Rule of Law is dying quickly...
- Thread starter Joes Place
- Start date
I gave @binsfeldcyhawk2 shit earlier for failing to live up to “both sides bins” because he never calls out Team Trump’s Marxist, sickle and hammer Joseph Stalin charges. I even offered to give him a sincere apology if he could find one example of him criticizing that type of hysteria from Team Trump. I am still waiting.
Regardless, like me, he is wondering how far you and Joe expect the Trump Reich to go.
His end game will end wherever he and The Heritage Foundation say it ends. Evil racist men do evil racist things.
Let’s just imagine Trump says POC are no longer allowed in America. Will he? Doubtful. But hypothetically, IF he did, millions of Americans would support him. ZERO PERCENT should. But if he wanted to, he could get away with it with a lot of support. Men on this site would be fine with it and we both know it.
I think anyone that hears comparisons to the most well known authoritarian regime in modern history and immediately has to link that the the entirety of the evil the Nazis inflicted is also being hyperbolic.
This is where we get into trouble, Tom.
Doubtful hypotheticals mean nothing.
And the stupid, shitty things Trump actually does do never elicit any type of response from the general public because they are so used to the histrionics on the left. I’m not talking about trying to reach members of the MIB; I’m talking about average people who rarely pay attention to politics and just go about their day trying to make basic ends meet.
When the left keeps beating the “Trump is Hitler” drum, average people roll their eyes and think, Yep, the left is just as crazy, woke, and unhinged as people say they are.
That’s what’s happening here, Tom. And that’s why Democrats continue to lose elections.
I have repeatedly asked questions on how far they predict Trump will go with being in lockstep with Hitler. Joe is the one who asserted Trump will go all the way—hence the question mark next to the statement you highlighted.
I have given him ample opportunity to clarify what he means.
That's fair. I guess I read it as the boilerplate dismissal so many are fond of spamming.
Uh...are you not paying attention to what is being set up at Guantanamo this moment?
Several documented cases of folks here legally on asylum status who have been scooped up and sent there w/o any due process already.
And, yet, there was none.
Every 1/6 assailant was charged with a documented, existing code violation.
Now, you have Bondi making generalization claims about going after everyone who was "unethical".
That simply never happened under Garland.
No
And she was neither President or Vice President at the time.
Biden fully complied w/ Court orders. 100%
He never once made a peep about ignoring them.
You're misstating what I said.
Trump and his minions will subvert and overturn our Constitution and Rule of Law. They already are.
Where it goes after that will depend on what alleged "conservatives" decide is "ok".
And we continue to move down that path.
Bondi, ignoring Rule of Law to let perps off for political purposes is the most recent example. Trump pardoning every 1/6 perp was bad enough - now you have an AG who will continue to do this and will not stall or stop him.
As corrupt as Bill Barr was, he knew where that line was and would step on it, but not over it.
They're trying to normalize it, by just constantly repeating the unconstitutional stuff.
Already, w/ the 1/6 pardons of violent criminals, they are trying to use that as an example for going after political adversaries who have committed no crimes.
Joe is afraid of his own shadow thus he sees the boogie man everywhere he looks.
Expect anything different from a MAGA that doesn't understand the Constitution...???
Not so much
Mark Levin Makes A Strong Conservative Case With Weak Constitutional Arguments
Mark Levin Makes A Strong Conservative Case With Weak Constitutional Arguments
A lack of rules is not what keeps Obama and Progressives from behaving.
www.forbes.com
LOL - you and your Little Factory of Sadness won't last another 4+ years.
He was a Chief of Staff for someone.
Never a WH counsel.
Mark Meadows was a Chief of Staff, and too chickenshit to testify before the 1/6 Committee.
His female assistant had to do that heavy lifting for him.
Similar threads
