ADVERTISEMENT

Savannah strips name of U.S. Vice President from the public square named in his honor in 1851....

The Tradition

HB King
Apr 23, 2002
127,954
102,417
113
SAVANNAH, Ga. (AP) — Leaders of Georgia's oldest city voted Thursday to strip the name of a former U.S. vice president and vocal slavery advocate from the public square named in his honor more than 170 years ago.

Plotted in 1851, Calhoun Square was named for John C. Calhoun, a prominent politician from neighboring South Carolina, who before his death in 1850 spent decades in Washington serving in Congress and as vice president under Presidents John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson.

Calhoun was also outspoken in his support of slavery during the decades preceding the Civil War. That has made him a target in recent years of racial justice advocates in Savannah and elsewhere seeking to remove from public spaces statues and other honors to the Confederacy and white supremacists.

The Savannah City Council voted unanimously to remove Calhoun's name from the square during a meeting Thursday afternoon. The mayor said it could take a year for city officials to decide on a new name.

“John Calhoun had a phenomenal career as an American statesman. On that side of it, he is a legend,” said Savannah Mayor Van Johnson, who nonetheless said he supported removing Calhoun's name because his views on race don't “reflect Savannah in 2022.”

"I think the views of Mr. Calhoun really propagated, supported and promoted slavery," said Johnson, who like 54% of Savannah's population is Black.

Calhoun Square was among the last of two dozen public squares established in Savannah's downtown historic district between 1733 and 1851. With towering live oaks and blooming azaleas framing benches at its center, the square is surrounded by Greek Revival homes and two city landmarks — Wesley Monumental United Methodist Church, dedicated in 1890, and the 1855 Massie Common School House, one of Georgia's oldest public school buildings.

A block to the north is Clary's Cafe, the diner featured in author John Berendt's 1994 bestseller “Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil.”

Before Savannah acted, honors had been stripped from Calhoun in his home state of South Carolina. City officials in Charleston dismantled a statue of Calhoun in one of its squares in 2020, and Clemson University removed his name from its honors college the same year.

In the early 1800s, Calhoun became known as “The Cast-Iron Man” for his unbending support of Southern states’ rights. He called slavery a “positive good” and said in speeches on the U.S. Senate floor in the 1830s that Southern slaves were better off than free Blacks in the North. With his pro-slavery “Calhoun Doctrine,” he led the South toward secession before he died in 1850.

Some in Savannah opposed taking Calhoun's name off the square, where it had long been printed in bold white letters on signs as well as on a metal plaque embedded in a brick walkway.

Calhoun earned the honor through his four decades of service in Washington,, said Andy Calhoun, a Savannah native who says he is a descendant of John C. Calhoun's brother. In addition to serving in both houses of Congress and as vice president under two presidents, John C. Calhoun had also been a U.S. secretary of war and secretary of state.

“It’s obvious why the city of Savannah honored his statesmanship," said Calhoun, 69. “He wasn’t honored for his views on domestic slavery.”

He added: “Why people are so intent on revising history, I just don’t get it.”

Savannah tour guide Patt Gunn, one of the leading proponents for renaming Calhoun Square, applauded the council's decision on a day when Tropical Storm Nicole brought gusty winds and occasionally heavy rain to coastal Georgia.

“I think it should be a day of cleansing, because of the rain," said Gunn, a Savannah native and slave descendant. "And by removing Calhoun, it will be part of a healing process.”

Gunn spent the past two years leading a group of advocates in calling for a new name for Calhoun Square.

A major hurdle for the group was a city ordinance requiring a majority of property owners on the square to agree to any name change. Gunn said her coalition got the required signatures three times, only to see homes of supporters sold to new owners. That negated their name-change petition before city officials could act.

Johnson and allies on the city council agreed on a workaround. Their vote Thursday was solely to remove Calhoun's name from the square. The mayor said he plans to give property owners and other residents a chance later to help decide on a new name for the square.

"If it takes a year to do, I’m not mad about it,” Johnson said in an interview.

The mayor asked Savannah's city manager to have signs in the square bearing Calhoun's name removed immediately. Until there's a new name, he said, it should be called “the square formerly known as Calhoun Square.”

 
Well if we’re going to bury accolades let’s go with this

‘City to rename public square that was named for prominent slavery and secession advocate’

In addition to serving in both houses of Congress and as vice president under two presidents, John C. Calhoun had also been a U.S. secretary of war and secretary of state.
 
In addition to serving in both houses of Congress and as vice president under two presidents, John C. Calhoun had also been a U.S. secretary of war and secretary of state.
In the early 1800s, Calhoun became known as “The Cast-Iron Man” for his unbending support of Southern states’ rights. He called slavery a “positive good” and said in speeches on the U.S. Senate floor in the 1830s that Southern slaves were better off than free Blacks in the North. With his pro-slavery “Calhoun Doctrine,” he led the South toward secession before he died in 1850.
 
