Not sure that's going to work, Rubes.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/11/politics/marco-rubio-slams-opponents-in-south-carolina/
http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/11/politics/marco-rubio-slams-opponents-in-south-carolina/
Last edited:
Rubio crafts new plan post-debate: Call everyone else inexperienced
- Thread starter Huey Grey
- Start date
This is like Kobe calling someone else a ball-hog. Way to keep pissing this election down your leg, Ruboto.
He struck me a slickster from day one. I just couldn't put my finger on it until CC gunned him down in cold blood. That was good TV.
The Gun Fight at the GOP Corral has killed Rubio's credibility ..
He was mortally shot by Chris Christie. Rubio the Robot will
no longer be a major factor in the GOP race. He was never the
political genius that he thought he was.
He was mortally shot by Chris Christie. Rubio the Robot will
no longer be a major factor in the GOP race. He was never the
political genius that he thought he was.
Rubio has the same resume as Barack Obama:
He is running for President as a U.S. Senator
who is young and has not completed his first term.
He has no demonstrated leadership skills in a previous
administrative job.
He is trying to BS the American people that his inexperience
in life is what we are looking for.
He is running for President as a U.S. Senator
who is young and has not completed his first term.
He has no demonstrated leadership skills in a previous
administrative job.
He is trying to BS the American people that his inexperience
in life is what we are looking for.
Red please don't lecture conservatives on nominating someone with no experience. You guys did that in 08 and look what that got us. There is a reason Bern and Trump are doing so well right now. People on both sides are angry about the disaster that has occurred the past 7 years.
Personally, the think the damage inflicted by Christie was mortal.
Rubio fumbled much worse than did Rick Perry four years earlier ... and the surprising thing for a guy who is always so well rehearsed was that he did not see it coming. Wouldn't his campaign staff have walked him through the potential potholes in his debate strategy? They must have known what his weaknesses were. Why did they not have a pre-prepared response?
Rick Perry seemed to simply have thought he could wing it in the debates. Rubio seemed to have always had pre-prepared responses. Now, everyone knows that he lacks thoughtfulness.
Rubio fumbled much worse than did Rick Perry four years earlier ... and the surprising thing for a guy who is always so well rehearsed was that he did not see it coming. Wouldn't his campaign staff have walked him through the potential potholes in his debate strategy? They must have known what his weaknesses were. Why did they not have a pre-prepared response?
Rick Perry seemed to simply have thought he could wing it in the debates. Rubio seemed to have always had pre-prepared responses. Now, everyone knows that he lacks thoughtfulness.
With GOPers, it all goes back to Obama.......who you gonna hate 2 years from now?
Yep, look what it got us, affordable health care for millions of previously uninsured Americans, a world saved from a global depression, a recovered US auto industry, marriage equality for gays and lesbian Americans, an American economic recovery from the worst economic situation since the Great Depression, despite the best efforts of the Republicans in Congress to sabotage it, an opening of relations with Cuba, a nuclear deal with Iran, opening the way for its future integration into the community of nations, just to name a few things that the Obama presidency has gotten us.
Yet the electorate is more angry than ever on both sides of the aisle ciggy. If Obama had accomplished as much as you said he has, then Hillary(who has tied herself to the Obama administration) would win this election by 20 points. Unfortunately you, Joel, and Huey live in a fantasy world and can't see reality.
Running on his foreign policy experience is terrible strategy for Rubes, namely because he doesn't have much. The bulk of it comes from sitting on the Foreign Relations Committee. He isn't that Committee's Chair, nor its second in command. He's just another cog in the wheel who has been there far less than any of the other member. That's not exactly something to brag about. To compound this strategy further is that Rubes has been skipping out on Senatorial votes. How many votes has he missed for the Foreign Relations Committee? So he opens himself up to this attack point. Further, touting his foreign policy experience opens him up to attacks from Cruz over Rubes not standing by the work he did in the Gang of 8. And we all know how much Cruz loves any opportunity to attack Rubio over the Gang of 8.
Marco can easily get smoked six ways to Sunday for this false bravado.
Why do you call him 'Rubes'? Isn't Rubio just as easy to type? It's the same number of letters even.
Cause anyone who still supports this guy is one. Plus it saves me two syllables when I say his name in my head.
He's obviously having fun with his last name in the same vein as "Shrillary", "Hitlery" and many others that you've never had a problem with until now. Hopefully your sensitivities weren't too badly damaged having to read "Rubes" instead of "Rubio". Ts and Ps
Oh thats bull. People have been running on the 'washington outsider' plank for years....more angry than ever? please. Hillary would love to tie herself to Obama. In fact she tries. Her problem is her own baggage.
No, those people are idiots too. I've said as much about dumbass nicknames by both sides(Berries? Really?) on many occasions.
The guy claims that Obama is intentionally trying to destroy the country like some sort of evil genius. Being called Rubes is the least of his worries. I could call him RubiOIT if I was trying be more accurate.
Fareed Zakaria had a good column on Rubio's disgusting claims that somehow Obama was intentionally trying to destroy the country in the WaPo today. Here's the conclusion:
What, then, made America truly exceptional, from the start? It was a country founded not on race, ethnicity or religion but on ideas. And, crucially, those ideas were open to all. This openness to people, ideas, cultures and religions resulted in the creation of a new person — the American. The great historian Gordon Wood explains his view of American exceptionalism: “In an important sense, we have never been a nation in any traditional meaning of the term. . . . We Americans do not have a nationality the way other peoples do . . . which of course is why we can absorb immigrants more easily than they can.”
Other countries have small states and low taxes, and there are many liberal democracies, even republics. But no other country from the outset believed in the idea of openness and the mixture of people. The United States is a nation founded on diversity — of race, religion, national origin.
There are efforts to change America. There are plans to introduce religious and ethnic tests to bar immigrants and even visitors, or to track immigrants and visitors once they arrive. There have been calls to deport people, even American citizens. There are proposals to monitor houses of worship.
These ideas would fundamentally change America, tearing at its founding DNA. It would make it much more like the rest of the world, becoming one more nation in which certain ethnic groups and religions were privileged and others were outsiders, a country in which diversity was a threat to national character and unity rather than a strength.
And who is it proposing these changes? The last time I checked, it was not Barack Obama.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...4d3dca-d105-11e5-88cd-753e80cd29ad_story.html
Who Trump really should be calling a pussy is Marco. During the last debate Rubes didn't even have the nuts to say whether he supports or condones torture. How weak can you get? It's just like the rest of his campaign: Play it safe and avoid sticking his neck out on anything.
I understand intelligence is relative, but with that being said, you re in no position to make that claim.
I have no problem admitting that Obama has been behind the ball many times. Just look at the rollout of the ACA. But Rubio has literally made the central message of his campaign the claim that Obama is systematically and intentionally trying to destroy our country. He might as well just start wearing a ten gallon tinfoil hat with this crap.
Especially since Jan apparently doesn't know the difference between much and must.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not a fan of Rubio's for the same reason Christie stated. A freshman Senator with no real proven leadership skills is not qualified to be POTUS, IMO.
You serious, Jan? You literally follow me from thread to thread trying to play grab ass. You know this game and you know it well.
And if you've paid attention, I've agreed with you on a few things today. plus, that comment was not directed at you, it was directed at DR Spaceman. I've posted several times today with substantive arguments. And the one tongue in check comment I make, there he is waiting to pounce.
I honestly didn't think I was being an asshole. What part of my post did you find insulting?
Similar threads
