiskamp and Sandfort. Next years class we will get the best point guard in the Fran era in Dasonte Bowen and a solid #2 guard in Josh Dix. The year after we get Freeman, who will be top 75 I’m guessing. The team that returns next year has solid bones and I expect we will have real production from Mulvey and Ogundule.
Is Jack going to get an offer? I hear he's tall but also slow footed.
Last I saw, Kakert had posted a list where he was a top 10 player among an elite camp for kids his age. From my inexpert opinion after looking at fair amount of video, he seems like a really good ball handling point guard type, with less athleticism than PMac but more of a solid build with a really good looking 3 point shot. He seems like the best prospect of the 3, by far. He’s 6’8”, so he’s still growing into his body.Is Jack going to get an offer? I hear he's tall but also slow footed.
Not true. But this mentality is why Iowa basketball will remain mediocre.The next guy is going to have the same results as Fran. It's just Iowa basketball.
If "this mentality" is the reason Iowa BB is mediocre, then you can expect another 50 years that are pretty much like the last 50, because I don't think it will change.Not true. But this mentality is why Iowa basketball will remain mediocre.
I’m old enough to remember when Carver was rocking every night. The product has produced the apathy. Many coaches have proven you can win at Iowa. Put out a better product, attendance will follow suit.If "this mentality" is the reason Iowa BB is mediocre, then you can expect another 50 years that are pretty much like the last 50, because I don't think it will change.
Attendance at games is a pretty good indicator of how passionate Iowa fans are about basketball.
So am I. That would be the Tom Davis era I presume, and the fans ran him out. They were bored and wanted to get to the "next level".I’m old enough to remember when Carver was rocking every night. The product has produced the apathy. Many coaches have proven you can win at Iowa. Put out a better product, attendance will follow suit.
Yawn. More teams that look exactly alike, and never reaching a sweet 16. It’s great to be a Hawkeye?That would be my guess. I know everyone is in a pissy mood because we just lost a game at Wisconsin we were favored to lose (the horror! No one loses in Madison!) but there is a lot to look forward to beyond this season. I never thought we’d make the NCAA this year anyway , so just being in the mention still is gravy. If this team makes the NIT, which is a good bet, I’ll be thrilled.
In 3 years we will have a class of probably 3 top 100 recruits in Jack McCaffery, Weiskamp and Sandfort. Next years class we will get the best point guard in the Fran era in Dasonte Bowen and a solid #2 guard in Josh Dix. The year after we get Freeman, who will be top 75 I’m guessing. The team that returns next year has solid bones and I expect we will have real production from Mulvey and Ogundule.
Well, yeah, there are no guarantees. About the only guarantee is the Iowa basketball program has reached its ceiling under Fran.So am I. That would be the Tom Davis era I presume, and the fans ran him out. They were bored and wanted to get to the "next level".
Davis had a winning % of .543 in B1G play. Fran is .505. If Fran had won 8 more B1G games in his 11 year tenure, he would have the same winning % as Davis.
Lute Olsen had things rolling, but left for greener (perhaps "browner") pastures in the desert. Ralph Miller did the same 50 years ago.
The Hawks have had 7 coaches since Miller left with a combined B1G record of 441-447 (.497).
Arguably, two of the three best coaches Iowa has has in the last 60 years left on their own. The third one was dumped.
I'm no Fran-fan, but I am far from convinced that the next guy, or the guy after that, is going to do a whole lot better.
Well, yeah, there are no guarantees. About the only guarantee is the Iowa basketball program has reached its ceiling under Fran.
And it might take more than one hire to get better results. But in this day and age, you can turn a program around in one season thanks to the transfer portal turning into free agency. Iowa State has proven that. At this point, what do you risk? Fan apathy is increasing and in twelve seasons Fran has yet to get an Iowa team to the second week of the Dance. Why are we sticking with a commodity whose track record speaks for itself? It’s silly.
I agree not worth getting angry over. Most of us are just apathetic at this point.There in lies the problem and the answer. "We" are not sticking with him - the University is. Since it isn't a pro sport (but getting closer every day), the #1 objective is not winning championships. Fran has a track record of putting pretty good teams on the floor and winning 20 games. For the U, and probably for Barta, that's good enough. It's safe, predictable - the BB program on autopilot. Barb Wilson can go back to trying to build the largest hospital in the universe.
The only thing that's going to get him fired is a Lick-type record or a few more "Fran moments" that embarrass the U.
For me, it's not worth getting angry over.
BTW - the Sweet 16 is mentioned a TON in these threads. Fran's teams have lost in the second round 4 times. If they had made it to the SS say, two of those 4 times, would anything be different now?
I’m not angry. I’m indifferent. And I’m tired of being indifferent.There in lies the problem and the answer. "We" are not sticking with him - the University is. Since it isn't a pro sport (but getting closer every day), the #1 objective is not winning championships. Fran has a track record of putting pretty good teams on the floor and winning 20 games. For the U, and probably for Barta, that's good enough. It's safe, predictable - the BB program on autopilot. Barb Wilson can go back to trying to build the largest hospital in the universe.
