ADVERTISEMENT

Receiving Core

I posted something about the wrs looking better against Wisconsin. They were really good today. Brandon Smith's catch was awesome when he caught it behind the dude. Easly and ISM all had solid games too. I really want Smith to get that td...
First time I've seen an aggressive killer instinct out of an Iowa receiver on Smith's catch in quite awhile.
 
You cannot say that. The poster may actually think the word is “core” as in the central part. If so, that is a WOB.

You can find a few dozen people here every day who think “they’re, their, and there” or “your and you’re” are interchangeable because they don’t know any better, but doesn’t make any of them, or this, a WOB. They’re homophones. You’re looking for an eggcorn, like granite instead of granted. Or pre-Madonna, instead of prima donna. This will help:
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo...ere-are-100-eggcorns-that-we-say-pass-mustard
If you’re arguing that the poster is actually talking about the central part of the receiving unit, it hurts your argument even more so. Because then what he wrote would actually make sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nu2u and DaCDiggity
Nice progress by the WRs ... and it's nice to see them gaining confidence. When they do that ... it helps the TEs too.

Nice game by the O ... because the injuries among the back 7 were mounting ... and the O had to carry the load today.
 
Good thing the receivers stepped up today... if the passing game wasn’t clicking the Hawks (or as my daughter calls them, the “parrots”),
would have lost.
 
Yes WR's were better and Smith's catch was impressive. Minny was loading the box which gave us a lot of one-on-one coverage.
 
Not a WOB.

Agree.

You cannot say that. The poster may actually think the word is “core” as in the central part. If so, that is a WOB.

Not a WOB, IMO. A WOB is using entirely different words with different pronunciations. Want of bee instead of wannabe, intensive purposes instead of intents and purposes, etc. Their, there, and they're aren't WOBs, they are all pronounced the same. Same situation here.
 
Props to Copeland for getting this receiving Core to progress and develop some. Also props to the receivers for showing up, huge shout-out to Brandon Smith for his coming out party, definitely looked like a goto reliable guy for stanley.
Agree with nice progress & like this thread.

Only thing though is that I think Minn lost their best DB a week ago. Is that correct?
 
Last edited:
Agree.



Not a WOB, IMO. A WOB is using entirely different words with different pronunciations. Want of bee instead of wannabe, intensive purposes instead of intents and purposes, etc. Their, there, and they're aren't WOBs, they are all pronounced the same. Same situation here.

Ruling accepted. Not a WOB, but a homophonic cousin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HawkandTackle
You can find a few dozen people here every day who think “they’re, their, and there” or “your and you’re” are interchangeable because they don’t know any better, but doesn’t make any of them, or this, a WOB. They’re homophones. You’re looking for an eggcorn, like granite instead of granted. Or pre-Madonna, instead of prima donna. This will help:
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo...ere-are-100-eggcorns-that-we-say-pass-mustard
If you’re arguing that the poster is actually talking about the central part of the receiving unit, it hurts your argument even more so. Because then what he wrote would actually make sense.


Thanks for the link HIWB. I did notice that "wantofbees" failed to make the NPR list. I guess it might be a Hawkeye Report original.
 
Agree.



Not a WOB, IMO. A WOB is using entirely different words with different pronunciations. Want of bee instead of wannabe, intensive purposes instead of intents and purposes, etc. Their, there, and they're aren't WOBs, they are all pronounced the same. Same situation here.
Really...Who give a S H I T...
 
  • Like
Reactions: jellyfish10
Big day for the passing game! Looked like Stan was pretty good with touch and accuracy save for the lazy toss for the interception. Satisfied with the production there, even pleasantly surprised.
 
Big day for the passing game! Looked like Stan was pretty good with touch and accuracy save for the lazy toss for the interception. Satisfied with the production there, even pleasantly surprised.
I wonder if Stan was tossing it out but still giving his receiver a chance to make a toe in bounds great catch, and just failed to see the rodent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Harbinger273
You can find a few dozen people here every day who think “they’re, their, and there” or “your and you’re” are interchangeable because they don’t know any better, but doesn’t make any of them, or this, a WOB. They’re homophones. You’re looking for an eggcorn, like granite instead of granted. Or pre-Madonna, instead of prima donna. This will help:
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo...ere-are-100-eggcorns-that-we-say-pass-mustard
If you’re arguing that the poster is actually talking about the central part of the receiving unit, it hurts your argument even more so. Because then what he wrote would actually make sense.
Dude, no need to pylon.
 
You can find a few dozen people here every day who think “they’re, their, and there” or “your and you’re” are interchangeable because they don’t know any better, but doesn’t make any of them, or this, a WOB. They’re homophones. You’re looking for an eggcorn, like granite instead of granted. Or pre-Madonna, instead of prima donna. This will help:
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo...ere-are-100-eggcorns-that-we-say-pass-mustard
If you’re arguing that the poster is actually talking about the central part of the receiving unit, it hurts your argument even more so. Because then what he wrote would actually make sense.

lol wow.
 
Agree with nice progress & like this thread.

Only thing though is that I think Minn lost their best DB a week ago. Is that correct?
Yes they did. Antoine Winfield's son. He made an OUTSTANDING play in the end zone to pick off a pass that won them the Fresno State game.

Fresno had goal to go with little time left and threw a floater over the top to a wide open receiver and put too much air under it, and Winfield recovered to tip it and pick it. Great play and preserved the win.

His old man was a beast for the Vikings. Toughest sure tackler in the NFL in his prime.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT