I'll take BMJ and Lancet over some random dude posting things on Twitter w/o citation and explicit explanation of his methods and assumptions.
Remember when some of you blasted people for saying Covid is just like the flu? Prepare to eat crow....
- Thread starter The Tradition
- Start date
I'll take BMJ and Lancet over some random dude posting things on Twitter w/o citation and explicit explanation of his methods and assumptions.
100% correct
Covid sequelae are CITED as being a major reason for increased deaths.
And the illnesses are completely in line with observed Covid symptoms and sequelae.
LOL yeah. There was actual data in mine. Shocker! Not just a paragraph. Should do some more digging into his work and he shows a lot more data too!
You're not getting that for statistical analysis of CDC data dude. All of his graphs have citation and he has explicit methods and assumptions used in detail, you just doesn't look that far because you're not very bright.
100% Incorrect.
If getting covid and dying later from cancer and heart issues was related to acquiring covid, you would have seen the signal in 2020 and we didn't. The excess deaths only started occurring, shocker, starting in March of 2021 coinciding with jabs. You've cited zero.
If he has a detailed "writeup", then post it.
Otherwise, you're blowin' smoke out your ass again, here.
ONE of his posts claims a "seasonal adjustment" for cancers.
I've posted for you that, aside from sun-related cancers, this does not exist.
Ergo: He fudged the data and has posted his misinformation that you gobble down like Turkey Jizz.
Funny how flu deaths just disappeared there for a while due to covid. Didn't realize covid was so good at eliminating its competition
****ing absolutely correct.
Google it. The flu "disappeared" because masks and distancing prevented its spread.
There are quite a few epidemiology papers about it.
If masks work that good to stop the flu why hasn't a single doctor through 41 years of living and 10 years of military service EVER recommended me wearing a mask during cold and flu season? Are doctors that dumb?
They do, in the hospitals. Ever been in one?
They wouldn't bother before, because you weren't gonna listen, anyway.
Precautions taken to fight the COVID-19 pandemic, including wearing masks and distancing, are likely the major reason for a steep decline of flu cases in the U.S., according to experts.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently reported that it had logged 1,316 positive flu cases in its surveillance network between September 2020 and the end of January 2021. During that same period last year, the CDC had recorded nearly 130,000 cases.
Stephen Kissler, a research fellow in the Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, said in a February 11, 2021 Vox article that while more people received a flu vaccine this year, the sharp drop in cases was probably largely driven by mask-wearing and distancing. Kissler suggested that wearing masks in the future could be an effective way of helping control flu outbreaks. “Wearing masks in the wintertime, I think it’s something that might be here to stay,” he said.
A sharp drop in flu cases during COVID-19 pandemic | Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Precautions taken to fight the COVID-19 pandemic, including wearing masks and distancing, are likely the major reason for a steep decline of flu cases in the
www.hsph.harvard.edu
Science | AAAS
www.science.org
(and since Covid has a FAR higher R0 value than flu, they're less effective at fully stopping Covid. But flu, with an R0 far lower, is severely limited from spreading)
you mean controlled sterile environments where there is frequent handwashing? those hospitals? Yeah I'm sure its masks that work there.
...they've been used there for "more than 41 years".
And, aside from the ORs, they aren't "sterile environments".
I bet they're more sterile than your typical office building. And if they aren't, then its a crappy hospital run by incompetent people. By that of course I mean doctors.
The presentation @your_master5 seems to be hanging his hat on appears to fall into the "lies, damn lies, and statistics" basket. If this guy has uncovered something this consequential, submitting it for peer review is the only ethical thing to do. I have a feeling I know why it hasn't occurred.
Are you f'n kidding? You HAVE to be kidding. It can't be possible to be this stupid and still be alive.
Ummm how small do you think the particles of a virus are, how big are the holes in a mask?
You know they viruses aren't flying around without being on a medium correct??
Even if we say that they are 100% airborne google impaction and diffusion principles of a mask.
I would imagine as small as virus particles are, they could probably fly around on the humidity of the air.
LMAO I posted his analysis of the cancers and there is no fudging of data dimwit idiot bag who says crap he can't prove.
Why? so, you can claim more BS statements and not back them up? Says the guy who posts horseshit charts from acasignups.net and then tells me he only accepts things from BMJ and Lancet. Awkwardly hypocritical yet again bonehead.
There's no data showing it works...anywhere. Not from RCTs, not real life application, nowhere. Thinking that influenza disappeared because of masking is the dumbest possible thought process around.
That would be the difference between airborne and droplet. While guess that some do believe that influenza is airborne vs droplet. However, even airborne would be impacted by difussion/impaction.
Think about it... yes the holes in mask are larger than a virus. You know the thickness of a mask compared to a virus? A mask is ~1.5mm and a covid particle is 0.1 micrometers. Just doing quick math the virus would have to travel a distance 15000x it's size to get out. The virus doesn't magically go toward the light it is dispersed...additionally in those holes there is fabric "arms" that are also in the way for impaction to occur.
His "analysis" only showed a bunch of unreadable graphs.
Post a PAPER he's written and I'll review it.
Yes
There IS fudging of the data.
He's claimed in some charts he CORRECTED cancer data for "seasonal" variation.
I've posted numerous peer-reviewed articles for you that MOST cancers follow no such "seasonal variation".
Either link a PAPER he's written that describes IN DETAIL what he's analyzing, or you have no fricking clue what you're talking about.
Things I say when I see you post, especially about worthless masks that dummies like you continue to promote.
Nope, there is not. There is overwhelming data showing it does not work.
I've seen none of what you posted and you saying "claimed in some charts" is total shit.
SHOW EXACTLY WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DISPROVE, BONEHEAD.
Latest posts
-
-
Brauns, Mulvey Taking Advantage of Added Minutes Down the Stretch- Latest: Eliot Clough
-
-
-