The only thing that's going to get him fired is a Lick-type record or a few more "Fran moments" that embarrass the U.
For me, it's not worth getting angry over.
BTW - the Sweet 16 is mentioned a TON in these threads. Fran's teams have lost in the second round 4 times. If they had made it to the SS say, two of those 4 times, would anything be different now?
You're talking about a guy who's taken 4 different teams to the NCAA tournament, 3 of them in one bid leagues. And a guy who resurrected Iowa BB from the dead after Todd Lackluster. And who has a winning Big Ten record. You are not bright.
We'll still need rebounding and defense.That would be my guess. I know everyone is in a pissy mood because we just lost a game at Wisconsin we were favored to lose (the horror! No one loses in Madison!) but there is a lot to look forward to beyond this season. I never thought we’d make the NCAA this year anyway , so just being in the mention still is gravy. If this team makes the NIT, which is a good bet, I’ll be thrilled.
In 3 years we will have a class of probably 3 top 100 recruits in Jack McCaffery, Weiskamp and Sandfort. Next years class we will get the best point guard in the Fran era in Dasonte Bowen and a solid #2 guard in Josh Dix. The year after we get Freeman, who will be top 75 I’m guessing. The team that returns next year has solid bones and I expect we will have real production from Mulvey and Ogundule.
I'm asking if it would make any difference. It would be nice if Fran had made it to the SS, but it wouldn't change my opinion about the Iowa basketball program. It's just not a very strong program.I agree not worth getting angry over. Most of us are just apathetic at this point.
What two second round games did we even have a chance to win? The sweet sixteen is mentioned by knowledgeable bball fans that realize that is a standard that a good program achieves at least every now and then. But here we are asking hypotheticals about IF we made them?
Gotcha. And agreed.I'm asking if it would make any difference. I would be nice if Fran had made it to the SS, but it wouldn't change my opinion about the Iowa basketball program. It's just not a very strong program.
One thing that caught my eye is that during all that time, Fran has had only 3 seasons where his teams lost less than 10 games.Fran has 36 year head coaching career and zero sweet 16s.
The recruits you mentioned that we haven’t received commitments from yet aren’t necessarily the solution to our defensive or rebounding woes.That would be my guess. I know everyone is in a pissy mood because we just lost a game at Wisconsin we were favored to lose (the horror! No one loses in Madison!) but there is a lot to look forward to beyond this season. I never thought we’d make the NCAA this year anyway , so just being in the mention still is gravy. If this team makes the NIT, which is a good bet, I’ll be thrilled.
In 3 years we will have a class of probably 3 top 100 recruits in Jack McCaffery, Weiskamp and Sandfort. Next years class we will get the best point guard in the Fran era in Dasonte Bowen and a solid #2 guard in Josh Dix. The year after we get Freeman, who will be top 75 I’m guessing. The team that returns next year has solid bones and I expect we will have real production from Mulvey and Ogundule.
It's not true unless it's on Twitter.Do I need to add a Twitter quote to make this more official?
Great post here. This is Barta's dream scenario. Barta is not a risk taker so he's not going to make any move w/ Fran. I think the "Fran moments" climaxed when Fran called the refs "F'ing cheaters".....>Sure he'll blow up occasionally, but you won't see any more accusations like that (or anything worse) from Fran. Fran has also set himself up w/ 10-12 "free" wins vs bad teams, so the schedule is working in his favor now. Beat the 300+ teams, squeek out a few early wins and win 8-9 Big10 games is the plan. That gets them to 20-10 (ish) and who can fire a guy who wins 20 games every year?There in lies the problem and the answer. "We" are not sticking with him - the University is. Since it isn't a pro sport (but getting closer every day), the #1 objective is not winning championships. Fran has a track record of putting pretty good teams on the floor and winning 20 games. For the U, and probably for Barta, that's good enough. It's safe, predictable - the BB program on autopilot. Barb Wilson can go back to trying to build the largest hospital in the universe.
The only thing that's going to get him fired is a Lick-type record or a few more "Fran moments" that embarrass the U.
For me, it's not worth getting angry over.
BTW - the Sweet 16 is mentioned a TON in these threads. Fran's teams have lost in the second round 4 times. If they had made it to the SS say, two of those 4 times, would anything be different now?
You can certainly tell by watching the crowds at CHA. It's like watching the Stepford Wives.The ho-hum attitude taken towards basketball rolls down hill to the fans. If the, U is willing to accept that, I suppose I can follow suit.....
So, I guess the question on the table really boils down to "Is fan apathy enough to make a coaching change?" In football, I would say "yes" - Men's basketball? I'm not sure........You can certainly tell by watching the crowds at CHA. It's like watching the Stepford Wives.