In the early 1800s, Calhoun became known as “The Cast-Iron Man” for his unbending support of Southern states’ rights. He called slavery a “positive good” and said in speeches on the U.S. Senate floor in the 1830s that Southern slaves were better off than free Blacks in the North. With his pro-slavery “Calhoun Doctrine,” he led the South toward secession before he died in 1850.

He died 10 years before the secession happened.
 
It’s not erasing shit. It’s taking away the glory. Rename the square and you can still put up your plaque about the would be traitor.

What a bizarre view.

The square has been named "Calhoun" for nearly 175 years. Retaining the name with "education" makes more sense than blowing it up and renaming it for.... who?

And what's to stop people 175 years from now deciding that the new guy named for the square isn't politically correct in their modern worldview?
 
What a bizarre view.

The square has been named "Calhoun" for nearly 175 years. Retaining the name with "education" makes more sense than blowing it up and renaming it for.... who?

And what's to stop people 175 years from now deciding that the new guy named for the square isn't politically correct in their modern worldview?
Your view is the bizarre one. Keep a glorification for a person just because it was 175 years ago. Being a secessionist isn’t about being politically correct. He was actively working against the country even after serving it. His record is never going away, but a little honor the city gave him is.
 
What a bizarre view.

The square has been named "Calhoun" for nearly 175 years. Retaining the name with "education" makes more sense than blowing it up and renaming it for.... who?

And what's to stop people 175 years from now deciding that the new guy named for the square isn't politically correct in their modern worldview?
The world moves on. He was honored for 175 years and he’s long gone, so where’s the harm in changing the name? There’s nothing about that square that‘s inherently tied to Calhoun, just the name. This isn’t Monticello or Martha’s Vineyard. We rename shit all the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VodkaSam
Your view is the bizarre one. Keep a glorification for a person just because it was 175 years ago. Being a secessionist isn’t about being politically correct. He was actively working against the country even after serving it. His record is never going away, but a little honor the city gave him is.

I'm sure it'll be Stacey Abrams Square or some stupid crap like that.
 
Good for them. It's good to see that this city is exercising their right to name things whatever the hell they want. Not sure why you are so upset about the slaver losing the recognition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: artradley
It's erasing history. Put up a sign about his views on slavery and states' rights. But don't just bury the history. Further the narrative.
“Erasing history” has to be the stupidest in a long string of stupid phrases from the right. You guys all say it, and you should be mad at whoever came up with it that you’re all copying. Literally nothing about Calhoun that we know today won’t be knowable tomorrow. If anything, a piece of history hasn’t been “erased,” but examined in its entirety. That’s a good thing. It’s what we with degrees in history do.

A 54% black town decided it could probably find someone better than a guy who fought to keep black people in shackles to name a public square after. That’s what this really boils down to.
 
I trust the people of Savannah to pick someone that they think deserves the square’s name….and if the populace in 50 years wants to name it for someone else, that’s cool too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BioHawk
Good. Put up your plaque explaining why the name was changed and move on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaboKP
This seems like a good idea to me. However, we need to leave Confederate soldiers be. Like it or not they are considered US veterans. They re-swore loyalty to the US and we forgave ‘em for going astray. Over and done.
 
This seems like a good idea to me. However, we need to leave Confederate soldiers be. Like it or not they are considered US veterans. They re-swore loyalty to the US and we forgave ‘em for going astray. Over and done.
Uhh, no. They swore loyalty and then picked up arms against their nation to fight for slavery.
 
It's erasing history. Put up a sign about his views on slavery and states' rights. But don't just bury the history. Further the narrative.
You don't commemorate people who plot to overthrow the U.S. Government. The naming of this square in his honor was a dig by a pro-slavery state and demonstrated their support of the attempted destruction of the U.S. Government.
 
You don't commemorate people who plot to overthrow the U.S. Government. The naming of this square in his honor was a dig by a pro-slavery state and demonstrated their support of the attempted destruction of the U.S. Government.

Again, he died 10 years before the war and the square was named for him the year following his death. The rebellion hadn't happened yet.
 
Again, he died 10 years before the war and the square was named for him the year following his death. The rebellion hadn't happened yet.
It doesn't mean his work wasn't relevant to the attempted overthrow.
 
Again, he died 10 years before the war and the square was named for him the year following his death. The rebellion hadn't happened yet.

It doesn't mean his work wasn't relevant to the attempted overthrow.

His actions while alive did more than almost any in the South to harden Southern attitudes towards finding peaceful solutions towards the slavery question.

If you’re compiling a list of men who created the conditions that ultimately led to the Civil War, he’s in the top 10.
 
Why was it named for him in the first place? He was not from there, or even from that State. He did not appear to have any ties to the area.
Sure, most towns have roads, parks, or whatever named after some of the founding fathers or a couple of other very prominent national figures (JFK, MLK, Franklin), but there are an abundance of guys throughout our country's history who accomplished as much or more. I could understand a park in his hometown being named for him, but not one in another state (to which he had no ties whatsoever)
 
Why was it named for him in the first place?

In addition to serving in both houses of Congress and as vice president under two presidents, he had also been a U.S. secretary of war and secretary of state. Arguably the most-successful southern politician of his time.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT