Well at least two of those trillions are one each for Obama and Biden in their first year giving their people some love. Don't think the R's ever did thatFiguring out a way to turn this into being the Dems fault
Well at least two of those trillions are one each for Obama and Biden in their first year giving their people some love. Don't think the R's ever did thatFiguring out a way to turn this into being the Dems fault
Remind me how many republicans voted for the inflation reduction act.Link to a single dollar that Biden spent that wasn’t approved by Congress.
None. Now let’s do how many Republicans went back to their district and touted the dollars being spent for projects.Remind me how many republicans voted for the inflation reduction act.
Also the build back better act.
TIA.
Why not. Getting a share of the pork pie should be their objective once crap like that passes.None. Now let’s do how many Republicans went back to their district and touted the dollars being spent for projects.
TIA
They were taking credit for stuff that was already being designated for projects X Y or Z…that they had nothing to do with directing the money towards their district, and in fact voted against despite knowing they’d see some of that money come their way.Why not. Getting a share of the pork pie should be their objective once crap like that passes.
Remind me how many republicans voted for the inflation reduction act.
Also the build back better act.
Trump increased spending by $8.18 TrillionNice try.
The tax cuts took place in 2018.
Inflation hit when vegetable joe started spending.
If they want to cut spending, they ought to have a clause in those spending bills that if any representative votes against the bill, then their district won't get a dime out of the bill. That should save $Millions, or even $Billions.And yet they are all out stumping in their districts touting the infrastructure and benefits that those bills have provided to their constituents....
the real drivers of the debt are not the discretionary spending that's always the target of political rhetoric...If they want to cut spending, they ought to have a clause in those spending bills that if any representative votes against the bill, then their district won't get a dime out of the bill. That should save $Millions, or even $Billions.
Republicans have demonstrated no interest in addressing SS problems.the real drivers of the debt are not the discretionary spending that's always the target of political rhetoric...
it's SS and Medicare/Medicaid
We aren’t in debt because of Medicare and Social Security either. We do have significant future liability but the programs aren’t yet in the red long term. Medicaid is of course a driver of debt currently. That 34t has nothing to do with Medicare or social security. Other social programs yes.the real drivers of the debt are not the discretionary spending that's always the target of political rhetoric...
it's SS and Medicare/Medicaid
but entitlement reform is hard and requires real work from our legislators to solve an existing problem...not just change the number behind a line item in a bill to slash funding
any discussion of debt reduction that doesn't include addressing the entitlement programs is not a serious discussion
we aren't $34T in debt in 2024 because of the $0.78T inflation reduction act 2 years earlier...anyone who brings that up but doesn't bring up all the non-discretionary spending is not a serious person...just regurgitating talking points they heard or saw somewhere else
Look everyone! A midget clown! 🤡
This has been the case ever since Nixon was President. However, it has always been the Democrats fault!
Can we safely assume now that you must be on Trump's VP short list?Look everyone! A midget clown! 🤡
You must be very proud, right?Look everyone! A midget clown! 🤡
She's "not a MAGA", but she "had no choice" but to vote for Trump.
And midgets, evidently.She's "not a MAGA", but she "had no choice" but to vote for Trump.
And it's imperative that we curb-stomp them gays and trannies down, because they are the ones destroying 'Merica, yo!!!!
LoLCan we safely assume now that you must be on Trump's VP short list?
![]()
Joe’s here everyone! Who wants to argue with Joe today?She's "not a MAGA", but she "had no choice" but to vote for Trump.
And it's imperative that we curb-stomp them gays and trannies down, because they are the ones destroying 'Merica, yo!!!!
Are you a more “compact” fella?And midgets, evidently.
Joe’s here everyone! Who wants to argue with Joe today?
Gotta do it before 4PM…sundowners starts early for Joe.
No tax increases until spending is under control. It's at every level of the government from fed, state to even local counties. Counties revenues double the assessed values with no levy rate reductions. Talk about leaches. They definitely go the memo that if we don't spend it we won't get it in next year's budget. Need to clean house from all these governments.The GOP should leave taxes alone. It's not the time to raise or cut taxes. It is time to cut government spending, particularly at the federal level.
No tax increases until spending is under control. It's at every level of the government from fed, state to even local counties. Counties revenues double the assessed values with no levy rate reductions.
FUNFACT: city, county, state and federal budgets need to increase, as their communities continue to gain population...
Which does not necessarily "linearly" translate to all the roads/infrastructure costs and services costs.FunFact:
Increased population is supposed to come with an increase in the number of participating taxpayers...